Quantcast
Channel: Martial Studies – Kung Fu Tea
Viewing all 467 articles
Browse latest View live

Chinese Martial Arts in the News: April 4th, 2016: Taijiquan, Shaolin and New Books

$
0
0
Gerda Geddes and Sophia Delza.Fightland.Charles Russo

Gerda Geddes and Sophia Delza. Source: Fightland/Charles Russo

 

Introduction

 

Welcome to “Chinese Martial Arts in the News.”  This is a semi-regular feature here at Kung Fu Tea in which we review media stories that mention or affect the traditional fighting arts.  In addition to discussing important events, this column also considers how the Asian hand combat systems are portrayed in the mainstream media.

While we try to summarize the major stories over the last month, there is always a chance that we have missed something.  If you are aware of an important news event relating to the TCMA, drop a link in the comments section below.  If you know of a developing story that should be covered in the future feel free to send me an email.

Its been a while (almost a month) since our last update so there is a lot to be covered in today’s post.  Let’s get to the news!

 

Chinese Martial Arts in the News

 

Our leading story for this week comes from the (virtual) pages of the Vice Fightland blog.  My friend and fellow researcher of Chinese martial arts history Charles Russo just published a short essay titled “The Forgotten (Female) Pioneers of Tai Chi in the West” profiling the lives and contributions of Gerda Geddes and Sophia Delza.  Its well worth taking a look at.  Incidentally, readers should also check out the last section of this news update for information on the release of Russo’s upcoming volume (published by the University of Nebraska Press) on the development of the Chinese martial arts on the West Coast during the mid 20th century.

 

Henans police learn Taijiquan

Taijiquan has made a few other appearances over the last couple of weeks.  One has to do with the decision of Henan’s Military Police to begin to teach Chen style Taijiquan to its officers.  The Talking Chen Taiji blog (always one of my favorites) has a nice write-up of the story based on an article posted on the police command’s webpage.  Here is a quick quote to whet your interest:

“China’s official military police website recently highlighted the introduction of Chen Taijiquan into the training programme of its officers. The idea behind its introduction is to transmit traditional culture, improve officers physical constitutions and to enrich their cultural awareness and life style when they are not on operational duty. In the time-honoured Chinese way, the movement is encapsulated in a slogan: “Learn Taiji, strengthen the body and spirit, quieten the heart and nurture the body”.

 

A still showing FM Chiu Chi Ling from Kung Fu Hustle.

A still showing FM Chiu Chi Ling from Kung Fu Hustle.

 

If you are looking for an exciting training opportunity of your own, and you happen to be in the St. Louis area, you are in luck.  GM Chiu Chi Ling, a renowned practitioner of Hung Gar, will be leading a workshop at the International Shaolin Wushu Center.  If I were anywhere in the area I would definitely be calling to see if there is any space left for this event.  But you will have to act fast as he is due to appear on April 5th!

Master Shi Tanxu. Source: Rick Loomis/LA Times.

Master Shi Tanxu. Source: Rick Loomis/LA Times.

Master Shi Tanxu, however, is in it for the long-haul.  The LA Times recently ran a somewhat lengthy story detailing the Shaolin Monk’s life, background and success in spreading the traditional Chinese martial arts in the LA area.  As always, these sorts of stories are fascinating windows into the sorts of narratives that accompany the modern Chinese martial arts.  This article has a few nuggets on the details of running a high profile martial arts school in a crowded marketplace today.  I thought the following incident was particularly revealing:

“When he went to apply for a business license using the name “Shaolin Temple,” he found more than 200 other businesses using the name, Yanxu said. The temple had provided documents certifying that he was an official Shaolin monk, but counterfeiters replicated them so perfectly that they looked more authentic than the real thing.

When he opened his first center in Temple City in 2008, attorneys from the more established kung fu academies told him that he had to stop using the name of Shaolin, Yanxu said with a laugh. He kept using it, and they never followed up with the lawsuits.”

 

Students from a martial arts school practice Shaolin Kung Fu on cliffs in Dengfeng, Henan Province, China, March 17, 2016. REUTERS/Stringer

Students from a martial arts school practice Shaolin Kung Fu on cliffs in Dengfeng, Henan Province, China, March 17, 2016. REUTERS/Stringer

There seems to be one constant that unites the many disparate news stories on the Shaolin Temple.  The fighting arts of this institution and its various associated commercial schools generate some astounding visual images.  Indeed, one wonders how much of the modern image of the Chinese martial arts in the West can be traced directly to the “Shaolin visual aesthetic”?

The latest contribution to this popular genera comes from the pages of the Daily Mail.  It ran a photo essay (appropriately) titled “Masters of inner peace: Hair-raising pictures show Shaolin kung fu monks sharpening their skills on terrifying cliff face.”    It appears that the local schools and photographers have been putting Deng Feng’s famous mountains to good use.

 

Taiji being demonstrated at the famous Wudang Temple, spiritual home of the Taoist arts. Notice they wear the long hair of Taoist Adepts. Source: Wikimedia.

Taijiquan being demonstrated at the famous Wudang Temple, spiritual home of the Taoist arts. Source: Wikimedia.

 

The English language branch of CCTV (China’s state run public television network), has recently released a new documentary dealing with the traditional Chinese martial arts.  It has been split into four 20 minute chapters.  The first of these follows a Western student who has come to a school at Wudang in hopes of finding inner peace.  I have yet to find the time to sit down and watch the entire thing, but I must admit to a certain weakness for these sorts of documentaries.  If nothing else they are a fantastic example of the way the Chinese martial arts are being deployed as part of the state’s larger public diplomacy strategy.

 

Ip-Man-3-New-Image

The blows just keep coming for the producers of Ip Man 3.  In our last news update we learned that Chinese government regulators had accused the production company backing the film of buying large numbers of imaginary movie tickets (with very real money) in an attempt to artificially inflate the apparent success of their film and hence the value of the company.  Such practices had been rumored for some time, but the government had seemed to turn a blind eye to them in the past, particularly when the “juiced” numbers supported the popularity of a domestically produced film at the expense of foreign rivals.  However, there are now worries that estimates of the actual size and nature of the Chinese film market have become so distorted that future products may suffer.

Unfortunately this has not been the end of the story.  A recent article by Reuters indicated that over 100 private investors stormed the offices of the Jinlu Financial Advisors in Shanghai (the group that had backed the Ip Man film and a number of other questionable projects) demanding back payments on their loans and other investments.  Reports indicate that most of these individuals are not “industry insiders,” but were regular people who had been convinced to invest large amounts of cash with the production company.

 

A scene from the second season of Dare Devil. Source: Daily Beast

A scene from the second season of Daredevil. Source: Daily Beast

Those interested in the portrayal of the martial arts (and Asian Americans) by the Western media will want to check out a recent essay by Arthur Chu (of the Daily Beast) titled “Not Your Asian Ninja: How the Marvel Cinematic Universe Keeps Failing Asian-Americans.”  He has a lot of good things to say about the second season of Daredevil on Netflix, particularly as it relates to the introduction of the Punisher’s story line.  But then he gets to the ninjas, and that is where the trouble starts….

“Look. Did the producers of Daredevil set out to create a storyline where every single Asian character is an agent of supernatural evil who is deeply corrupted by that evil and empowered to be a monstrous killing machine because of it? I doubt they thought of it in those terms. They just took existing tropes from the comics and ran with them without thinking too hard—and lo and behold, an army of interchangeable evil ninjas plus one sexy femme fatale is what they got.”

Ever since Bruce Lee there has been a debate about value of the portrayal of Asians using the martial arts in the popular media.  Did Bruce Lee smash suffocating stereotypes about Chinese masculinity, or did his work subtlety reinforce them?  It is a fascinating conversation, and one that martial arts studies has made important contributions to.  But Chu’s main beef with the way that this other story-line within the Daredevil franchise is developing is that there is really nothing “nuanced” or “subtle” about the stereotypes that are being put on the screen.  It will be interesting to see whether the shows producers respond to criticism like this in the future.

Bruce Lee executes a spectacular flying kick while filming "Game of Death."

Bruce Lee executes a spectacular flying kick while filming “Game of Death.”

Speaking of Bruce Lee, CNTV recently released a short interview with Lawrence Grey regarding his upcoming Bruce Lee biopic.  Interestingly he states that the Lee Estate approached him about the project and that he was initially not inclined to take it.  Apparently he changed his mind after they OK’ed something that would look more at the internal emotional and psychological struggles of Lee rather than simply his external battles.  Grey states that he has a director for the project but declined to give a name.  Nevertheless, he is predicting a 2017 release date.

 

A still from Rise of the Legend. Source: NY Times

A still from Rise of the Legend. Source: NY Times

 

In other movie news, the NY Times ran a short review of “Rise of the Legend.” All things considered they seem to have liked it, even if they withheld effusive praise.  This seems to have been a well produced and enjoyable film.  It will no doubt be of special interest to anyone who is a fan of the Wong Fei Hung movies or who follows the development of the folklore surrounding Guangdong’s most famous martial artist.

 

Now With Kung Fu Grip! How Bodybuilders, Soldiers and a Hairdresser Reinvented Martial Arts for America. By Jared Miracle. McFarland & Company (March 31, 2016)

Now With Kung Fu Grip! How Bodybuilders, Soldiers and a Hairdresser Reinvented Martial Arts for America. By Jared Miracle. McFarland & Company (March 31, 2016)

 

Martial Arts Studies
As always it has been a busy time in the world of martial arts studies.  The conference “Kung Fury: Contemporary debates in martial arts cinema” (April 1 at Birmingham City University) has just wrapped up.  We hope to have some “after-action” reports to share soon.

Also the draft schedule for the 2016 Martial Arts Studies Conference is now available.  It looks like we have an exciting group of speakers and papers lined up for this year and a few new activities as well.  There is still time to register for the conference if you would like to attend.  If you want to make use the University’s housing accommodations during your stay its important that you get this registration in soon!  Of course there are also lots of other hotels in downtown Cardiff and it is a very charming and walkable city.

If you are interested in Capoeira, or just looking for some good reading material, be sure to check out Greg Downey’s recent chapter “Capoeira as an Art of Living: The Aesthetics of a Cunning Existence.” He first published this in the 2014 volume Fighting: Intellectualizing Combat Sports, and was kind enough to post a copy on his Academia.edu account.

Also, it looks like Jared Miracle’s book Now with Kung Fu Grip!: How Bodybuilders, Soldiers and a Hairdresser Reinvented Martial Arts for America is about to be released and should be shipping within days.  Dr. Miracle has written a number of excellent posts for Kung Fu Tea and readers may remember his superb article on the Donn F. Draeger, R. W. Smith and Jon Bluming “Imposing the Terms of Battle” in the last edition of the journal Martial Arts Studies. Be sure to check out this book for more high quality historical research on the modern history of the Asian martial arts.
striking distance.russo

Last, but by no means least, Charles Russo’s latest book is now available for pre-order through amazon.com.  Titled Striking Distance: Bruce Lee and the Dawn of Martial Arts in America this 272 page volume from the University of Nebraska Press is scheduled to ship around the end of June.  This volume should have great cross-over appeal to both practitioners and students of martial art studies, and I hope that it will make an important contribution to our understanding of the history of the Chinese martial arts community in North America.  Here is the publishers blurb:

In the spring of 1959, eighteen-year-old Bruce Lee returned to San Francisco, the city of his birth, and quickly inserted himself into the West Coast’s fledgling martial arts culture. Even though Asian fighting styles were widely unknown to mainstream America, Bruce encountered a robust fight culture in a San Francisco Bay area that was populated with talented and trailblazing practitioners such as Lau Bun, Chinatown’s aging kung fu patriarch; Wally Jay, the innovative Hawaiian jujitsu master; and James Lee, the no-nonsense Oakland street fighter. Regarded by some as a brash loudmouth and by others as a dynamic visionary, Bruce spent his first few years back in America advocating a more modern approach to the martial arts and showing little regard for the damaged egos left in his wake.

In the Chinese calendar, 1964 was the Year of the Green Dragon. It would be a challenging and eventful year for Bruce. He would broadcast his dissenting view before the first great international martial arts gathering and then defend it by facing down Chinatown’s young ace kung fu practitioner in a legendary behind-closed-doors high noon–style showdown. The Year of the Green Dragon saw the dawn of martial arts in America and the rise of an icon.

Drawing on more than one hundred original interviews and an eclectic array of sources, Striking Distance is an engrossing narrative chronicling San Francisco Bay’s pioneering martial arts scene as it thrived in the early 1960s and offers an in-depth look at a widely unknown chapter of Bruce Lee’s iconic life.

 

 

Chinese_tea,_gancha

Kung Fu Tea on Facebook

A lot has happened on the Kung Fu Tea Facebook group.  We discussed the life of Yu Chenghui, the relationship between Silat and that state in S. E. Asia, and China’s repeating crossbows! Joining the Facebook group is also a great way of keeping up with everything that is happening here at Kung Fu Tea.

If its been a while since your last visit, head on over and see what you have been missing.



Thinking About Failure in the Martial Arts

$
0
0

Failure.Ueshiba.meme

 

The Meaning of a Bruised Elbow

 

I have been working on a couple of projects that have taken me away from blogging in recent days.  These are the sorts of commitments that should bear fruit for the readers of Kung Fu Tea down the road, but in the mean time they are making it difficult to keep up with my regular writing schedule.  As such, this post may be a bit briefer and less structured than some of my other essays.

Even though my time has been tight, I still feel compelled to sit down and write about a subject that has come up multiple times, in different guises, over the last couple of weeks.  Specifically, how should we interpret instances of failure in when thinking about the martial arts?

Failure is a broad topic.  My right arm is currently sporting prominent bruises from my lightsaber combat class earlier this week.  They are an immediate reminder that I failed to properly defend myself from disarming attacks in a free-sparring session.  That in turn speaks to a certain failure in understanding of structure and range in a new style of fencing.  Had I been under attack from a real lightsaber wielding opponent, I likely would have ended up like Luke in Empire Strikes back or Anakin in Episode II!  Luckily in this galaxy functioning lightsabers are rare.

Practicing martial artists are quite used to dealing with these sorts of performance related failures.  It is a normal and expected part of training.  They point out areas where systemic effort can be applied and improvements in performance can be made.  In some cases they may even lead to a fundamental rethink of one’s basic concepts and approach to a problem.  Failure then becomes a valuable spur to new research that may lead to important innovation.

While I have no privileged knowledge of what actually happened in Bruce Lee’s much discussed duel with Wong Jack Man, it is interesting to note that the outcome of the fight is often discussed in these exact terms.  It was an instance of technical failure that led to a series of important innovations and eventually the development of a new combat philosophy, Jeet Kune Do.  In this sense the right sorts of failures are critical to both progress in our personal training and popular narratives about innovation in the martial arts more generally.

Yet failure is not always a strictly personal matter.  Scholars of martial arts studies can apply the “three levels of analysis” to an examination of this concept.  We might see failure as occurring at the level of individual practice (as in the Bruce Lee case), at the institutional level (such as the collapse of an individual school or lineage), or at the broader systemic level, such as the death of all the local folk arts in Guangdong following the 1949 liberation.

Just as an individual fighter might watch tapes of his or her previous fights in an attempt to improve their future performance, students might look at past failures of martial arts to create better theories of how they function and what social roles they actually perform.  Indeed, those of us in the social sciences often find ourselves in the rather paradoxical position of trying to create theories better able to “predict” instances of failure in the past, rather than talking very much about the future at all.

This sort of “post-diction” is one of the main ways that we attempt to test the actual strength of our understanding.  If I create a theory of institutional failure that can explain the decline of the Japanese martial arts in the current era, I would be more likely to put my trust in it if it could also be shown to also speak to their near disappearance in the middle of the 19th century.  Can our theories grant us insight into past events?

 

Failure-after-Success

 

Finding Failure amid Success

 

All of this sounds simple enough.  Yet as any graduate student in the social sciences will quickly tell you, the most challenging aspects of research projects are often not theoretical but empirical.  Is it actually possible to gather enough reliable historical data to test a theory in anything like a scientific way?  Lots of promising projects simply don’t happen because basic issues in research design cannot be overcome.

Data reliability can also be a critical issue when we start to think about trends in popular culture.  Again, the idea of “failure” is critical to this entire discussion.  By definition most of the organizations that we are aware of entered the historical record and our personal consciousness precisely because, to one degree or another, they succeeded.  Instances of institutional failure have a much harder time making it into the historical record.  As such they tend to be systematically underrepresented.

This is especially true as you go back further in time.  In the case of the Chinese martial arts it does not take all that many decades for the historical record to become very slim indeed.  When we consider the dozen or so manuals that have come down to us form the late Ming period there is a disproportionate probability that these ideas or movements were quite popular at the time and enjoyed a wide circulation.  That is precisely the reason that they are what managed to make it down to us.  Being steeped in this literature it is all too easy to forget that we know very little of the “also-rans” that failed to leave a mark on the literary cannon.

This historical distortion is compounded by the ways in which we talk about important teachers, masters and lineages in the Chinese martial arts in the present.  During the construction of our folk histories success is duly noted, but instances of institutional failure tend to be glossed over.

Interestingly these omissions don’t always apply to the personal or systemic levels.  Instances of massive institutional collapse (for instance the fall of the Ming dynasty, or the Chinese civil war) often become the backdrops for important lineage narratives.  And cases of individual technical failure (frequently a lost challenge match or some other personal setback) are often invoked to demonstrate the persistence and determination of the ancestors.  But there is a middle range of failure that these accounts are usually silent on.

Ip Man’s biography is particularly instructive in this regard.  The popular sketch of his life notes that in 1949 he moved from Foshan to Hong Kong, bringing his beloved Wing Chun Kung Fu with him.  Due to his diminished economic circumstances he was forced to take on students and he began to publicly teach the art.  His students spread the system through their success in challenge matches, and in a remarkably short period of time (30 years) Wing Chun went from being an obscure local style (unknown even in Hong Kong) to one of the mostly widely practiced forms of kung fu within the global community.

All of which is good so far as it goes.  Yet it is interesting to consider what this account leaves out.  Many of Ip Man’s classes were not particularly successful.  In fact, at the beginning of his career in Hong Kong he struggled with student retention.  Class after class failed.  One of the reasons why he was teaching in so many locations was that he was looking for an institutional formula that could catch on, and his early efforts (by in large) failed.  Simply doing what had been done in Guangdong a generation earlier was not going to work.

Nor did his problems with student retention vanish once he discovered new ways to make Wing Chun training more interesting to Hong Kong’s peripatetic urban students.  Retention again became a problem in the middle of his career following the advent of his relationship with another woman.  Then at the end of his career there were institutional disputes that led to him walking out on the VTAA, taking much of the organization’s teaching staff with him.

Anyone interested in exploring these instances further can do so in a number of sources, including my own recent volume which details much of Ip Man’s career. Yet the more immediate point is that we tend to remember only the success of the Wing Chun system and have forgotten many of the setbacks and early failures that it faced.  This creates a distorted view of the past.  Specifically, when we systematically disregard instances of institutional failure we often find ourselves creating theories that have no ability to accurately explain the system’s eventual success.

The truly scary thing about the Ip Man example is how quickly all of this can happen.  A number of Ip Man’s personal students are still alive, as are his two sons.  These individuals have even offered (and sometimes published) very helpful accounts of his early years speaking to both his successes and failures.  Yet the sort of public discussions that have risen up around the style (even in more scholarly circles) exhibits an odd flattening of the historical record.  So often our discussions go from Ip Man arriving in HK in 1949, to his instruction of Bruce Lee, to the explosion of “Kung Fu Fever” in the 1970s while skipping all of the intervening moments in time.

The 1930s were another critical period in the history of the Chinese martial arts, as were the 1890s.  Yet every generation you go back the thinner the historical record becomes.  Most of the failures are simply lost to history.

 

Star Wars meme.Now your failure is complete

 

Failure in the Age of Google

 

Dealing with these sorts of distortions is challenging.  But in truth historians of popular culture have been aware of these issues for some time.  Once we realize that our data tends to skew we can do something about it.

Some of my recent work looking at the development of “Lightsaber Combat” as a hyper-real martial art in the post-2000 period made me realize that there is another side to this problem that has generated less thought. The internet has had a profound impact on our ability to trace the genesis and growth of all sorts of recent movements.  Once again, this forces us to carefully consider how we interpret instances of failure.

While trying to understand a little bit more about the origins and nature some of the lightsaber groups that currently exist, I found myself going through cached threads on old discussion forums.  What I found was a painstakingly complete record of every to attempt to start a local meet up in the park, a new club or to resurrect a beloved organization.  And most of these efforts were, on an objective level, failures.

No one showed up to the park.  No one could agree on the goal of the club.  Or everyone suddenly remembered why their beloved group had exploded the first time after an ill-conceived attempt to “get the band back together.”  Some of these groups (if you were lucky) failed with a whimper, others went out with a spectacular (and probably scarring) bang.

One way or another, the message was clear.  The vast majority of attempts to do anything end, at one point or another, in institutional failure.

I would be lying if I said that just reading this stuff was not incredibly depressing.  I started to wonder “why did lightsaber combat fail so completely”….and then I caught myself.

This is not a movement that has failed (at least not yet).  From its birth, sometime in the early 2000s, it has grown incredibly quickly.  And as long as Disney keeps putting out blockbuster Star Wars movies (which they look set to do for the foreseeable future) it will continue to grow at a healthy pace.

Suddenly I had a sense that this is what it must have been like to be Ip Man.  Even in a period of active growth, failed schools and empty classes will always outnumber cases of spectacular success.  Entrepreneurs note that nine out of ten small businesses fail in their first year.  I would suspect that the same must be true of martial arts clubs and even casual meet-ups.  Yet this is not always a reflection of the health of a system, whether it is taijiquan, wing chun or lightsaber combat.  Often it just reflects the inherent challenges of putting together a new group.

The problem that students of popular culture face when they look to the more distant history of the Chinese martial arts is that many of the instances of institutional failure are self-erasing.  They just don’t appear in the historical record, skewing our understanding of why some groups actually succeeded.

Students of modern movements face the opposite problem.  Google forgets nothing…absolutely nothing.

Every failed school or meet-up is just as visible now as the day that it occurred.  Within this vast landscape of data it becomes increasingly difficult to make out the shape of the forest for the density of the trees (both standing and fallen).  It is ironic that the digital footprints of a movement which has died, and one that is still exploding, often look pretty similar at a certain level of granularity.

While the lineage myths of the past may further obscure this data, I personally have found that a few well selected “expert interviews” can do wonders for revealing the lay of the land in the post-google era.  In econometrics we often speak of the difference between “statistical” and “substantive” significance.  The former tells us that a trend is real, while the later suggests how big it actually is.  In an era of data overload, ethnography and expert interviews are important tools for actually establishing the direction of trends and their growing or declining magnitude.  Methodological triangulation can really help us to get a handle on some of these issues.

In our personal training we all want to know how to become better martial artists.  Likewise in our academic research we seek to understand why these traditional fighting systems have succeeded.  Ironically, in both cases, the key to understanding success is to pay much more attention to instances of failure.  In the absence of true large-N datasets, keeping it all in perspective is a challenge.

Either failure is too hidden by the historical record, or too eternally present in the collective machine mind that defines our virtual consciousness. Both of these possibilities create problems for those wishing to understand the inner-working of the martial arts.   Nor are there always easy answers to separate out the signals from the noise.  Still, the value of failure has always been in its ability to point out the areas that still need work. As such it is always worthy of our study.

 

oOo

If you enjoyed this essay you might also want to see: Why is Ip Man a “Role Model”?

oOo


It is a bad idea to fall in love in a Kung Fu story. Honestly.

$
0
0
A classic postcard, circa 1920s.

A classic postcard, circa 1920s.

 

Kung Fu and the Marriage Market

Love and Kung Fu simply do not mix.  At least that is the strongly implied message to be found on the pages (and silver screens) of many traditional Chinese martial arts stories.  Things are different in the West.  In America audiences cheered when Daniel LaRusso walks away with both the tournament trophy and the girl after defeating the comically Californian villains of the Cobra Kai dojo.

In that case the hero’s mastery of the martial arts seems to be legitimated by his growing success in the romantic and social realms.  The result is a coming of age story in which the previously awkward Daniel is now seen as fully equipped to face the challenges of adulthood.   And it is clear by the end of the film that his girlfriend has decided that he is quite the catch.  That is a critical point which we will be returning to.

All of this makes a fascinating juxtaposition with the early Wong Fei Hung films produced between the 1950s and the 1970s.  In these films the hero goes to (what might appear to American audiences) ridiculous lengths to avoid even the appearance of fraternizing with members of the opposite sex.  In of my favorite scenes an older Wong has been badly beaten and is rescued by two women who find him unconscious in the street.  They tend to his wounds and give him a place to recover.  But upon awaking and finding himself in a woman’s bedroom the solidly patriarchal hero literally throws himself out a window to get back onto the street, where the bad guys are.  It is all done to great comic effect, but the underlying message is clear.  A woman’s bedroom is a greater threat to our hero than all of the sword wielding baddies that central casting can call up.

Or maybe Wong Fei Hung’s fears were more practical.  I am not a literary scholar, but I have noticed a few things when reading older martial arts stories.  Nothing good ever comes from romantic entanglements within the realm of the martial arts.  In general dedicated love stories seem to have focused on promising young scholars, headed off to the big city to make their mark on the world (usually through the examination system), and the various muses that inspired them.

Relationships in Kung Fu stories typically ended in either tragedy or treachery.  Water Margin, sometimes called the ‘Old Testament’ of the Chinese martial arts is a striking example of this.  Every appearance of a woman in the text (with one exception) is immediately followed by someone’s bloody death.  It is almost as though the narrator is trying to tell us something.  The Chinese hero stands at the crossroads of martial glory and romantic success, but he can only choose one path.

Various scholars have noted that this oddly persistent pattern in Chinese martial arts fiction reflects important underlying social patterns.  These, in turn, suggest some interesting conclusions about the social function of the traditional Chinese martial arts during the late Qing and Republic periods that are worth considering.

Specifically, the martial arts tended to attract socially marginal individuals.  These were the “bare sticks,” younger males from impoverished backgrounds with no prospects for an inheritance, marriage or families of their own (in point of fact these three factors were closely related).  These sometimes volatile young men made up the majority of many martial arts schools.

As Valerie Hudson has noted, historically there has been a strongly positive correlation between an increase in the percentage of marginal, unmarriageable males, and social instability in China.  In late imperial China this often took the form of community violence with an increase in the size and scale of clan warfare, salt and opium smuggling and both banditry and piracy.

The problems that these young men faced were not merely economic in nature.  Masculinity in Chinese culture was not seen as a default trait enjoyed by anyone who happened to be born male.  It was something that had to be socially enacted and accepted.  The highly Confucian society saw fatherhood and family leadership (and even waiting patiently to inherit such a role) as the only legitimate expression of masculinity.

Thus the “bare sticks” were forced to find alternate institutions by which they could construct a discourse arguing that they too were males.  The realm of the martial arts was an obvious choice.  Here they could literally embody male Yang energy.  And local society needed any organization that it could get to control and channel the disruptive potential of these young men.  At times the government would even open new militia units with the express purpose of keeping them away from banditry and off the streets.  If civil society decided that it wanted to finance very similar ventures in the form of boxing or crop-watching societies, so much the better.

Unfortunately the martial arts are associated with violence, and other social values that are not exactly “respectable” in Confucian discourse.  These negative associations again challenged the public honor (and masculinity) of students.  So what better way to demonstrate one’s capacity for self-control (and to reinforce the social values of the community as a whole) than to express an exaggerated dedication to chastity in other areas of one’s life?

Thus the traditional Kung Fu story does something pretty amazing.  It attempts to make a virtue of a necessity, and in so doing argues that individuals who are often dismissed as being useless and of no value to society should have a key role in upholding its values.  While commenting on this complex of stories and values, Boretz noted that the Confucian social system enjoyed so much stability for so long precisely because it transformed those groups most inclined to attack the status quo into its greatest defenders.  Wong Fei Hung was actually making a pretty complex argument about the role of martial artists in society when he threw himself out that window.

 

A vintage postcard showing a beauty in a western style dress.  Circa 1920.

A vintage postcard showing a beauty in a western style dress. Circa 1920.

 

The Martial Arts, Marginality and Marriage

 

The best efforts of the Jingwu Association and other reformers notwithstanding, it is not clear that the modern Chinese martial arts ever managed to leave behind their association with social marginality.  Most of the students at the large Wushu academies in Henan and Shandong come from impoverished farming families who simply cannot afford better educational opportunities for their children.  My own research has shown a strong correlation between economic class and membership in certain martial arts organizations in southern China during the 1920s-1930s.  And when Dr. Daniel Amos revisited the same area to conduct his doctoral research 50 years later, even though society had been totally transformed by the events of 1949, the linkages between class and the martial arts were still firmly in place.  In fact, he dedicated much of his research to an exploration of marginality in the world of southern China’s martial artists.

Similar patterns can be detected on this side of the Pacific as well.  Professional boxers disproportionately come from challenged backgrounds.  And while different sorts of adult martial arts students are drawn to the martial arts for their own reasons, many of them share feelings of personal, economic or social insecurity.  Yet (returning to Daniel-san) perpetual bachelorhood has not typically been part of the mental image of the average western martial artist.

In fact, I know a number of couples who were brought together by their mutual interest in the martial arts.  This is pretty well attested in the more traditional arts, but I have even started to run across it in my recent lightsaber research.  I was reviewing old youtube footage of NY Jedi performances while a member of the organization narrated the action for me.  Over the course of our conversation I was struck by the number of marriages and relationships that seem to have come out of this single group of lightsaber practitioners.

Given the ostensibly celibate nature of the Jedi Order (a trait which seems to have been inspired by stories of chaste Christian knights and mysterious Shaolin monks) I found this to be ironic.  But should it have been?

In the West the martial arts have always promised a certain measure of transcendence. Yet they have found their greatest success as “coming of age” tools, initiating individuals into a more empowered role in society.  A black belt meant something when I was growing up because every other kid in school believed that it did, and so did their parents.

One wonders, however, if this is about to change.  For that matter, how generalizable are my personal observations?  Perhaps the social situation of the martial arts in the West has been (or is about to become) more similar to the traditional Chinese case than we care to admit.

Powerful and much discussed demographic trends are afoot in American society.  Oddly students of martial arts studies have remained largely silent on their implications.  The most important of these are the growing gap in income inequality and the declining number of children being raised in stable two parent homes.  In fact, individuals across the board are marrying later or not at all.

These facts, seemingly separate observations, were brought together by two law school professors (June Carbone and Naomi Cahn) in their 2014 Oxford University Press volume, Marriage Markets: How Inequality is Remaking the American Family.  To be clear, this frequently discussed book does not directly mention the martial arts at all, but it raises some interesting puzzles and possibilities for students of martial arts studies.

As was also the case with late 19th century China, America today is witnessing rapid increases in income inequality.  Much of this can be traced directly to the decline in certain modes of employment as more of the domestic economy has been exposed to international markets and free trade.  All of this has created a fairly predictable pattern of winners and losers.  Highly educated professionals in the right fields are the big winners from this shift in trade policy.  But those without a college education have been hit hard by the collapse in the manufacturing sector.

While a complicated argument, and too nuanced to fully review here, the authors argue that the expected social results of this shift have been reinforced by the rational decisions that American adults have been making about the utility of marriage. [Interested readers can find a more comprehensive review of their argument here]  Whereas Americans once married across class lines, increasingly individuals are marrying within their own social groups.

This tends to compound the accumulation of wealth at the top of the pyramid as more wealthy people delay marriage while looking for suitable partners.  They also tend to hold liberal views about the equitable distribution of household responsibilities, have a lower divorce rate and enjoy greater economic resources to invest in their children’s future (thus ensuring their future economic success).

At the bottom end of the spectrum the situation is very different. Job security has always mattered more to working class families than pure income, and in the current economy that seems to be the one luxury that no one can afford.  The employment fields once dominated by men have been hard hit by declining wages, massive restructuring efforts and a general deterioration in reliable employment.  Women, however, have seen their ability to earn a living increase.  Thus for an increasing number of working class women investing in a marriage partner seems like a bad deal.

Yet children raised in single income households do not enjoy all of the same educational and social benefits as their more wealthy peers.  It turns out that the greatest predictor of living in poverty is having grown up in poverty.  In this way a self-reinforcing cycle is established in which social dynamics are accelerating the trend toward a growing intergenerational income gap between the haves and the have not.

In short, Carbone and Cahn are arguing that shifts in economic structure and social norms have probably made Daniel a much less attractive marriage partner now than when he first appeared in movie theaters in 1984.  For much of America that cute boy next store has become an economic liability.

 

Vintage advertisement, circa 1920.

Vintage advertisement, circa 1920.

 

Testing the Promise of the Martial Arts

 

It is important to remember that many of the martial arts (particularly the Chinese ones) were born during moments of cultural, economic and social crisis.  Hard times should not doom these systems.   They have thrived during similar periods in the past.  But why was that so?

Scholars have noted that the traditional martial arts have made a number of explicit and implicit promises to communities in an attempt to demonstrate their utility.  It is probably no coincidence that during the economic upheavals that accompanied the end of the Qing dynasty guilds and labor unions across southern China became major sponsors of martial arts schools.  And as I have shown in my own research, certain martial arts organizations even offered some of the same social benefits and safety-nets found in guilds.

Less obviously, martial arts schools also offered their members resources to develop their store of social and human capital. Each of these organizations had committees dedicated to charitable associations, lion dance teams or community affairs.  Rising through the ranks of a martial arts association might give someone their first exposure to management experience, or lessons in accounting.

Of course the martial arts have always promised a certain boost in social status to aggrieved young men, whether the “bare sticks” of 19th century China or Daniel-san after his move from New Jersey to California.  In short, these sorts of arguments seem to imply that as more individuals find themselves falling into socially or economically marginal positions, the demand for membership in martial arts organizations should increase.  After all, these organizations have been promising to “make the weak strong” since at least the time of General Qijiguang.

Unfortunately I am not sure that recent history bears these expectations out.  A good many traditional martial arts organizations have been declining in the West at exactly the same time income inequality has been rising.  The economic uncertainty of the mid 1970s and early 1980s was in fact associated with a boom of interest in the martial arts, but the same cannot be said of the last decade.

Or can it?  While the fortunes of many traditional martial arts have declines, MMA, Krav Maga and BJJ have all seen their fortunes rise.  Successful film franchises have contributed to the growth of arts such as Wing Chun and Lightsaber Combat.  And parents seem just as interested in securing Taekwondo lessons for their children as ever.  That still seems to be regarded as a good “investment” in future success.

Has the economic downturn impacted the success of certain martial arts styles more than others?  Do some systems appeal to socially marginal individuals while other cater to the relatively well off (a situation seen in certain areas of China in early 20th century).  And what about the promises of the martial arts?  Can these systems help individuals to rebuild their confidence, gain social capital, acquire new skills and ultimately improve their lot in life?

All of these are fascinating questions, and as a social scientist I would like to test them.  Yet how one would go about doing this is not necessarily obvious.  In ethnographic or case study research it would be possible to rely on one’s own observations to establish the degree of marginality found in a specific setting.  Yet if we wished to test these hypothesis in a large-N framework, establishing a reliable proxy variable would be a challenge.

Again, the work of Carbone and Cahn suggest why this might be the case.  Marginality is a slippery if useful concept.  It is certainly related to income, but it cannot be reduced to income.  An individual earning $30,000 dollars a year in a secure job might be less marginal than someone who earned $40,000 but who went through seasonal layoffs.  Likewise educational status, the social prestige of one’s occupation, family background, shared values and other factors all seem to contribute to marginality in their findings on income inequality. In point of fact, it might be impossible for researchers to create a single statistical metric that captures all of these factors.

Then again, the research of Carbone and Cahn also suggests that other individuals may have done much of the heavy lifting for us.  After all, their work shows that socially marginal individuals get married at much lower rates than other groups within society.  Better yet, data on marital status is relatively transparent, easily coded and readily available in many of the sources of survey data that social scientists already use.

While not a direct measure of marginality, Carbone and Cahn’s work suggests that marriage rates might be an exceptionally accurate proxy variable, capable of capturing the nuances of how this situation has evolved over time.  This, in turn, might suggest more accurate ways of measuring what sorts of students are attracted to different martial arts, how this has shifted over time, and whether these systems are delivering on promises of social improvement.

Qing officials in late imperial China were well aware of the complex links between marginality, marital status, the martial arts and periodic outbreaks of community violence.  It appears that at least some similar mechanisms are still in place today.  One wonders how growing income inequality in the West will affect the success of the modern martial arts.

Can we expect a new generation of boxing bachelors?  Will the supply of social capital built up in styles like Karate or Wing Chun allow their organizations to cross-cut this growing social division?  Or might martial arts classrooms succeed in developing alternate status hierarchies and authentic communities where normal social relationships can continue?  Keeping a close eye on marriage rates might give us a simple tool to address some very complex problems.  But what would Wong Fei Hung think?

 

 

oOo

 

If you enjoyed this discussion you might also want to read:  China’s One Child Policy and Martial Arts Studies

 

oOo


Research Notes: The Chinese and Japanese Martial Arts as Seen on Western Newsreels

$
0
0
"Chinese Reoccupy Great Wall Area." 1933. Still taken from Vintage Newsreel.

“Chinese Reoccupy Great Wall Area.” 1933. Still taken from Vintage Newsreel.

 

 

“In the west, Asian martial arts are everywhere.  They are part of the texture of popular consciousness.  Nonetheless I want to argue that they remain marginal.  That is to say, although Westerners may see them often, and all over the place, they are not simply the norm.”

-Paul Bowman, “the Marginal Movement of the Martial Arts: From the Kung Fu Craze to Master Ken.” 2015.

 

 

Introduction

 

Students of martial arts studies stand at a perpetual crossroads.  It springs from the very nature of our subject.  A great many of us are current or former martial artists.  We have an intimate understanding of the embodied physicality of these practices.  As much as I like talking about the history of Wing Chun, I will be the very first person to say that if you want to understand what the art actually is, don’t start by reading a book or blog post about it.  Not even one written by me.  Go and do it.  Experience the actual system.  Examine how it makes you feel.

At the same time I have to wonder why you are asking me about Wing Chun in the first place?  As a historian I can tell you that it was a pretty obscure art back in 1949.  Chances are good that you first encountered this style through the media, either on TV or film.  That is just fine as the martial arts, while a sensuous experience, have always existed as an aspect of popular culture.  That was also the case in historic Japan and China.  In those countries commercial visual art (woodblock prints), professional storytellers, printed novels and traveling opera performers, spread the stories of various heroes just as effectively as film or videogames do today.

This is why martial arts studies needs to remain an interdisciplinary research area.  It is unlikely that any single methodological toolbox can reveal all that this body of practices has to offer.  On the one hand no less an authority than Douglas Wile has argued that Universities have an unprecedented opportunity to become involved in teaching, preservation and analysis of actual martial arts systems and traditions.

Still, we would be foolish to assume that the physical practice of the martial arts is a self-interpreting process.  The popular literature is littered with experts, spiritual gurus and ethno-nationalist propagandists all of whom would like assist us in discovering the “true” meaning of our practice.  How could it be otherwise?  The martial arts exist as social institutions, and social power is always somewhat fungible in nature.  That makes it a valuable and contested resource.

This realization should also spark a moment of self-reflection.  Images of these practices were introduced to us through an (often media driven) social discourse long before we started to practice them.  And while our understanding of their nature no doubt grew exponentially as we engaged with them, how do these “first impressions” continue to color our understanding of our practice?  How do they help to explain why some sorts of individuals, and not others, tend to be drawn to the martial arts in the first place?

We probably cannot understand our personal experiences within the martial arts, let alone their broader social impact, if we ignore the discourses which bring new students to the school door.  This is not simply a theoretical question.  For anyone interested in the health and future survival of the traditional martial arts it is a vital topic.

Readers interested in exploring this subject more deeply would be well advised to carefully consider Paul Bowman’s recent conference paper from which the introductory quote was drawn.  I suspect that as we look back on the development of martial arts studies it will be remembered as one of the more important papers given this year, particularly for those interested in the global spread and appropriation of the martial arts.

This paper is also a fun read.  It diverges from the (ever serious) mainstream discussion of history and film, and instead takes a look at the evolution of martial arts humor in the West.  As Bowman reminds us, humor is a powerful tool of analysis because it points to deeply held, and widely shared, cultural frameworks.  If you want to know what the public at large thinks about the martial arts, start by considering what they find funny.  This often reveals more nuanced views than a simple opinion survey might be able to uncover.

Unfortunately Bowman notes that the public spends a lot of time laughing at martial artists, rather than with them.  While these systems have successfully spread themselves throughout Western society, with terms like “Kung Fu” and “Ninja” now being part of popular culture, they always seem to lose out in the realm of respectability politics.

Consider the following.  No parent needs to explain or rationalize their decision to send a child to a summer sports camp, or to push them to excel in gymnastics or basketball.  But parents supporting their children in a Judo class or Kickboxing tournament generally come well-armed with a litany of justifications for their recreational choices.  It keeps my kids active, it teaches them to fend for themselves, it prepares them for the ‘real world,’ and (my personal favorite) it ‘builds character.’  Basketball probably does a lot of the same things.  But no one feels the need to concoct elaborate justifications for allowing their kid to try out for the school team.  It is just a normal and expected part of childhood.  And it is fun.

This is where the martial arts run into trouble.  For all of their name recognition, Bowman notes that they remain separated from the norms and hegemonic discourses that define mainstream western society.  Ergo the constant need to justify them as vehicles for other values that society has deemed to be acceptable.  In that sense our justifications of our practices are very revealing.  They speak to the sorts of questions and concerns that our neighbors might have when they learn that we have just signed a child up for a Brazilian Jiu Jitsu class.

The distance between the perceived cultural place of the martial arts and society’s dominant value systems creates a space of puzzlement, tension, and sometimes fear among non-martial artists.  Humor is important as it can be used to either subtly disarm these emotions, or to further marginalize the “deviant” behavior.

 

"London Sees Thrill of Japanese Sports." A Judo match between a British and German competitors.  Taken from a vintage newsreel. 1932.

“London Sees Thrill of Japanese Sports.”
A Judo match between a British and German competitors. Taken from a vintage newsreel. 1932.

 

Towards a Media Archeology of Martial Arts Studies: Judo, Kendo and the Dadao on Film     

 

While I agree with the main thrust of Bowman’s argument I would like to push its application in a more historical direction.  His investigation of the evolution of martial arts humor seems to begin in 1974 with the release of the now iconic disco hit ‘Everybody was Kung Fu Fighting.’  Bowman points out that the meteoric rise of this song through the charts marked, in many ways, the high-water mark of the ‘Kung Fu Craze’ of the early 1970s.

Touched off by grind house Kung Fu films (especially those by Bruce Lee), this interest in the Chinese martial arts had been seen as edgy, counter-cultural and somewhat dark.  This same view was even shared by some in the mainstream martial arts world where Bruce Lee’s movies did not always make a good impression on the more conservative practitioners of the Budo arts.  Yet by the middle of the 1970s the Chinese styles seem to have accomplished what it took the Japanese arts decades to do.  They too became fixtures in the pop culture landscape, and ‘Kung Fu’ quickly joined ‘Karate’ and ‘Judo’ as household words.  Krug places an acceleration in the cultural appropriation of the Asian martial arts as happening in this same time period.

Still, high-water marks foretell an inexorable retreat.  As the Chinese martial arts became famous they quickly lost their aura of danger.  What had been “dark” and mysterious became just another consumer good.

On Main Streets across America, Kung Fu schools opened their doors to throngs of students looking to recapture Bruce Lee’s magic.  The humorous disco hit of 1974 both illustrated and advanced this process.  As Bowman puts it “…the song ‘Everybody was Kung Fu Fighting’ participated in the domestication, sanitization, depoliticizing and, ultimately, ridiculing Kung Fu.”

Nor were the Chinese martial arts alone in this.  As Bowman points out in the rest of the article, what pop culture humorists tended to latch onto after the 1970s was the exotic “Oriental” nature of the martial arts.  The specific culture that gave rise to a given movement tradition (Japan, China, or the Philippines) was less important to western audiences than their essentially “Eastern” nature.  While it often irks aficionados that popular songs or TV shows seemed to confuse Chinese and Japanese traditions Bowman notes that this is simply how these things were perceived by audiences in the West.

Yet what sort of pre-history exists behind all of this.  Is it really the case that the Kung Fu Craze of the 1970s was a totally unique event?  Was this actually the first time that audiences were exposed to the Chinese (or Japanese) martial arts on a massive scale?  And can we trace the often uncomfortable humor that surrounds the martial arts to earlier periods, facing very different political and social challenges?

It seems that one of the hurdles facing students of martial arts studies is a periodic amnesia that grips public discussions of many of these topics.  It is certainly true that Bruce Lee was a unique figure on the western cultural landscape.  Yet he was not actually the first individual to put the Chinese martial arts on film and expose them to national audiences.  Likewise, the Japanese martial arts had gained wide exposure on the silver screen long before Samurai films became favorites of the post-WWII art house theater scene.

While I am still mulling over the specific mechanisms behind this unique form of cultural forgetting, I expect that at least some of it has to do with very basic factors dealing with the advertising and marketing of popular culture products.  The first step in selling the public something “exciting and totally new” is to never remind them that they have actually been exposed to similar things before.  Likewise audiences, in their excitement to be part of a cultural moment, seem inclined to see novelty in places that leave historians and archeologists of popular culture scratching their heads.  Ernest Renan famously remarked that a nation is a product of both collective remembering and forgetting.  It seems that this same sort of forgetting also plays a part in the construction of “new” social and media discourses.

For many research questions the historical antecedents of a phenomenon may not matter.  But in some cases I think they can be quite illuminating.  While the past may be consciously forgotten, its path-dependent structure leaves patterns that shape future events in interesting ways.  This is certainly the case when we examine media representations of Chinese and Japanese hand combat systems.  Consider, for instance, the question of exactly when these things became “humorous” and what that implies about the cultural appropriation of these systems in the west.

 

"London Sees the Thrill of Japanese Sports." A still taken from from a vintage newsreel showing a kendo exhibition match.  1932.

“London Sees the Thrill of Japanese Sports.” A still taken from from a vintage newsreel showing a Kendo exhibition match. 1932.

 

Newsreels: The Japanese and Chinese Martial Arts on Films

 

Bruce Lee’s iconic ‘Enter the Dragon’ was probably the first Chinese martial art film seen by an entire generation of Americans.  Samurai films had been present in the West for a while, yet they generally reached a smaller audience.  Kyle Barrowman has reminded us that Western audiences were also exposed to the martial arts in a variety of Hollywood films. Yet it is critical to remember that feature films were not the only places where individuals might be exposed to gripping and informative images of the Asian martial arts.

As I have argued elsewhere, the public display and discussion of the Japanese martial arts goes all the way back to the heyday of the magic lantern display.  Heavy glass slides, often delicately painted, along with standardized scripts, provided many late 19th century and early 20th century entertainment seekers with their first glimpse of Jujitsu, Kendo, reformed Judo, Sumo Wrestling and the historic Samurai.  Such images and discussions were actually quite popular and widespread almost 70 years before the explosion of the Kung Fu Craze.  More importantly for students of the history of popular media, they also helped to establish basic patterns and audience expectations that shaped the developing film industry.

As such we should not be surprised to discover that the Asian martial arts also made early appearances on film.  Yet they probably had their greatest impact in the now, mostly forgotten, newsreels that ran before or between the feature films that audiences had come to see.

A few words of orientation may be helpful before proceeding.  In an era before television, newsreels were a profoundly important instrument in displaying the sorts of images that would shape public opinion on critical issues.  Prior to the fragmentation of the media market they also had the ability to directly speak to large audiences.  While old newsreel footage may strike us as quaint, we should not underestimate the effect that it had on shaping people’s views of the world.  In fact, newsreels were popular with audiences precisely because (like the magic lantern shows of old) they allowed for a quick glimpse into foreign lands.  For students of popular culture and social discourse they are critical, and substantively important, historical documents.

A full survey of all of the martial arts related newsreels put together in the first half of the 20th century is well beyond the bounds of what can be done in a single blog post.  But for the purposes of exploring Bowman’s article I would like to ask viewers to consider four specific clips from the late 1920s and early 1930s (an era that is particularly important to my own research).  While I briefly describe each of these scenes I cannot directly host them on this on blog.  Readers are encouraged to take a few moments to view each of these segments as they are discussed.

Judo.information screen.1932

London Sees Thrills Of Japanese Sport.” A Vintage Newsreel. 1932.

We begin with two clips that deal specifically with the Japanese martial arts.  These are important because they illustrate many of the trends that Bowman introduced in his paper.  Already in the early 1930s the public discussion of the Japanese martial arts was characterized by humor.  And much of this bears more than a passing resemblance to the sorts of word-play focusing on cultural discomfort that will once again rise to the surface two generations later.

Perhaps my favorite of these clips is titled “London Sees Thrills of Japanese Sports.”  It ran in 1932 and recorded a martial arts exhibition and Judo tournament that pitted competitors from Germany and the UK against each other.  While the German fighters managed to score an upset by winning the tournament, most of the footage focused on the exhibition performances.

The footage is historically quite interesting.  It includes some Kendo Kata work, and a very spirited exhibition match.  Next a member of the audience was selected to try and score a hit against one of the Kendo masters with a Shinai.  Perhaps the highlight of the event was a self-defense demonstration in which a woman defended herself against repeated (somewhat bafoonish) attacks.  While a trained martial artist, the woman in question was an even better actor.  She showed a great ability to play to the audience and give them what they wanted.  And that was humor.  Note the gales of laughter that can heard as she deals damage to her unfortunate attacker, only to end by powdering her nose while standing over the body of her fallen foe.

"London Sees Thrills Of Japanese Sport." A self-defense demonstration by a female martial artist, choreographed to as to be humorous for the audience.  Vintage Newsreel. 1932.

“London Sees Thrills Of Japanese Sport.” A self-defense demonstration by a female martial artist, choreographed to as to be humorous for the audience. Vintage Newsreel. 1932.

In this case the narrator of the film did not make many jokes himself.  It seemed to be understood by the audience that what they were seeing was intrinsically funny.  And as Bowman suggested, much of that had to do with the western appropriation of Japanese practices and attitudes mixed with questions of gender performance.

In subsequent years the producers of these newsreels would not be so circumspect.  As the 1930s progress (see here, here and here) the humor becomes more pronounced and sharper in its focus.  Increasingly the narrator takes the lead in articulating and directing the humor.  Thus we can almost track the evolution of this particular discourse.  Yet by 1932 it seems to have been already firmly established

These newsreels are also informative in that they did not confine themselves to domestic subjects.  Like the magic lantern shows that preceded them they functioned as a form of virtual tourism for a public that was hungry for travel and worldly knowledge yet firmly grounded in their own lives.

Schoolboys "Kendo" at Tokyo.  Vintage Newsreel. 1934.

Schoolboys “Kendo” at Tokyo. Vintage Newsreel. 1934.

 

Particularly important is this very short segment titled “Schoolboys ‘Kendo’ at Tokyo.” Distributed in 1934 this film offers an important view of the evolving role of the martial arts in the Japanese educational system during a critical decade.  Note that the class has been moved out of the Kendo hall into a training field where the “future soldiers” could acclimate to fighting on bumpy and uneven ground.  The mass engagement between the two groups of sword wielding students rushing towards each other at the end of the film is a great illustration of the sorts of reforms (and militarization) of the Kendo curriculum during the 1930s and 1940s discussed by authors like Hurst and Bennett in their respective histories of Japanese swordsmanship.  In that respect this is another important historical document.

Note that the overall tone of this discussion is once again one of humor.  Even though the practice of the Japanese martial arts by Japanese students should raise no questions of cultural discomfort, humor is still evoked as the dominant paradigm by which a (somewhat disturbing) scene is discussed.  One wonders to what degree imperialist attitudes, or possibly fear in the face of rising militarism, contributed to the establishment of this discourse.

Schoolboys "Kendo" at Tokyo. Vintage Newsreel. 1934.

Schoolboys “Kendo” at Tokyo. Vintage Newsreel. 1934.

This makes a fascinating contrast to the next two newsreels.  They show scenes of Chinese hand combat training.  In some ways their historical and ethnographic value is even greater than the preceding films.  Yet how would their Western audiences have described what they were seeing on screen?

An exotic form of military training?  Certainly.  A “martial art”?  Possibly, though that term was not yet as popular in the public discourse as it became after WWII.  A type of self-defense system that they could learn and study for their own betterment and enjoyment (such as Judo, or possibly even Kendo)?  Certainly not.

The first of these films is the longest newsreel in the post, yet it is worth watching in full.  The final sequence shows a small formation of soldiers drilling with pudao (horse knives).  The form that they are doing is relatively short, clearly illustrated, and I suspect that someone could even teach it to themselves simply by watching this footage.  It’s a very nice demonstration.

"Russo/Chinese War Scenes." Chinese soldiers drill with Pudao.  Vintage Newsreel. 1929.

“Russo/Chinese War Scenes.” Chinese soldiers drill with Pudao. Vintage Newsreel. 1929.

 

"Russo/Chinese War Scenes." Chinese soldiers drill with Pudao. Vintage Newsreel. 1929.

“Russo/Chinese War Scenes.” Chinese soldiers drill with Pudao. Vintage Newsreel. 1929.

 

Yet this is not simply an attempt by the imperial West to show the Chinese as militarily weak or backwards.  This “training exercise” was introduced only after the audience was shown footage of a warlord and his officers, iconic images of modern troops marching along the Great Wall, and ranks of modern machine-guns being deployed in field exercises.  The Chinese military is shown as efficient and well disciplined.  One suspects that a Westerner watching this footage would likely equate the sword drill at the end to the Kendo of the Japanese military.  Which is probably what both the newsreels producer and the Chinese officers who agreed to be filmed both intended.

Dadao.information screen.1933

Chinese Re-Occupy Great Wall Area.” Vintage Newsreel, 1933.

A similar pattern is seen in our next film, “Chinese Re-Occupy Great Wall Area.”  Dating to 1933 readers of Kung Fu Tea will be pleased to note that the soldiers in this film are drilling with the classic dadao.  Whoever produced this footage went to great lengths to try and make a strong impression on the audience.  The clip juxtaposes images of a vast field of smartly dressed soldiers with close-ups of individual martial artists shot against the sky.  The effect is striking and serves to emphasize the acrobatic elegance of their practice.

 

"Chinese Re-Occupy Great Wall Area."  Vintage Newsreel, 1933.

“Chinese Re-Occupy Great Wall Area.” Vintage Newsreel, 1933.

 

 

The starkness of an individual soldier, engaged in dynamic movement, silhouetted against the sky reminds me of some of John Ford’s iconic WWII footage.  Like his more famous counterpart, this director also had an argument that he was trying to bring to the masses.  It sought to answer once and for all the persistent questions about the willingness and ability of Chinese soldiers to stand and fight.  As if to drive that point home the last sequence is framed by a pair of crossed dadao, inviting the audience to grab one if they dared.

I am interested in these two films because they seem to represent a point of departure in the discussion of the Chinese martial arts in the West.  In one sense what audiences are being exposed to remains remote, especially in comparison to Judo and Kendo.  It is not hard to find newsreel footage of both Western and Japanese practitioners of those arts in the 1930s.  Already they were moving into the realm of cultural appropriation, yet they remain outside of the hegemonic norms and identities.  The result is the emergence of exactly the sort of humor in the 1930s that Bowman predicts and explains in the post-1974 era.

In comparison there is nothing funny about the Chinese sword routines.  They are introduced not as sporting events or community interest stories.  Rather they exist in a grimmer world, one of international conflict, cities falling under martial law and modern armies on the march in Northern Asia.  There are no western practitioners of these arts, and so there is not the same sort of cultural discomfort that Bowman describes.  Those blades instead represent a forbidding reminder of the challenges facing the Chinese people during the 1930s and 1940s.  As such they may make audiences somewhat uncomfortable.  Yet there is nothing humorous about what they represent.

pudao.military.1

“Russo/Chinese War Scenes.” Chinese soldiers drill with Pudao. Vintage Newsreel. 1929.

 

 

Conclusion

 

Bowman is correct in noting that there is an important relationship between humor and the media driven global spread of the martial arts.  However, this post suggests that this basic pattern may have been established much earlier than the 1970s.  The newsreel footage demonstrates that these discourses were already in place (and even began to accelerate and evolve) by the 1930s.  If you are willing to go back and look at the writing in sports pages many of the same sorts of jokes and subtle concerns about identity masculinity and race can be found in the early years of the 20th century, just as Jujitsu begins to establish its presence in the West.

The Chinese martial arts, on the other hand, do not seem to come into their comedic own until much later.  This should not be taken as an indication that they were totally unknown, or that Bruce Lee was the very first Chinese martial artist to do something amazing on film before Western audiences.  The newsreel footage that we have reviewed here probably had a striking impact on the audiences that saw it during the early 1930s.  Yet it did not generate the uncomfortable humor that Bowman is interested in as it posed no threat to the West’s identity or dominant values.  Nor was it remembered decades later.

This provides additional support to Bowman’s central argument that (with some notable exceptions) the comedic discourse around the martial arts does not seem to be driven by pure racism.  More important is a critique of how certain types of westerners (often individuals already considered to be marginal by their own societies) seek to live out their fantasies by appropriating alternate models of masculinity or mastery.

What is left unresolved by all of this is the question “why?”  Why is there less public engagement with the Chinese arts than the Japanese one from the 1920s-1940s?  The immediate danger is that students of martial arts studies will fall back on the old trope that prior to the 1970s the world of Kung Fu was insular because the Chinese themselves were racist.  Their arts were not spread because they refused to teach outsiders.

This narrative conveniently ignores the truth that it was the Chinese-American community itself that was being victimized by systemic racism during the 19th and 20th century.  It also seems to neglect the fact that while a great many westerners were interested in learning about the Japanese martial arts, very few people seem to have had any interest in the Chinese systems, even when they were advertised to the public through newsreels such as these, performed at the 1936 Olympics, demonstrated by Ivy-League Chinese students as part of popular flood and famine relief programs, or widely seen during Chinese New Year displays in major urban areas.

Ultimately these things were not hidden from the public so much as they were studiously ignored.  Bruce Lee turned out to be a pivotal figure not because he was first to teach the arts, but because he managed to change what an entire generation of people wanted.

Yet his was not the first invitation.  These newsreels are important as they record early attempts to shape a more favorable public opinion of China in the West by showcasing its traditional martial arts.  Together the Dadao and Pudao disrupted the notion that the Chinese people were weak, the so called “sick man of East Asia,” and unwilling to stand and fight back against imperial aggression.  They attempted to showcase a highly disciplined army that had mastered both the modern technologies of the machine gun and mechanized transport, while staying connected to the cultured heritage of its past.  While America may have awoken to the beauty and potential of the Chinese martial arts only in the 1970s, these newsreels are a fascinating reminder that the hand of Kung Fu diplomacy had first been extended to the Western public at least 40 years earlier.

oOo

If you enjoyed this post see you might also want to read: Zheng Manqing and the “Sick Man of Asia”: Strengthening Chinese Bodies and the Nation through the Martial Arts

oOo

 

 


Star Wars: An American Martial Arts Film Franchise?

$
0
0
The Seven Form of Lightsaber Combat

The Seven Form of Lightsaber Combat

 

 

 

“When there is a fake—hippopotamus, dinosaur, sea serpent—it is not so much because it would not be possible to have the real equivalent, but because the public is meant to admire the perfection of the fake and its obedience to the program.  In this sense Disneyland not only produces illusions, but—in confessing it—stimulates a desire for it: A real crocodile can be found in a zoo, and as a rule it is dozing or hiding, but Disneyland tells us that faked nature corresponds much more to our daydream demands.  When, in the space of twenty-four hours, you go (as I deliberately did) from the fake New Orleans of Disneyland to the real one, and from the wild river of Adventure Land to a trip on the Mississippi, where the captain of the paddle-wheel steamer says it is possible to see alligators on the banks of the river, and then you don’t see any, you risk feeling homesick for Disneyland, where the wild animals do not have to be coaxed. Disneyland tells us that technology can give us more reality than nature can.”

 

Umberto Eco. 1986. “Travels in Hyper-Reality.”  In Travels in Hyper-Reality: Essays. Harcourt. p. 40.

 

 

“The speed, balance, the violence.  Kendo was everything that the Jedi and Sith are.”

 

Nick Gillard. 2015. The Evolution of the Lightsaber Duel.  ESPN. Min: 18:20.

 

 

 

 

Introduction

 

This post begins with a confession.  The question mark in the title is more honest than I am comfortable admitting.  On the surface it does not seem at all certain that the Star Wars films should be thought of as martial arts stories.  They are clearly a mash-up, a visual collage, showing many influences.  Their eclectic nature allowed George Lucas’ actual genius as an editor and compiler (the areas where I feel he truly excels) to shine through.

One does not have to look too hard to find the influences of the pulp science fiction serials of the 1940s and 1950s in the DNA of these films.  Flash Gordon is present, as are the ray guns and laser swords of that era. These films are also westerns, conveying more than a hint of the “cowboy ethos.”  More than anything else, they seem to be romantic adventures, deeply indebted to the swashbucklers of an earlier age.  That is a fine template of a quintessentially American “coming of age” story.

Yet I have never been able to shake the feeling that the Star Wars franchise played a critical role in aiding and abetting the cultural appropriation of the Asian martial arts in the West.  When Lucas released Episode IV: New Hope in 1977 (and even more, The Empire Strikes Back in 1980) he sowed the fields a subsequent generation of strip-mall Sensei would reap.

Historically speaking, the popularity of the Asian martial arts had been growing since the 1950s.  Bruce Lee’s release of Enter the Dragon in 1973 catapulted these fighting systems into the mainstream of popular consciousness.  Yet this newfound popularity came with hints of notoriety.

Not everyone in the America of the 1970s was equally enthusiastic to see legions of young people imitating Bruce Lee on playgrounds.  And to the extent that his message of liberation was taken up in the African-American and Latino communities, the spread of the Chinese martial arts played directly into the social cleavages and racial fears of the decade. [Nor should we ignore the important work of the African-American martial artists who predated Lee.]

Luke Skywalker’s appearance a few years later both benefited from, and served to accelerate, the social normalization of the martial arts in America.  As the spread of the Asian fighting systems became more popular and commercial, the entire project started to seem less threatening.  It began to resemble something that could be integrated into the economic and social structures of the day, rather than being a threat to them.

Yet there was still the question of why?  Outside of the sheer coolness of the exercise, why would someone dedicate themselves to training in the arcane arts of hand combat in an era whose anxieties were dominated by the Cold War and the prospect of a nuclear holocaust?  Given that most potential martial artists were rather young, why should worried parents in expensive neighborhoods be willing to bankroll any of these activities?  I suspect this is where Star Wars really enters the story of the Western martial arts community.

 

Luke receiving his fathers lightsaber in Episode IV: A New Hope (1977).

Luke receiving his fathers lightsaber in Episode IV: A New Hope (1977).

 

 

An elegant weapon for a more civilized age.

 

 

One of the immediate objections that I have received when raising the possibility of thinking of the Star Wars franchise as martial arts films (or at least putting them in dialogue with the genera) is that they contain no actual hand combat.  Where is the kung fu, the boxing, the grappling?  Indeed, the climatic final battle of the first film happens as the protagonists match their piloting skills against the Empire’s best and brightest.

While a reasonable critique, I suspect that this takes too narrow a view of what a martial arts film can be.  Given my research background I have acquired a great respect for southern Kung Fu films, especially the older ones with their tales of local lineage feuds and rival schools.  Yet there have always been other strains of martial arts story telling.  In Japan Samurai films tended to focus almost exclusively on armed combat and various forms of dueling.  We know that Kurosawa’s films, such as the “Seven Samurai” and “The Hidden Fortress,” had a formative effect on Lucas’ development as a film maker.

The Chinese populace also showed considerable variability in their cinematic tastes.  During the 1960s the Shaw Brothers produced a large number of Wuxia (or Swordsman) films that tended to be both more romantic in nature and to place a greater emphasis on weapons (which were always present in earlier eras) rather than boxing.  The One Armed Swordsman (1967) is a classic example of such a piece.

Thus the lack of fisticuffs alone cannot disqualify the Star Wars films as representative of the martial arts genera.  Perhaps the most important thing to note is that the way that combat is portrayed in each of these films represents cultural traditions and values.  When we see dramatic shifts in the sorts of representations of violence that are popular, it often pays to ask whether social values are changing. In the case of Hong Kong, the influx of massive numbers of non-Cantonese speaking refugees in the 1950s and 1960s does seem to have had a substantial impact on the sorts of martial arts stories that were told and how combat was imagined within them.

In a period of rapid change within American society (growing globalization, the Vietnam War, evolving gender and race relations) a return to the sword, and to the traditional values of “a more civilized age” that it represented, may have been deeply comforting to white middle class audiences.  This is not to say that the story-line of Star Wars is universally reactionary in nature.  Being fundamentally a visual collage it actually strikes me as rather hard to characterize.

Lucas was far from the first storyteller to draw upon the “romance of the blade.”  By his own admission he had grown-up watching pirate films and Errol Flynn features which promoted this same myth. As a symbol of Western knighthood, and often incorporated into Christian religious iconography, the symbolic background of the sword is far beyond anything that could be explored in this essay.

Yet if the youth of America were about to embrace the martial arts as a tool for stepping onto the stage of adulthood, one suspects that the image of a lightsaber was more in keeping with Western society’s hegemonic values that the battered and bloodied boxers popularized by Bruce Lee.  In short, while Lee may have massively popularized the martial arts among minority and economically disadvantaged communities, Luke Skywalker, Obi-Wan Kenobi and Yoda made them acceptable for the kids in the suburbs (or at least their parents).

As Bowman observed in a recent paper, the Asian martial arts, while widely known in the West, have never been accepted as representing core social values.  Their spread has caused a certain amount of anxiety which often manifests as a nervous humor.  More often than not martial artists have been laughed at rather than with.

The focus on the lightsaber seen in the Star Wars franchise does something very interesting.  While strongly suggesting Samurai and Wuxia traditions, these images were presented in such a way that they moved the discussion of certain aspects of the martial arts out of counter-hegemonic discourses and into the mainstream of Western popular culture.  Perhaps this is the reason why it is difficult to see the basic parallels with Asian martial arts films.  It all seems too familiar.

Yet there is much more to the Jedi and Sith than just the knightly traditions of the West.  The discussion of the Force, and the many force abilities displayed in the films, strongly suggested the more mystical aspect of the Asian martial arts.  All of this was happening at a time when there was unprecedented interest in Daoism, Buddhism and other Eastern philosophies.

Star Wars helped to normalize and familiarize an entire generation of film goers with these basic concepts.  It did not teach the details of any particular system, so much as it created a social space in which ideas about Qi, or the practice of Qigong, could be personally and then commercially explored.  By packaging these concepts in a way that was entirely acceptable to Western consumers, it created more of a demand for them than would otherwise have existed.

It also provided a lens through which various Asian martial arts traditions could be viewed and initially explained.  How many times have we have heard Star Wars metaphors invoked within traditional martial arts classrooms?  Krug has identified this growing acceptance of Eastern metaphysical systems (including the idea of Qi) as one of the core elements that ultimately allowed for the cultural appropriation of the Asian fighting arts in the West.

It is hard to imagine that George Lucas, if asked in the year 1972, would have admitted to making a martial arts film.  While he is happy to explain the various sources of inspiration that he drew on (including the Samurai films of Kurosawa), he seems to have always perceived his work as falling more in the category of romantic adventure.

This brings up the sticky question of authorial intent.  To what degree should the author’s view of his own work constrain our interpretation of it?  I would respectfully suggest that when engaging in social history a much more important set of questions might be, how did audiences see these films?  And why did they react to them in quite the ways that they did?

The Jedi vs. The Sith

The Jedi vs. The Sith

 

Hyunseon Lee recently presented a paper titled “Martial Arts Film as Global Cinema” which may help to bring some of these questions into sharper focus.  Her research, presented at the 2016 “Kung Fury: Contemporary Debates in Martial Arts Cinema” conference, dealt extensively with the relationship between Chinese opera and martial arts films.  It also noted the ways in which both have transmitted similar cultural values.

Given the importance of Cantonese opera traditions to the development of multiple southern kung fu styles, such discussions have always interested me.  However, she also presented another observation more relevant to the question at hand.  In her research she has identified a list of five core story elements that are central to traditional Chinese martial arts films, and not usually seen (at least as a complete set) in other types of action films.  They are:

 

  1. Conflicts between rival martial arts styles/clans
  2. Climactic duels
  3. A strong emphasis on the relationship between master and student
  4. A discussion of how self-mastery leads to victory over one’s external opponents, which can be seen as an extension of the Confucian “Doctrine of the Mean.”
  5. A romance of the hero, either engaged with or turned away from

 

It is not hard to find each of these elements in every one of the Star Wars films, prequels and now sequels.  The Empire Strikes Back comes the closest to fully embodying all of these points to the exclusion of practically all else.  Yet they define the development of each of the stories in some way or another.

The Star Wars myth is structured by the Manichean struggle of the Dark and Light sides of the Force as manifest by the competing martial and mystical traditions embedded in the Jedi and Sith.  The fratricidal competition between these two groups of warriors drives much of the action in the Star Wars mythos.

Every film features a climatic, mystical, duel.  In the original offering this takes the form of a battle between pilots who seek to employ the Force to guide their actions.  Yet in each of the subsequent films lightsabers are employed as the major tool by which the plot is advanced.

Luke’s relationships with Obi-Wan and Yoda practically defines the first two films in the franchise and has generated a huge amount of fan enthusiasm.  Much of the teaching bequeathed by these masters focuses explicitly on the importance of self-mastery above all else.  Indeed, Anakin Skywalker falls to the Dark Side precisely because he cannot embrace this principal.

Lastly, princesses (or queens) in distress are featured prominently in both the original films and the prequels.  It is however notable the degree to which The Force Awakens, the most recent offering in the series, has attempted to problematize this aspect of the archetypal story-arch.

In short, it should be no surprise that the Star Wars films have managed to capture the feel and texture of martial arts cinema.  While clearly translated into a different cultural context, the plots and story-lines employed parallel the conventions of a typical martial arts film to an almost uncanny degree.  It is thus no coincidence that so many viewers have watched the films, and then wondered what it would be like to embark on Jedi or Sith training.  Recently large numbers of people have gone so far as to invest substantial resources into the construction of hyper-real martial arts movements seeking to answer this very question.

 

art-star-wars-darth-vader-samurai-509744

 

Conclusion: Kendo Conquers Star Wars…Sort of.

 

 

I suspect that the initial affinity between Star Wars and the larger world of martial arts cinema was basically a coincidence.  Or more properly, we might say that it was an artifact of the diverse images and types of storytelling that Lucas was drawing from.  Vader’s mask is reminiscent of the ancient Samurai, but his helmet was also distinctly Teutonic in outline.

As the series expanded and evolved there appears to have been more of an effort to “Orientalize” its feel.  Yoda is an almost perfect embodiment of the Western ideal of the mystical Chinese sage, or as Adam Frank would say, the eternally vital and wise “little old Chinese man.”  By the time we get to Qui-Gon Jinn it is hard to believe that we are dealing with anything except an oddly Caucasian version of a wandering Asian swordsman.  While we can never quite place its origin, audiences would find it hard to imagine that his name could be anything except Asian in origin.

The prequels feature what must be considered one of the most gripping retellings of the “Burning of the Shaolin Temple” ever seen on screen.  In many ways Lucas’ adaptation of the famous incident is superior (at least for Western audiences) to the original published versions of the story in 19th century Chinese Wuxia novels.

In those novels the Shaolin monks are haughty and aggressive.  They are prone to bickering and feuding, often violently, among themselves.  This reflected the fiery temper and fierce independence that Guangdong’s residents (and publishers) valued in their own culture.  It also makes them difficult heroes to sympathize with.  When their Emperor managed to assert control over the situation and burn the renowned temple to the ground, most readers are forced to admit that Empire (evil or otherwise) has restored order to the land.

Much as Eco suggests in the opening quote, Star Wars draws off of these traditions and suggests that they can be improved upon.  We can have heroes who are “more” culturally accessible, princesses that are “more” relatable, and villains that “more” dastardly.  As the Star Wars franchise evolved it deftly identified much of what viewers found interesting in the martial arts films, and then if offered them “more.”  This was the same “more” that Eco identified as being at the root of American consumer culture; more immediacy, more accessibility, more excitement and meaning in life.

By bringing all of this back into the sphere of hegemonic western social values, and aggressively marketing his vision to a public eager for relics of that far away galaxy, Lucas promised that his stories could be “more” than the originals that they were based on.  Eco would surely have been impressed with his efforts.  He might even have declared Star Wars to be a hyper-real martial arts film.  Nor would he have been at all surprised by the immense amounts of money that Disney would be willing to spend to acquire this franchise.  In this regard the two entertainment empires have always been uncannily similar.

It is interesting to consider Nick Gillard’s introductory quote in light of Eco’s observations about the nature of hyper-reality.  Gillard was a fight choreographer who worked on the Star Wars prequels and he recently discussed his body of work on a short documentary, aired on ESPN in late 2015, titled “Star Wars: The Evolution of the Lightsaber Duel.

This feature was part of the publicity effort that preceded the recent release of the Episode VII: The Force Awakens and focused almost exclusively on the lightsaber.  In many ways this was an obvious advertising ploy.  Not only is the lightsaber one of the most iconic and popular images to emerge from the original franchise, but Luke’s once and future weapon would play a critical role in the plot of the upcoming film.

Still, the ESPN program did not focus exclusively on lightsabers.  Instead the documentary began with an extended discussion of traditional Japanese fencing in the form of Kendo.  Kendo masters were interviewed in Japanese.  Black and white historical footage was shown.  Scenes from classic Samurai films were cut into the action.

Nor was this interest in Kendo limited to the introduction.  Again and again the documentary came back to footage of Kendo experts.  Actors appeared on screen and testified that they had been diligently trained in the art of kendo in preparation for their roles.  Fight choreographers testified that what audiences were watching in various iconic duels (such as Count Duku’s showdown with Yoda) was in fact kendo.  The documentary even came to a close with footage of the American Kendo team being defeated by the South Koreans in the 16th World Kendo Championship.

By the end of the documentary it was clear that audiences were expected to have absorbed a single message.  The fantasy of lightsaber combat was based on a real martial art.  It had been practiced and drilled and actually performed for them on film.  And that art was kendo, the swordsmanship of the Samurai.

This is a fascinating development in the way that the creators of Star Wars stories (now owned by Disney) have decided to talk about their efforts.  An Asian martial art has seemingly been fully embraced and acknowledged as the root of Star War’s visual power.

Yet is also leaves us with a paradox.  The documentary features so many actual kendo sequences that it would not take an expert to realize that the kendo performed by the masters, and the supposed kendo being choreographed by the actors, bears strikingly little resemblance to each other.  Indeed, the fencing styles used in the various Star Wars films shows heavy inflection from a wide variety of martial arts styles (including European Longsword, Wushu and Filipino arts) as well as different schools of stage combat choreography and a generous dose of special effects wizardry.

Earlier discussions of the lightsabers by the film’s creators did not share this same emphasis on the appropriation of kendo, or any other Asian martial art.  Even a few years earlier they tended to treat the creation of lightsabers as mostly a special effects challenge.  Yet clearly a demand to identify and explore the “reality” behind the lightsaber has been identified.

Perhaps the most interesting moment of the ESPN documentary occurred when Gillard explained how Kendo had come to be put on the screen.  He started by demonstrating a simple overhead, double handed, strike and parry, exactly as you might actually see it in a kendo class.

He then adapted the same set of movements to show what it would look like in the Star Wars universe.  This involved manipulating the sword with a single hand, using different angles, and finally spinning it behind the martial artist’s back in a movement that many Chinese students call the “plum blossom.”  The same movement was used so many times (often somewhat inexplicably) in the prequels that practitioners of lightsaber combat have started to refer to it as “the Obi-Ani.”

The audience is left with no doubt that the new and improved sequence is vastly more entertaining than the original that (may have) inspired it.  It is faster, flashier and requires far greater dexterity to perform.  In line with Eco’s argument, it identified what was interesting about traditional swordsmanship and then offered the audience “more.”

This throws Gillard’s subsequent statement into sharp relief.  Note his telling use of tense:

 

“The speed, balance, the violence.  Kendo was everything that the Jedi and Sith are.”

 

Once kendo has been “improved” to the point that it is no longer present, except in a few opening stances or generic movements, what are we watching?  This puzzle is precisely what drives students of lightsaber combat to try and locate the mythical Seven Forms of Lightsaber Combat in the films, rather than to read the movements in terms of an existing martial arts style, as this recent documentary would seem to demand.

All of this suggests a growing appetite for “authenticity” and a deeper engagement between Star Wars and the martial arts.  Casual fans want to know more about the martial arts that went into the making of these films, both as storytelling elements and on a technical level.  At the same time students of lightsaber combat are demanding a greater degree of in-universe coherence in the various fencing sequences featured on film and in other supporting media (videogames, cartoons, novels, comic books).

In this essay we have traveled far down the rabbit hole of hyper-reality.  One is now forced to wonder what direction these searches for “authenticity” will take us next.  It seems possible that the very success of the lightsaber duel has created a demand for something new.  The next film to be released, Rogue One, will revolve around a bloody ground battle fought by normal, non-Force sensitiveness, beings.

It seems unlikely that it will feature a lightsaber duel of any kind.  But we can be sure that the Asian martial arts will be present.  Not only will Donnie Yen appear in this film, but a scene from the recently released teaser trailer shows him putting down multiple Storm Troopers while armed only with a wooden staff.

In this new search for authenticity we may find the Star Wars franchise taking a step away from its own highly successful brand of hyper-real martial arts, in an effort to recapture some of the original excellence and energy that launched this enterprise close to 40 years ago.  It seems that the franchise may yet be willing to accept its identity as a quintessential martial arts story.

 

Donnie Yen. The calm before he the storm...

Donnie Yen. The calm before he the storm…

 

 

oOo

 

If you enjoyed this essay you might also want to see:  Through a Lens Darkly (20): Ip Man Confronts the “Indian” Police Officer

 

oOo


Chinese Martial Arts in the News: April 25th, 2016: Tourism, Weapons Based MMA and Old School Kung Fu

$
0
0

Introduction

Welcome to “Chinese Martial Arts in the News.”  This is a semi-regular feature here at Kung Fu Tea in which we review media stories that mention or affect the traditional fighting arts.  In addition to discussing important events, this column also considers how the Asian hand combat systems are portrayed in the mainstream media.

While we try to summarize the major stories over the last month, there is always a chance that we have missed something.  If you are aware of an important news event relating to the TCMA, drop a link in the comments section below.  If you know of a developing story that should be covered in the future feel free to send me an email.

Its been a while (almost a month) since our last update so there is a lot to be covered in today’s post.  Let’s get to the news!

A Taijiquan performance by visiting martial artists from neighboring China in Chungju South Korea.  Source:

A Taijiquan performance by visiting martial artists from neighboring China in Chungju South Korea. Source:

Notes From All Over
Our first story this week originates in Korea.  Its no secret that martial arts related tourism is an ever-growing industry.  Discussions of it here at Kung Fu Tea tend to focus on the motivations and mechanisms by which individuals from the West travel to Asia.  Yet there is also a booming inter-regional trade.  One South Korean city seems to have found a way to attract ever growing numbers of Chinese tourists to its various martial arts centers and attractions.  How?

“Chungju has just the pedigree, as the home of the oldest Korean martial arts “taekgyeon.”

Chungju has also been hosting the World Martial Arts Festival since 1998. And it is a birthplace for the World Martial Arts Union (WoMAU), an international martial arts organization that counts 60 martial arts organizations from 40 countries as its members….

With this background, providing a stage for Chinese tourists to showcase their martial arts skills was not a difficult choice, according to Cho. The city believes exploring this niche market of martial arts tourism will provide memorable experiences to the visitors.

“We have assets of martial arts and we want to use them,” Cho said. “We are trying to vitalize tourism where visitors can actually engage in activities they like.”

 

Students train at a Wushu Academy in Henan Province.  Source: SCMP.com

Students train at a Wushu Academy in Henan Province. Source: SCMP.com

Our next story was written by frequent guest author and friend of Kung Fu Tea, Sascha Matuszak.  It is a shorter feature as it is just one part of a multi-part series that he did on Zhengzhou for the South China Morning Post, but it will be of interest to readers.  In it he discusses the growing fortunes of some of Henan’s many Wushu Academies.  After a period in which their viability was being questioned, he notes that many of these institutions have managed to diversify their pool of students, instructors, and the sorts of martial arts training that they offer.  Additionally a growing number of students who attend these schools have career plans that fall outside of the traditional industries that they fed graduates into in years past (professional wushu, the military etc…)

 

Lightweight but strong armor, wired with computer sensors, may allow for the birth of a new class of weapons based combat sports.  Source:

Lightweight but strong armor, wired with computer sensors, may allow for the birth of a new class of weapons based combat sports. Source: The Economist.

 

The Economist recently ran an article titled “Modern gladiators: New body armour promises to transform fighting sports.” It discusses a firm which has created a new type of highly protective body armor that is wired with various sorts of computer sensors.  These allow the suit to absorb weapons based attacks and determine the severity of the resulting injury (which presumably the armor will also prevent).  Obviously this opens up all sorts of avenues for “reality based” weapons training, and multiple armed forces have expressed interest in the project.  But the creators seem to see its real future in the creation of a new type of weapons based Mixed Martial Art.   If this gets off the ground it will be interesting to see whether it remains a contest between styles, or if it births a new hybrid style of its own (as happened in unarmed MMA environment).

“The first official fights, which are being branded as the Unified Weapons Master, will begin later this year in Australia, with competitions expanding to America in 2017.

Nationalistic fervour will be part of the entertainment mix. Martial arts from different cultures, such as Japanese swordsmanship and Chinese staff fighting, will be pitted against each other. Shen “War Demon” Meng, a Beijing fighter who used a particularly ruthless form of kung fu known as “eagle claw” in the Wellington trials, believes the system lends an air of superhero to the martial arts. He also liked the fact there was less need for a referee to have to step in and stop the fight to prevent injury, and that reviewing the detailed fight data afterwards was good for improving his technique.”

 

An article in New China recently noted that a Chinese martial arts expert in the UK is inspiring British firms to hire older workers.  71 year old Milton Keyne has been a practicing martial artist for the last 55 years.  He has just been hired as the oldest Fitness trainer in the UK by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in a drive to raise awareness of the talents of more senior workers.  Congratulations are in order!  Hopefully his career will also inspire younger martial artist to take better care of their joints so that we too can be just as active 50 years down the line.

 

Kung Fu Soft Power in Africa.  Source:

Kung Fu Soft Power in Africa. Source: http://www.globaltimes.com

 

The role of the martial arts in promoting a state’s image abroad (and how that can be manipulated through the techniques of “public diplomacy”) is a topic that I find endlessly fascinating.  It probably has something to do with my background in International Relations.  As such I am always on the lookout for a good “Kung Fu Diplomacy” story.  This week provided a couple of nice examples of the genera.

The first was titled “Kung Fu Soft Power in Africa.”  It was basically a short editorial looking at the changing public perception of the Chinese martial arts on the continent.  Its worth taking a look at if that is a topic which interests you.

 

Tiger Shroff, who has recently generated controversy with his remarks about the Indian origins of the Chinese Martial Arts.  Source:

Tiger Shroff, who has recently generated controversy with his remarks about the Indian origins of the Chinese Martial Arts. Source:

 

The Indian actor Tiger Shroff, has been making waves recently with some statements about the ultimately Indian origins of the Chinese martial arts.  In a fascinating bit of cultural appropriation he has claimed that Kung Fu (which apparently means all of the Chinese martial arts) are really Indian in origin because…(you guessed it)…Bodhidharma went to the Shaolin Temple.

This is hardly a novel claim.  It has even been widely repeated within the Chinese martial arts community (often with an aim towards explaining why the arts of Wudang are “authentically Chinese” while those of Shaolin are not).  Nor does it matter that this is one of the most debunked narratives in all of Chinese martial arts history.  [For the record Bodhidharma did not bring the martial arts to Shaolin, and he almost certainly never actually visited the temple.  But its still a fascinating story that Meir Shahar has discussed in great depth.]

However, Shroff’s statements have hit a nationalist nerve in China and generated some discussion.  And that is now being widely reported in the Indian press.  All of which is a good illustration of why it is a problem when the history of the comparatively modern martial arts gets reduced down to supposedly “timeless” ethno-lingustic mythic narratives.

 

Good Samaritan faces multiple years in prison after intervening in an assault.  Source: Daily Mail.

Good Samaritan faces multiple years in prison after intervening in an assault. Source: Daily Mail.

 

The Daily Mail is reporting that a Kung Fu student in China is facing multiple years in jail after he attempted to intervene on behalf of a woman who was being sexually harassed.  The intervention escalated into a full scale fight between the two leaving the harasser seriously injured, and the woman supposedly fled before giving a police report.  While the details of this case are not entirely clear, it does appear to be a fascinating example of the interaction between law enforcement, society and the martial arts community in China today.

 

Shaolin Monks.block

One of 13 Spectacular Pictures of Shaolin Students. Source: http://tribune.com.pk

 
The Shaolin Temple is (among other things) the institution that has launched a thousand photo-essays.  The latest entry in the genera comes from the pages of the Express Tribune.  Who ever selected these pictures seems to have had a strong attraction to more geometric motifs!  Check them out here.

 

 

Custom Graflex lightsabers, similar to those used in the original Star Wars by Luke Skywalker.  Source: The Verge

Custom Graflex lightsabers, similar to those used in the original Star Wars by Luke Skywalker. Source: The Verge

 

As Lightsaber Combat (a hyper-real martial art) is now one of my research areas, I have decided to keep an eye open for Star Wars related news stories that might be of interest.  One of the issues that my recent blog-posts on LSC highlighted was the importance of materiality.  Specifically, the marketing of high quality replica lightsabers, more than any other single factor, seems to have driven the development of this new set of practices.  Of course, most of the stunt sabers that performers and martial artists use are relatively primitive compared to the examples that you will see this article and the accompanying video feature.  If you wonder what the world of very top-end lightsabers is like, you need to check this out (and bring your wallet)!

 

Zheng Manqing, the teacher of William Chen, with sword, possibly on the campus of Columbia University in New York City.

Zheng Manqing, the teacher of William Chen, with sword, possibly on the campus of Columbia University in New York City.

 

Chinese Martial Arts in Film

 

It looks like we are about to get the Zheng Manqing (Cheng Man-ch’ing) documentary that so many of us have been waiting for.  The new film is titled “The Professor: Tai Chi’s Journey West” and it is directed by Barry Strugatz (who, in addition to being a professional film person, has also studied with some of Zheng’s students).  You can also follow the project’s progress on facebook.  The documentary will premier in Los Angeles on May 6 and in New York City on June 9.  Look for an advance review here at Kung Fu Tea sometime in the next week!

Jackie Chan in Rumble in the Bronx.  Source: Indiewire.

Jackie Chan in Rumble in the Bronx. Source: Indiewire.

 

The Old School Kung Fu Film Fest is returning to New York City for its sixth season, and it will be featuring some of the finest Asian grindhouse treasures in this year’s screenings.  This is definitely something to follow.  What can you expect at this year’s festival?

“Get limber, because New York’s Old School Kung Fu Fest is back in action and more bruising than ever. Overseen by Subway Cinema (the NYC genre gurus who mastermind the city’s indispensable New York Asian Film Festival), the series is a portal to a glorious past where every fight scene was choreographed with the grace of a hyper-violent ballet and every kick crackled on the soundtrack like a bolt of lightning. And the sixth edition of OSKFF promises to be the best yet, as Subway Cinema has partnered with the recently opened Metrograph theater so that all of these wild treasures can be screened in 35mm.

This year’s fest celebrates Golden Harvest, the legendary Hong Kong studio that rivaled the Shaw brothers and ruled Kung Fu cinema from the ’70s until the ’90s.”

 

touch of zen.5

The Kung Fu classics are also gracing the pages of the New York Times.  It notes that ‘A Touch of Zen’ (one of my favorites) will be playing at the Film Forum through May 5th.  And if you are a newcomer to the world of “Rivers and Lakes” (or you just need a refresher course) the Wall Street Journal recently ran a piece titled “Kung Fu Movie Viewing, Made Easy.”  Get yourself up to speed as the film festival season kicks off.

 

 

Scrabble

 

Martial Arts Studies
Recently I published a couple of posts exploring various definitions of the martial arts and attempted to apply them to a “hard case.”  Nevertheless, there is nothing obvious or neutral about the process of defining our terms, particularly in academia.  As Paul Bowman responds in the following short essay, there is a solid case to be “Against Defining the Martial Arts.”  This is a brief paper on an important topic, and I highly recommend it for anyone who wants to think more deeply about how we should go about studying the martial arts.

 

Chinese Martial Arts Cinema by Stephen Teo (Edinburgh University Press, 2009).

Chinese Martial Arts Cinema by Stephen Teo (Edinburgh University Press, 2009).

 

Is Chinese Martial Arts Cinema Underexamined or Undervalued?”  That is the central question which occupies this essay discussing the upcoming second (and expanded) edition of Stephen Teo’s now classic work, Chinese Martial Arts Cinema: The Wuxia Tradition.  If you read the footnotes of a lot of what is being written in martial arts studies today you will see Teo’s name in all sorts of places.  As such the second edition of this book will be a welcome addition to the personal libraries of many scholars.

 
Chinese Martial Arts.Peter Lorge
Prof. Peter Lorge’s single volume history of the Chinese Martial Arts (Cambridge, 2012) has been getting some increased public discussion lately.  This also seems to be connected to the greater popular awareness of martial arts studies as a research area.  Readers may want to take note of this recent review.  I did, however, note the degree to which the reviewer dismissed the civilian aspect of the Chinese martial arts in favor of the more “intellectually respectable” discipline of military history.  While we are making progress we still have a ways to go:

“Author Peter Lorge, a history professor at Vanderbilt University, has written an intriguing and thorough history of martial arts in China. Readers interested in military history or the nation of China will find this a rewarding book.

An important distinction for readers to be aware of is that martial arts literally mean the arts of war. Drawing on the written record that stretches back many centuries, Lorge examines how men really fought in battle as well as how subsequent fictional accounts embellished the skills of warriors and heroes. There is much more in this book about the development and use of weapons and battlefield tactics than unarmed fighting techniques or spiritual matters. Readers looking for a critical discussion of the differences between Crane Technique and the Cobra Kai school should look elsewhere.”

 

Lastly, Prof. Jill D. Weinberg (Assistant Professor of Sociology at Tufts University) has released a new book through the University of California Press titled Consensual Violence: Sex, Sports, and the Politics of Injury.  It appears that her central argument will be relevant to multiple strains of discussion that are currently proceeding in martial arts studies.  Here is the publisher’s description of the work:

In this novel approach to understanding consent, Jill D. Weinberg presents two case studies of activities in which participants engage in violent acts: competitive mixed martial arts (MMA) and sexual sadism and masochism (BDSM). Participants in both cases assent to injury and thereby engage in a form of social decriminalization, using the language of consent to render their actions legally and socially tolerable. Yet, these activities are treated differently under criminal battery law: sports, including MMA, are generally absolved from the charge of criminal battery, whereas BDSM often represents a violation of criminal battery law.

Using interviews and ethnographic observation, Weinberg argues that where law authorizes a person’s consent to an activity, as in MMA, consent is not meaningfully constructed or regulated by the participants themselves. In contrast, where law prohibits a person’s consent to an activity, as in BDSM, participants actively construct and regulate consent.

A synthesis of criminal law and ethnography, Consensual Violence is a fascinating account of how consent is framed among participants engaged in violent acts and lays the groundwork for a sociological understanding of the process of decriminalization.

Chinese_tea,_gancha

Kung Fu Tea on Facebook

 

A lot has happened on the Kung Fu Tea Facebook group over the last few weeks.  We discussed the finer points of the Wing Chun pole form, examined some martial arts studies conference reports, and thought about the meaning of failure in the traditional hand combat systems. Joining the Facebook group is also a great way of keeping up with everything that is happening here at Kung Fu Tea.

If its been a while since your last visit, head on over and see what you have been missing.


Martial Arts History, Without Chronology

$
0
0
An astronomical clock in Prague. Photo by Andrew Shiva. Source: wikimedia.

An astronomical clock in Prague. Photo by Andrew Shiva. Source: wikimedia.

 

 

 

Your mission, should choose to accept it…

 

Recently I have been invited to contribute chapters to a number of upcoming projects.  I am still attempting to decide what some of these should be, but in two cases the editors of the volumes in question have approached me with specific requests.  For instance, in the next few months I am going to be putting together a generously sized chapter on the history of the Chinese martial arts.

This is a great opportunity, especially as I am coming off a major project of my own and have been thinking about the social history of these fighting systems for a few years.  And it is nice to be presented with a very specific brief.  It saves one the mental energy of having to dream up a project that will fit the larger mission of an edited volume while still advancing your own research agenda.  That can be a tricky. Finally, after spending so much time on regional and local history, it will be nice to get a chapter out articulating a more global view of the Chinese martial arts.

Still, an assignment like this is not without its challenges.  Over the last week I started to do some background reading and research.  That basically means rereading the classic books, looking for new publications, revisiting some of my favorite articles and reviewing what I have already said about the topic elsewhere.  This sort of review is a great way to discover where my personal views have evolved over the last couple of years.

Nor can we afford to ignore some of the very nice treatments of the history of the Chinese martial arts that are already out there.  As I have mentioned before, Stanley Henning’s “The Martial Arts in Chinese Physical Culture, 1865-1965” in Green and Svinth’s Martial Arts  in the Modern World (Praeger, 2003) provides a great introduction to the subject.  It has always been my “go-to” recommendation for someone who thinks they might be interested in learning more about Chinese martial arts history.

More committed readers would do well to check out Lorge’s Chinese Martial Arts (Cambridge, 2011) for the best single volume treatment of the subject.  And those interested in delving deeper into the Republican period (the era I find to be the most interesting) must familiarize themselves with Andrew Morris’ chapter on the topic in Marrow of the Nation (California UP, 2004). Interested readers already have a number of good options to draw on as they explore the development of the Chinese martial arts.

Yet as I reread these and other sources over the last week it occurred to me that there is something else that these works have in common besides their quality.  All of them present a fairly linear, straight forward, account of the development of the modern Chinese martial arts.  Various authors might choose different start and finish dates, yet the feeling of chronological progression pervades all of these works, especially as we come to the more “modern” eras.

This is quite understandable.  In many ways the present really is a product of the past.  It is not unreasonable to see a degree of casualty in the march of time.  Yet if we are not careful our accounting of chronology can quickly slip into a sort of martial teleology, where these fighting systems are inexorably drawn through history, shaped by shadowy forces, and destined to assume some predetermined final form.

This tendency is most clearly visible in some (though not all) historical accounts produced by academics in mainland China.   In this case the source of their theoretical slant is fairly obvious.  The Marxist forces of “historic materialism,” that are believed to have shaped every other social institution, have evolved the Chinese martial arts from a state of lower barbarism (e.g., there is a very good reason that so many of these histories begin with totally improbably accounts of kung fu having been invented to fend off wild animals) and ending with the inevitable triumph of state sponsored Wushu.

I have discussed the shortcomings of these sorts of accounts elsewhere. As students of martial arts studies we should acknowledge that national sponsorship of, and involvement with, the martial arts has often been a powerful force in reshaping them to fit the perceived needs of the state.  These same social and political forces have also had a powerful impact on the ways these arts are discussed in some corners of the scholarly literature.

Nor are these tendencies restricted to socialist states.  Indeed, the demands of modernization and nationalism (as seen in cases of 20th century Japan, Korea and Indonesia among others) have also had a substantive effect on how the martial arts of these states are viewed by their citizens and discussed by scholars.  One suspects that even modernization and secularization theory (touchstones of sociological thought in the West) have had a profound (and less visible) effect on the ways that the martial arts are discussed among scholars.

The unavoidable problem in all of this is the necessity of simplification.  The martial arts of even a single country (in my case China) are a frightening large subject.  Nor are trends always headed in the same direction.  A close examination of the “facts on the ground” will show that many individuals can be seen to harness these social institutions in the pursuit of their own agendas.  For every reformer that advances in public sphere another teacher will emerge demanding a return to a remembered or (more likely) imagined past.

Making sense of this mass of often contradictory data is the job of a historian, and some sort of theoretical framework is the intellectual tool that is employed in doing that.  As such we cannot avoid the necessity of either simplification or theory.  Yet is a linear chronological framework, heavily inflected with either modernist, nationalist or Marxist assumptions the best way forward?  To answer that question we would first have to consider some alternatives.

 

Clockwork gears at the Liverpool World Museum. Photo by Somedriftwood. Source: Wikimedia

Clockwork gears at the Liverpool World Museum. Photo by Somedriftwood. Source: Wikimedia

 

 

 

Ordering Principals: The Levels of Analysis

 

The “Levels of Analysis” is a conceptual tool that students of sociology and political science have used for grouping and evaluating families of theories for decades.  I have discussed different variants of this idea in previous posts.  It may also be able to offer some insight into our current dilemma.

The Levels of Analysis framework traditionally suggests that sociological theories can be divided into three (or possibly four) categories.  In my field these are “systemic” theories (those that seek to understand the nature of complex systems as a whole), “institutional or domestic” explanations (attempts to understand the roles of various social groups) and lastly “individual level analysis” (typically focusing on cognition, decision making and psychology).  While the passage of time does not vanish in any of these categories, it can be understood in different contexts and in less reductive ways.

Let us begin by considering some approaches to the problem that might be classified as residing at the “systemic” level.  Recent trends in Asian Studies have emphasized the need to move beyond an emphasis on events in individual states and to look instead at the complex political, social and economic interactions that were often affecting an entire region.  For instance, during the 19th and early 20th centuries, events and attitudes in Japan and China were not as independent from each other as many nationally focused histories would have us believe.  Developments in one state often had a profound influence on every country in the region.

This was certainly true of the Chinese martial arts community.  Reformers were very much aware of what was happening in Japan.  They noted the Japanese government’s more robust support of Budo with envy.  They were aware of Judo’s growing popularity within the international community.  Tang Hao specifically championed many of their methods during the early days of the Central Guoshu Institute.  Yet very few studies have taken up these influences, and I am aware of no substantial comparative case studies.

Thus one possible approach to the problem might be to reject the notion of writing an isolated history of the Chinese martial arts at all.  Instead a regional study, focusing on why similar trends found often very different expressions in even close neighbors, might be more interesting.  At minimum, developments in China should be plotted against, and compared to, events elsewhere in Asia.  An emphasis on strategic forms of social and political influence would replace simpler notions of the “progress of history.”

Another systemic approach might reject the state or the nation as the ultimate unit of analysis.  In my own research on the Chinese martial arts the urban/rural cleavage that dominated so much of popular culture in the late Qing and Republic eras has emerged as a powerful analytical lens for understanding the essential nature of these fighting systems.

More specifically, this conceptual framework problematizes the assumption that the Chinese martial arts share a single historical trajectory.  While urban reformers in the 1920s and 1930s struggled to create secular and scientific fighting systems at the disposal of the state in its revolutionary struggle, their rural counterparts in northern China were busy creating Red Spear units, employing the martial arts to reinforce local leadership structures and promoting magical practices (such as spirit possession and invulnerability techniques) that had not been seen in the region for generations. Both of these strategies were responses to the economic and social strains of “modernization.” Yet they suggest that single linear narratives of the “evolution” of the Chinese martial arts are leaving out some of the most important parts of the story.

The situation is similar at the domestic level of analysis.  Perhaps the most obvious approach here would be to focus on the state/society cleavage.  Indeed, the nature of the martial arts at specific points in time might be a valuable tool for understanding exactly how much influence that state actually commanded.  It might then be possible to group together periods when the state was particularly strong or weak, and to think more carefully about the impact that this had on the development of the martial arts.  Such an approach might also reveal underlying patterns in the relationship between the civilian martial arts and the realm of civil society that might not otherwise be apparent.

The domestic level of analysis is often said to include norms or beliefs about how various social institutions should function.  A discussion of the martial arts in the modern period could be organized by the emergence of certain strains of thought at various points in time.  The popularity of modernist philosophies has come and gone.  Likewise, the fortunes of certain notes of cultural fundamentalism have risen and fallen.  How can these trends (not all of which are linear in nature) help us to understand the history of the Chinese martial arts?

It is not hard to imagine what an “individual level” approach to this problem might look like.  “Great man” biographies have been the stock and trade of historical accounts for decades.  Their stories provide a level of granular discussion and detail that is often missing from systemic or institutionally focused accounts.  Not only can this give us a sense of what it was like to actually be a martial artist at a given moment in history, it can speak directly to the sequence of events leading up to important moments of change.

Nor do the Chinese martial arts lack for important figures demanding greater examination.  Sun Lutang has always struck me as a seminal figure whose life illustrates many important trends in the Chinese martial arts.  In the South Gu Ruzhang plays a similar role.  Likewise the career of the groundbreaking historian Tang Hao, while tragic, illustrates critical trends in the social discussion of the Chinese martial arts.

The challenge with biography is extrapolating from the realm of specific events to general conclusions.  And the life of any single subject is limited in length compared to the scope of even the recent history of the Chinese martial arts.  Still, the social and highly networked nature of this community suggests that if a historian were to skillfully choose two or three figures whose lives intersected, it might be possible to tell much of the story of the modern martial arts while remaining grounded in actual biographical detail.

Nor should historians feel the need to focus only on famous personalities.  Students writing social histories might gain inspiration from the lives of lesser known figures such as the reluctant rebel Zhao San-duo, Fei Ching Po (an ill-fated professional gambler) or the southern martial arts teacher Li Pei Xin. Marginal individuals often face similar struggles, and turn to the martial arts for remarkably similar reasons, even at different points in history.  This illustrates some important structural facts about these fighting systems and their role in Chinese society.  Indeed, some of these patterns have proved remarkably resistant to the “march of history.”

 

Deconstructed clock gears. Public Domain. Source: Wikimedia.

Deconstructed clock gears. Public Domain. Source: Wikimedia.

 

 

 

Conclusion: Moving Beyond the Levels of Analysis

 

Each of these approaches to discussing the development of the Chinese martial arts has strengths and weaknesses.  None of them are perfect.  As with all such frameworks, each will leave out some part of the story while drawing our attention to a variable that is usually neglected.  This is the original sin of all theory.  I suppose that it can also be thought of as “employment insurance” for academic writers as it strongly suggests that a single account of a phenomenon will never be satisfying.  Students will always prefer to have (and debate) a variety of perspectives.

Perhaps the greatest benefit in moving away from a purely chronological account of the development of the Chinese martial arts is simply to present these systems in a new and exciting way.  One that will spark renewed interest and novel insights on the part of the reader.  They might also move us out of the realm of teleology, reminding us that these fighting systems have been many things in the past, they constitute a vastly complicated realm in the present, and they are likely to take on many new forms in the future.

The conclusions of Marxist or modernist historians notwithstanding, the development of these systems has never been linear so much as it has been “rhizomatic.”  When one pathway has been obstructed seemingly dormant and forgotten possibilities have sprung forth.  While we can always reconstruct a linear “just so” story about how we got here, I doubt that the same logic would ever allow us to extrapolate very far into the future.

Nor should we forget that there is more to the Chinese martial arts than states, voluntary associations and individual practitioners.  Beliefs about these practices have also been carried throughout history on the powerful currents of vernacular opera, wuxia novels and most recently film.  Indeed, the very thought that something now “lost” must once have existed has proved to be a powerful incentive to engage in the re-invention of “tradition” within the Chinese martial arts.

It would be hard to imagine the state of the modern martial arts in China today without the release of the Shaolin Temple in the early 1980s, or Jin Yong’s various novels in Hong Kong.  The Chinese martial arts exist in a perpetual state of revival precisely because individuals find social meaning in the act of reviving them.  They are seen as a source of cultural heritage because they have been accepted as such by vast audiences who do not practice them and know them only by their media representations.  Nor is the current situation all that different from the world of professional story tellers, operas and wuxia novels in the 19th century.

Finding a way to better integrate these discussions of media discourse and popular culture into individual, institutional and systemic histories remains a challenge.  It is difficult to construct a single framework that can account for both institutional and cultural variables.

Frequently cultural trends appear within accounts of practicing martial artists as exogenous shocks (or vice versa).  Understanding how to bring these two types of discussions together is one of the more important challenges facing martial arts studies as an interdisciplinary field.  As we structure our regional accounts, institutional explanations, or biographical explorations of the martial arts, we cannot afford to lose sight of their origins and place in popular culture.

 

oOo

 

If you enjoyed this essay you might also want to read:  The Book Club: Chinese Kung Fu by Wang Guangxi



oOo

 


The Creation of Wing Chun – Now in Paperback!

$
0
0
The Creation of Wing Chun by Judkins and Nielson.

The Creation of Wing Chun by Judkins and Nielson.

 

 

I recently received a letter from SUNY Press letting me know that The Creation of Wing Chun: A Social History of the Southern Chinese Martial Arts, will soon be released in paperback.  This is wonderful news and due in no small part to the enthusiastic support we received from members of the Wing Chun community and Kung Fu Tea readers.  While the original hardcover edition of this book was quite expensive (at a suggested retail price of $90) the publisher actually had trouble keeping up with demand for it.  I am sure that this inspired them to make the book more widely available.

This brings us to our next big announcement.  SUNY Press is currently having a substantial sale on all of their Asian Studies titles, including our book!  If you order through their webpage and use the coupon code ZAAS16 before May 12th you can get up to 40% off the cost of a hardback edition, or 20% off your pre-order of the soft-cover (which is due to ship on or before July 1).  That brings the price of the hardback down to about $54 and the paperback to a very comfortable $22.  We are confident this new release and sale will make our study of the Southern Chinese martial arts available to much larger audiences who may not have had easy access to a university library.

To briefly summarize, we review the social, economic, and political forces that fostered the development of Wing Chun and the other southern Chinese hand combat systems.  Our book also provides an extensive biographical discussion of Ip Man looking at both his introduction to the martial arts in Foshan and his subsequent efforts to introduce Wing Chun to a new generation of students (including Bruce Lee) in Hong Kong.  If you would like to learn more about the contents of this book you can read the first chapter here.  However I suspect that this interview, which we did with Gene Ching of Kung Fu Tai Chi magazine, will probably give you a better sense of our aims and the book’s contents.

Readers interested in the theoretical questions which drive this project may also want to watch my keynote address at the 2015 Martial Arts Studies conference titled “Imagining Ip Man: Globalization and the Growth of Wing Chun Kung Fu.”  Lastly, Douglas Wile wrote a review of the volume from a martial arts studies perspective.  Collectively these sources should give you a pretty good sense of the topics we covered in this project.

 

Ip Man and his best known student, Bruce Lee.

Ip Man and his best known student, Bruce Lee.



Doing Research (6): Working the Beat – One Journalist’s Efforts at Perfecting the Fine Art of Hanging Out

$
0
0
A young TY Wong, right, at the 1928 Central Goushu Institute's national martial arts demonstration in Nanjing, China. Source: From the Collection of Charles Russo.

A young TY Wong, right, at the 1928 Central Goushu Institute’s national martial arts demonstration in Nanjing, China. Source: From the Collection of Charles Russo.

 

Introduction

 

Welcome to the sixth entry in our series of guest posts titled “Doing Research.”  If you missed the first essay by D. S. Farrer (which provides a global overview of the subject), the second by Daniel Mroz (how to select a school or teacher for research purposes), the third by  Jared Miracle (learning new martial arts systems while immersed in a foreign culture), the fourth by Thomas Green (who is only in it for the stories), or the fifth by Daniel Amos (who discusses some lies he has told about martial artists) be sure to check them out!

Compared to other fields of scholarly inquiry, Martial Arts Studies has a distinctly democratic flavor.  Many individuals are introduced to these systems while students at a college or university and are interested in seeing a more intellectually rigorous treatment of their interests.  And certain practitioners want to go beyond reading studies produced by other writers and undertake research based on their own time in the training hall.   The emphasis on ethnographic description, oral and local history, as well as the methodological focus on community based collaborative research within Martial Arts Studies (itself a radically interdisciplinary area), makes participation in such efforts both relatively accessible and highly valuable.  Or maybe you are a student about to embark on your first ethnographic research project?  If so it pays to think about how you will approach your fieldwork.

Charles Russo is unique among the authors in this series in that he approaches this subject not as an ethnographer or academic student, but as a professional journalist.  As such he brings a different perspective to the conversation, one based on the years of experience that reporters have accumulated in figuring out how to “work a beat.”  In fact, doing long-term research within a martial art community is a lot like working a beat.  And journalists have produced some of my favorite books on the history and nature of the fighting arts (such as the classic discussion of Tae Kwon Do, A Killing Art by Alex Gillis).  Given that Russo has just completed an important volume titled Striking Distance: Bruce Lee and the Dawn of Martial Arts in America, published by the University of Nebraska Press (2016), he is well positioned to discuss the intersection of these various approaches to field work.

 

The Sturdy Citizen's Club circa 1965. TY Wong, top row second from right, with students in his basement studio in San Francisco's Chinatown. Source: From the collection of Charles Russo.

The Sturdy Citizen’s Club circa 1965. TY Wong, top row second from right, with students in his basement studio in San Francisco’s Chinatown. Source: From the collection of Charles Russo.

 

 

Working the Beat: One Journalist’s Efforts at Perfecting the Fine Art of Hanging Out

 

So I’m up to my elbows in cobwebs chasing down a dead man in a nearby Necropolis…and to be honest, it’s all really a lot of fun.

Let me rephrase that: I’m in Gilman Wong’s garage in the city of Colma, California, trying to find a picture of his dad – TY Wong. For almost a century now, San Francisco has buried its dead in the city of Colma, just a couple miles to the south. At present, there are about 1,500 living souls in Colma and 1.5 million dead ones. That’s quite a ratio, and driving over to Gilman’s house past the massive graveyards, it’s easy enough to daydream in the direction of a zombie apocalypse.

TY Wong (or, Wong Tim Yuen) is one of the pioneering martial artists that I profile in my book, Striking Distance: Bruce Lee and the Dawn of Martial Arts in America.  A Sil Lum master who was quickly recruited by the local branch of the Hop Sing Tong upon his arrival to San Francisco, TY – along with his senior contemporary Lau Bun – oversaw the martial arts culture in Chinatown for more than a quarter century. Despite his many key contributions to the martial arts in America, TY has mostly fallen through the cracks of popular memory. So now, I’m in the graveyard city of Colma, trying to pull him out.

It’s taken me two years to get in touch with TY’s son Gilman. And after letters and phone calls and go-betweens, here we are in his garage dusting the cobwebs off of a photo from the 1940s in a broken frame beneath cracked glass…and it’s a real gem.

If you would ask who my favorite practitioner was that I profiled in my book about the pioneering martial arts scene on San Francisco Bay in the early 1960s, I’d have a hard time settling on just one person. From the old guard in Chinatown, to the innovators in Oakland, to a young trash-talking Bruce Lee, one figure was more compelling than the next. But when it comes to photographs, all of my favorites seem to involve TY Wong.

There’s the 1965 photograph of of him with seven teenage students in his Chinatown school: the Kin Mon Physical Culture Studio (or, The Sturdy Citizen’s Club). Here, TY is pictured next to his one white student at the time: Irish teenager Noel O’Brien. Beginning in 1960 with Al Novak, TY was known to accept the occasional non-Chinese student despite the prevailing exclusionary etiquette of the times.

A true martial artist, there is also the photograph of TY playing the violin in his living room (“he was self-taught,” according to Gilman). But best of all, is the image of TY at the 1928 Central Guoshu Institute’s national tournament in Nanjing, China. TY is on the right in a tai chi pose, with his teacher Long Tin Chee in the center, and senior student Chew Lung on the far left. It’s just a beautiful glimpse of martial arts history, and up to now that image has been my standout favorite.

However, looking through the cracked glass at this photograph of TY, it might just be a contender for my new front-runner. It’s a parade scene from San Francisco in the 1940s, and TY is surrounded by a large team of martial artists. He stands at the center of the entire congregation all in black, holding butterfly swords. Despite the many men around him and his slim stature, TY looks quietly authoritative and formidable.

Gilman and I retrieve this image and several others from the garage, including what we originally came for – the photos from the Arlene Francis show (more on that later). We then proceed inside to talk shop for a few hours. As I said, it’s all quite a lot of fun.

 

TY Wong standing with butterfly swords, center, during a San Francisco street parade during the 1940s. Source: Photo courtesy of Gilman Wong.

TY Wong standing with butterfly swords, center, during a San Francisco street parade during the 1940s. Source: Photo courtesy of Gilman Wong.

 

Celebrated veteran journalist Gay Talese once said that good journalism is predicated on “mastering the fine art of hanging out”…which of course, is possibly the least academic sentiment ever written, though that’s not to say it’s without merit.

Working a beat as a journalist is a simple enough concept. It means to cover a particular topic thoroughly and on a consistent basis. You get to know the people, the places, the issues, and the nuance by frequently putting yourself in close proximity to them. In this sense, Talese was talking about investing enough time so that something or someone can be seen from many angles; the myriad facets beyond the cultivated identity that is projected to the world.

For my book, I applied a beat reporter’s approach to this particular era of martial arts history. I suppose that is a more formal way of articulating my efforts at perfecting the hangout. Whatever you want to call it, here are a few aspects of the approach that seem the most essential.

Bruce Lee.LB

Bruce with his new girlfriend (and future wife) Linda Emery, along with James Lee, Ed Parker, and Ed Jr., outside the Long Beach Municipal Auditorium in December of 1963, where Parker was set to launch his inaugural tournament. Bruce and Linda had traveled south from Seattle to Pasadena over Christmas recess (picking up James Lee in Oakland along the way) presumably to watch the Huskies in the Rose Bowl. But really, Bruce just wanted an excuse to visit Ed Parker. Source: Photo courtesy of the Parker Family.

 

The Horse’s Mouth

 

While studying History (for my grad and undergrad) I kept noticing something peculiar. It was constantly being explained to me how important primary sources were, of seeking out the accounts of people who experienced events first-hand. Yet, there was zero emphasis on actually talking to those people. You could read their books or archived papers, but no one ever picked up the phone to speak with them directly. Once, when a classmate was discussing his questions about the aging author of a labor struggle memoir, I blurted out – “Why don’t you just call him?” The whole seminar turned around in shock and glared at me, as if I had said – “Why don’t you just assassinate him?”

Over in the journalism department, it was the opposite. My professors berated me for not having enough sources, for not trying hard enough to track people down. It knocked me out of my comfort zone, but in the long run I knew they were right. After all, you can’t ask follow up questions to a book, only to it’s author.

In 2012, tai chi master James Wing Woo published a really nice book about his career and method, titled SIFU. Woo was a perennial figure of the West coast martial arts scene dating back to the late 1930s. His book contains a short interview conducted by well-known journalist Ben Fong-Torres, in which Woo comments briefly on his time amid the martial arts culture of San Francisco’s Chinatown, including his experiences with Lau Bun and TY Wong. Upon reading this, I instantly had a wealth of questions for Woo, and living up to my history seminar point-of-view, I contacted James and was down at his studio in Los Angeles four days later. Woo answered all of my questions, explaining the delicate relationship between TY Wong and Lau Bun, the culture of Chinatown’s little-known Ghee Yau Seah (“The Soft Arts Academy”), and the quiet resurgence of opium in the neighborhood throughout the 1940s. He also conveyed some incredible stories of how TY Wong was the Hop Sing Tong’s go-to enforcer for whenever U.S. servicemen on shore leave got too rowdy while carousing the neighborhood’s Forbidden City nightclubs.

Sadly, James Wing Woo passed away just a few months after I interviewed him. I hate to think how much more information went with him.

Martial artists, even retired ones, are fairly easy to find. They are almost always tied to a school in some capacity, and tracking them down isn’t that difficult. Someone will refer you to them  if you ask, and they love discussing their careers. This is not always the case with sources. Once while writing an article about the Zodiac Killer, I had to track down a former SFPD Homicide Inspector who retired on bad terms. No web site, no school or association, no interest in being found. That was difficult. Finding a martial artist is not.

 

Long Beach: "He just started trashing people." A young Bruce Lee, bottom row second from left, standing with other presenters at Ed Parker's inaugural Long Beach International Karate Tournament in the summer of 1964. J. Pat Burleson, Bruce Lee, Anthony Mirakian, Jhoon Rhee. Back Row, Left to Right: Allen Steen, George Mattson, Ed Parker, Tsutomu Ohshima, Robert Trias. Source: Photo courtesy of Darlene Parker.

Long Beach: “He just started trashing people.” A young Bruce Lee, bottom row second from left, standing with other presenters at Ed Parker’s inaugural Long Beach International Karate Tournament in the summer of 1964. J. Pat Burleson, Bruce Lee, Anthony Mirakian, Jhoon Rhee. Back Row, Left to Right: Allen Steen, George Mattson, Ed Parker, Tsutomu Ohshima, Robert Trias. Source: Photo courtesy of Darlene Parker.

 

Interview Off the Beaten Path

Here’s a quote you’ve probably never heard before: “People were practically lining up to fight Bruce Lee after his demonstration at Long Beach.”

That’s from Clarence Lee, a karate master who taught in the San Francisco Bay Area for more than 50 years. He was a judge at Ed Parker’s inaugural Long Beach International Tournament in the summer of 1964, and he knew the martial arts culture of the era inside out. They don’t quite make ‘em like Clarence anymore. He is now in his late 80s, has luminous eyes, stark white hair, and curses like a drowning sailor. (When I asked him about the reasons for the Bruce Lee / Wong Jack Man fight, he quickly shot back – “Have you ever heard of macho fucking bullshit?”) I don’t doubt Clarence’s opinion on Long Beach, yet I feel like I’m the only person who has ever really asked him.

In this sense, I think that some of the best and most colorful details often come from the supporting cast, as much as the lead; from the batboy, as much as the All-Star shortstop.

Take Barney Scollan for instance, who was an 18 year-old competitor at Long Beach in ’64. Although Scollan had been disqualified early in the day (“for kicking a guy in the nuts”) he anxiously hung around to watch Bruce Lee, particularly after witnessing his dynamic demo the night before in the hotel. Bruce’s actual tournament demonstration had a far more critical tone from the evening prior, and it struck Scollan as a revelation. “He just started trashing people. He got up there and began to flawlessly imitate all these other styles,” Scollan explains, “and then one-by-one he began to dissect them and explain why they wouldn’t work. And the things he was saying made a lot of sense.”

This is all a bit different from what I had been reading for years on Bruce at Long Beach in 1964. The prevailing narrative has asserted that Bruce did a bunch of fancy stunts, and was so fast and so charismatic that everyone quickly fell in love with him. For some reason, I’ve never been told that Bruce challenged the merit of everyone’s approach, and then half the placed wanted to kick his ass afterwards. There were a lot of people at Long Beach in 1964, is it possible that we’ve been relying on the same few sources over and over, and as a result have failed to grasp the complete story?

Oddly enough, it was another unlikely source –  TY Wong’s student Joe Cervara – who summed this all up for me in a perfect sound bite, when he explained to me that his teacher was never fond of Bruce Lee, and considered him – “A Dissident with Bad Manners.” I’ve had never heard that quote before either.

 

Bruce Lee with Barney Scollan during impromptu demonstrations the night before the first Long Beach International Karate Tournament in 1964. Source: Photo courtesy of Darlene Parker.

Bruce Lee with Barney Scollan during impromptu demonstrations the night before the first Long Beach International Karate Tournament in 1964. Source: Photo courtesy of Darlene Parker.

 

Ask Outside the Box

 

So I’m sitting opposite Dan Inosanto in his office and my first question is simple enough: “Can you tell me about your early martial arts background?” To which he replies, “Yeah, so I first met Bruce in ’64, during the Long Beach….”

I interrupt, “I’m sorry, I wanted to know your background in the martial arts.”

He looks puzzled but a bit relieved, “Oh…ok. Well, my uncle came back from World War II and he started teaching me Okinawan te, they didn’t call it karate back then.”

I cringe to think how many times Dan Inosanto has been asked the same questions regarding Bruce Lee over and over and over. This predictable line of questioning is unfortunate because not only is Dan an encyclopedia of martial arts knowledge, but his CV is literally a who’s-who of early martial arts pioneers in America.

After talking about his earliest days training with his uncle, Inosanto explains his time in the service training with Sergeant Henry Slomanski, an early western karate champion who ran rough-and-tumble training sessions in the U.S. military. Slomanski is one of those often forgotten figures that played a key role in setting the stage for a thriving martial arts culture in America , and Dan Inosanto can talk at length about training with him.

We then move on to his time with kung fu master Ark Wong, and then Ed Parker. When I ask him about Wally Jay, he responds “Well, Wally Jay is sort of like my own personal hero,” before delving into the specifics of the jujitsu master’s exalted career. When I ask him about Leo Fong, he laughs and explains that by coincidence, Fong had actually been his family’s church minister back in Stockton. James Lee? Sure, he remembers James hardening his forearms by banging them against the telephone pole outside Ed Parker’s school in Pasadena. There’s a treasure trove of information here….and to think that I could have vaulted past all of this and just started with, “Tell me when you first met Bruce?”

I once read a piece by William S. Burroughs, written very late in his life, when he said that the questions asked of him by journalists and documentarians had gotten so predictable that he felt inclined to just refer them to other articles and documentaries that already contained the information. In this sense, researchers and journalists need to advance the line of inquiry beyond the obvious.

In Colma, when I arrived at Gilman Wong’s house he a had a variety of images and photo albums laid out on the living the room table, many of which I had seen before. I looked them over and asked, “Are the Arlene Francis photos in here?” He smiles, “No, but I think I have them in the garage.”

In 1955, TY Wong and his students from Kin Mon appeared on the Home show, a popular daytime “magazine program” hosted by Arlene Francis and Hugh Downs. A full decade before Americans were introduced to Kato on The Green Hornet, TY and his Kin Mon students had performed kung fu on NBC. Kin Mon’s appearance on Home is significant not only as a milestone in American martial arts (and broadcast) history, but as yet another prime example of TY evolving the culture beyond the old Tong code of not exhibiting the Chinese martial arts to the non-Chinese.

I don’t think Gilman had ever thought of digging up those particular photos, so it took an alternative line of inquiry to unearth them.

 

Images from TY Wong's Kin Mon school performance on NBC's Home show with Arlene Francis, top left, in 1955. Source: Photo courtesy of Gilman Wong.

Images from TY Wong’s Kin Mon school performance on NBC’s Home show with Arlene Francis, top left, in 1955. Source: Photo courtesy of Gilman Wong.

 

The Myth of the Mundane

 

History isn’t boring. It only seems that way when we’re not looking hard enough.

Think about Colma, for instance. Most people outside of the San Francisco Bay Area have probably never heard of this quiet town two miles south of one of the more colorful cities in the world. Even still, it’s a super interesting place. Consider this: traffic problems in Colma are typically caused by funeral processions. In fact, residents receive text messages to warn them of particularly large ones.

Some of the most notable of Colma’s (deceased) residents include Joe Dimaggio, Wyatt Earp, and William Randolph Hearst.  Many of those who died prior to 1920 were originally buried in San Francisco, before they were (in all-too-modern fashion) priced out of the city’s real estate market, and then relocated to Colma during the middle part of the century.

The advantage of steady beat reporting is that it inevitably shakes the more fascinating details from hiding, even with topics that seem mundane on the surface. And while this can often require a journalist or researcher to take frequent trips back to a certain location, or numerous follow-up interviews with any given source, it seems to always render far more compelling material than first expected.

 

Together with Lau Bun, TY Wong would oversee the martial arts culture in San Francisco's Chinatown for more than a quarter century. (Photo courtesy of Gilman Wong)

Together with Lau Bun, TY Wong would oversee the martial arts culture in San Francisco’s Chinatown for more than a quarter century. (Photo courtesy of Gilman Wong)

 
I leave Gilman Wong’s home with some photographs and several pages of notes. It’s all excellent material that has exceeded my expectations, from the Arlene Francis photos to the image of the 1940s street scene, to the subtle nuances of this history that Gilman has conveyed to me. In this regard, the beat has rendered some great results.

If I am in fact getting better at “hanging out,” it is due to some of these approaches that I have learned over time. And in case I lost you on all the graveyard talk (or, you just got caught up staring at TY’s butterfly swords), here is a recap. First and foremost, when it comes to sources, make a wish-list of who you would ideally like to speak with and then pursue each of them individually until they tell you – “no.” (And then politely pursue them a bit more.) The more primary sources the better. Next, look to speak with the fringe players as much as the principal characters, they will give your work unique details and nuance. Do your homework on what is already out there, and ask questions that advance the topic forward. If you need to cover well-tread material, find a new angle at approaching it. Finally, remember that even the most mundane topics can render fascinating details if you invest the time and look hard enough.

As the graveyards stream by on my right, I feel like TY Wong’s legacy is slowly ascending from obscurity. TY is buried out here. So is Lau Bun. I drive out of Colma fascinated with the people and places this history has presented to me. When it comes to the fine art of hanging out, this is easily one of the best beats I’ve had the good fortune to cover.

 

 

oOo

 

About the Author: Charles Russo is a journalist in San Francisco. He is the author of Striking Distance: Bruce Lee and the Dawn of Martial Arts in America (available July 1st from the University of Nebraska Press). For more photographs and materials related to the book, see the Striking Distance Instagram account (@striking_distance) or the Facebook page.

oOo


Who “Owns” Kung Fu? Intangible Cultural Heritage, Globalization and the Decentering of the Asian Martial Arts

$
0
0
The Pagoda Temple at the Shaolin Temple in Henan Province.  Source: cnn.com

The Pagoda Forest at the Shaolin Temple in Henan Province. Source: cnn.com

 

 

“Inoue said the Japanese style of judo traditionally focused more on quantity rather than quality, trying to instill a tough mentality. But in Europe, which Inoue describes as “the mainstream of judo today,” judoka train more efficiently.

“A balance between efficiency and inefficiency and a balance between scientific things and unscientific things — you have to look at those, otherwise there’s no progress for our game,” Inoue said. “We’ve switched our mind-set that way.”

“Inoue Determined to Help Japan Keep Pace.” Japan Times, 5/2/2016.

 

 

Introduction

 
Who owns a martial art?

On the surface this question would seem to have an obvious answer.  Most of these systems come with a specific name (kendo or taijiquan), and they fall into generally accepted categories, such as Japanese Budo or the Chinese martial arts. The very act of describing these systems in the English language seems to underline an obvious fact.  The martial arts are best understood as the technical and cultural property of the previously mentioned nations.  It is all a matter of common sense.

Unfortunately “common sense” has a nasty habit of transforming itself into complex assumptions that no one ever questions.  For students of nationalism, a fairly modern political ideology spread and popularized in the 19th and 20th centuries, an assertion like the one above might begin to raise eyebrows.

While Chinese citizens during the Qing dynasty were certainly aware of the existence of the state and their responsibilities to it, most contemporary accounts indicate they did not think of themselves as members of a unified, polyglot, “Chinese nation” during the late imperial period.  Instead they were much more likely to organize their identity around lineage groups, regional locations and patronage networks.  Strong feelings of national identification didn’t really grip the populace until the founding of the Republic in the post-1911 period.  And yet many of the traditional martial arts (including systems like taijiquan and wing chun) were already well established through local and regional networks prior to the rise of the “the nation.”

The case of “Japanese” Karate makes an even better case study of the complex relationship between the emergence of hand combat systems and national identities.  As many of us already know, this art first came to Japan from Okinawa.  There it went through a process of fundamental transformation, rationalization, and even renaming, before it was determined that it could be a vehicle for the new strain of Japanese nationalism that was then insinuating itself into the martial arts.

So does that mean that Karate is originally an Okinawan martial art?  Possibly.  Yet again the story is more complicated than our nationally focused narratives might suggest.  Hand combat was particularly popular in a couple of areas of Okinawa, and it is not clear to historians that all of these practitioners shared a common style.  And various arts from Southern China (including White Crane Boxing) likely played a critical role in popularizing these modes of hand combat in Okinawa.

So does that mean that Karate is really a Chinese art?  Probably not.  When we push historical arguments to their logical conclusion we find that knowledge about a practice’s “genetic origin” are often unhelpful in understanding how a community actually understands itself and functions today.

While a regionally focused approach to understanding the development of the Asian martial arts shows a lot of potential, the ancient origins of individual techniques have little bearing on their current identity.  This point seems obvious enough.

When a modern American undergoes genetic testing and learns that a certain percentage of his DNA originated in Poland, he may be able to claim previously unknown Eastern European ancestry.  Yet he can’t really claim to now possess a “Polish identity.”

That is a matter of deep cultural knowledge and life experience.  If you are depending on a blind genetic test to discover some aspect of your genetic heritage, we can safely assume that it plays little role in your actual cultural identity.  Nor would most people make the mistake of conflating these two categories when talking about genealogy.

So why do we tend to conflate similar categories when discussing the martial arts?  Why do we routinely assume that some quirk of our wing chun practice shows its deep “Chinese heritage,” particularly when hung gar and taijiquan people do things very differently in similar situations?

 

A hand colored magic lantern slide, produced in Japan, showing both Judo and Kendo.  Source: Author's Personal Collection.

A hand colored magic lantern slide, produced in Japan, showing both Judo and Kendo. Source: Author’s Personal Collection.

 

Nationalism, Globalization and the Martial Arts

 

I blame nationalism and, more recently, globalization.  Let’s start with nationalism.

When a country sought to enter the nation state system during the 19th and 20th century their acceptance was not assured.  One joins this club by being accepted by the other members.  As certain students of nationalism have observed, potential nations had to clear a couple of barriers to justify their claims.  First they had to prove that they possessed a unique culture (often in the form of a print language and folklore), a homeland, and a population.  In short one had to demonstrate that your national identity was unique, and not simply a variation of some larger identity.

Yet in joining the international system Benedict Anderson keenly observed that one accepted that your “unique nation” was now on equal footing with every other nation.  To be a member of a nation is to realize that every stranger that you encounter is also a member of an equally august body.  So while on one level all nations are unique, on a more fundamental level they are also interchangeable.  And this realization cleared the way for a certain sort of competition between them.

One of the reasons that I am interested in the Asian martial arts is that they grew up in conjunction with this new category of “nation states.”  While we tend to assume that both of these things are impossibly ancient, emerging from the mists of time, in truth they are fairly recent.  Still, the roots of these combat systems in the late imperial period were well enough established that reformers could offer them up as proof of an “ancient and continuous” body of unique cultural traditions which supported the claims of legitimacy of the newly established national identity.

Why then do we believe that Karate reveals something essential about the “Japanese character”?  Or that Taijiquan is the key to understanding the Chinese “national experience”?  Because people have been repeating these assertions since about 1920.

Nor do I expect that these patterns of belief will change any time soon.  We now have a sound understanding of the actual historical development of these combat systems, and this is a good thing for those wishing to develop an academic discussion of the martial arts.  Yet the accelerating process of globalization has only served to reinforce the fundamental dilemma that popularized these myths in the first place.

 

A celebration of the 2011 "world tai chi day."  Source:www.chineseartsalliance.com.

A celebration of the 2011 “world tai chi day.” Source:www.chineseartsalliance.com.

 

Global Decentering of the Asian Martial Arts

 

Global markets demand a degree of conformity between states that was previously unimaginable.  Nevertheless, national identity is not fading from the stage of history.  The incentive to argue for one’s uniqueness in the face of corrosive global pressures is accelerating rather than vanishing.  The research of martial arts studies scholars notwithstanding, I suspect that many practitioners will continue to seek “the essence” of ethno-nationalist identity in practices far divorced from the communities that actually created them.

Ironically, this quasi-fundamentalist turn in the development of the martial arts may arise from the very trends that seem to be pushing the development of the martial arts in a more open direction.  The creation of free markets, relatively inexpensive travel and virtually free communication via the internet has created a situation in which all sorts of once local identities now have an ability to migrate to new locations, effectively establishing transnational communities.  In many ways the traditional Asian martial arts are ideally situated to take advantage of these openings.

The types of institutional organization established during the early 20th century were designed to facilitate the creation of branch schools and “franchises” as a way of spreading an economically lucrative and politically advantageous movement.  Further, having students outside of one’s own ethno-linguistic group reinforces the perception of value, and hence legitimacy, of this body of practice.  Cultivating certain sorts of over-seas teaching opportunities generates not only income but social prestige.  Lastly, cultural factors in the West following WWII, the Korean War, the Vietnam War and the counter-culture explosion of the 1960s and 1970s ensured that these practices would find a receptive audience.

The end result has been an almost unparalleled growth in the global martial arts movement.  This change has been so rapid that many arts have become “decentered.”  If one were to plot the median geographic location of their practitioners on a map it would be clear that their social center of gravity has moved out of their country of origin.

The quote at the start of this article is taken from a recent newspaper profile of the new coach of the Japanese men’s judo team.  In it he is forced to confront the fact that Japan’s standing at the highest levels of international competition has been challenged in recent years.  They simply are not winning as many gold medals as the folks back home demand.

The reasons why are clear.  It is not that the quality of the Japanese Judo community has degraded.  Rather, as he plainly states, the center of Judo practice is now found in Europe.

In a sense this should not be a surprise.  As any of its citizens will be quick to remind us, Japan is a “small island nation.”  Its total population is limited.  This also constrains the number of youth that are available to go into serious Judo training at any point in time.

Further, its approach to training has often prioritized cultural factors over scientifically rational innovation.  Given the huge number of practitioners now found in the rest of the world, the end result seems obvious.  The era of Japan monopolizing the medal podium in this sport is probably over.  Yet the close connection between Japanese nationalism and their years of success in judo (the only Japanese sport to be accepted as an Olympic event) suggests that this realization is likely to be somewhat painful.

Nor is this decentering limited to the case of judo.  Alexander Bennett concludes his recent history of kendo (California UP, 2015) with an argument that the spread of Japanese Budo practices abroad will always be limited by the intimate connections of these practices with identity and nationalism in the eyes of many of their Japanese supporters.  While they may be forced to acknowledge their losses in global sporting events, it is simply too easy to say that on a fundamental level, the “foreigners” will never understand the “true essence” of the art, while leaving all of the relevant terms undefined.  In Bennett’s view this corrosive discourse (something that he has had the chance to observe first hand) may end up limiting the ultimate growth of sports like kendo.

This general pattern is not limited to the Japanese arts.  Despite the old trope of Chinese masters who refuses to teach “outsiders,” huge numbers of students have taken up various aspects of the TCMA since the 1970s.  Most of the traditional Chinese systems have been very supportive of the growing size and sophistication of their foreign student bases.  After all, they have the potential to increase both the prestige and revenue flowing to a given style.

Still, it is not uncommon to hear worried discussions that at some point Shanghai, Henan, or Hong Kong will no longer be the center of a given practice.  What will happen to the Chinese martial arts when, in an ethnic sense, they cease to be “Chinese?”  One of the very first reviews I did for this blog actually looked at a (nicely produced) Wing Chun documentary in which this exact possibility was debated by some masters in Hong Kong.

The case of Wing Chun is actually particularly interesting as this is not simply a “Chinese” art.  It is even more strongly associated with the region surrounding the Pearl River Delta in Guangdong and (since 1950) Hong Kong.  Both shifts in the global economy and a changing relationship with mainland China have sensitized individuals to the value of these local identities.  As such, the growing overseas popularity of Wing Chun has reinforced the area’s claim to possessing an independent and distinct cultural heritage while, at the same time, threatening to decenter one of its most important elements of cultural heritage.

But we should be clear about the facts on the ground.  It is not the case that at some point in the distant future the geographic center of Wing Chun might shift out of southern China.  That probably happened during the 1990s.

Once again, I think that we can thank Europe.  It is not a case of Hong Kong’s martial excellence declining.  Rather Europe has a huge (relatively unified) market for martial arts training, and Wing Chun has now been established abroad for enough years to develop some real expertise.

This general pattern of cultural drift is in no way unique to the martial arts.  It is a mathematical fact given the way that globalization works.  Any product which gains a degree of popularity will quickly discover that the size of the potential export market (the entire world) is by definition larger than the size of the domestic market (a single country).  This basic fact is why the domestic price of a good always goes up when you open the market to exports.  It also helps to explain why America’s most talented jazz musicians spend their summers in Europe and much of our best single malt whiskey ends up in Asia.

We return then to the essential paradox that has been driving this discussion.  On the one hand national identity has not vanished in the current era.  In fact, the challenges of globalization have made some elements of the national discourse more popular than ever.  Yet the nature of global markets dictate that the transnational demand for many of these most popular symbols and practices will always be greater than the domestic audience in any single city, region or state.  To paraphrase Adam Frank, we live in an era when identity moves, whether you want it to or not.

 

Hong Kong Airline flight crews practice Wing Chun.  Source: South China Morning Post.

Hong Kong Airline flight crews practice Wing Chun. Source: South China Morning Post.

 


Conclusion: The Rise of Intangible Cultural Heritage

 

This brings us to the final point.  The acceleration of globalization after the 1990s has coincided with the rise of what scholars have called the “cultural heritage” discourse.  Here we see more state and local governments seeking to identify, label and curate either places or practices seen as worthy of protection by the international community.

I recently had an opportunity to watch a lecture delivered at Cornell University by Prof. Yujie Zhu on the various ways in which the cultural heritage discourse has affected communities in China.  It has been posted online and anyone interested in these topics would be well advised to take a moment and check it out.

One of the points to merged from this discussion was that the movement toward designating practices as examples of “intangible cultural heritage” (as opposed to simply concentrating on historic locations) was driven in large part by lobbying on the part of China, Japan and Korea.  They noted that in many cases it was the Confucian value of “faithful transmission” of past beliefs and practices that constituted examples of “heritage” within their cultural framework.

Further, with the massive disruption of China’s urban geography during this period of rapid growth, one suspects that the people were forced to turn to practices, beliefs and identities in an effort to both establish a relationship with the past as well as to build new social networks in the present.

It is interesting to consider the global movement of the Asian martial arts in light of the rise of ICH discussions.  As I have reported in numerous news updates, there has been a lot of pressure to include various martial arts styles, and even specific lineages, on ICH lists drawn up by national or local governments in China.  This has certainly been the case in Hong Kong which, in the last few years, seems to have awaken to the heritage of potential of such quintessentially southern arts as Hung Gar and Wing Chun.

Yet Hong Kong’s government has generally taken a “market led” approach to preserving the past.  They have ignored repeated calls (often coming from individuals within the martial arts community) to provide actual funding or material support to preserve these practices, and have instead claimed that their intention is to establish a list so that private citizens, firms and donors will have a better sense of where they wished to invest their scarce time and money.

On the mainland the support for ICH practices has been somewhat more robust, especially in those cases where a local practice can be tied to heritage tourism (the martial arts at Shaolin or Mt. Wudang are classic examples of this).  Yet given that this same situation is unlikely to play out in Hong Kong (where martial arts tourism is not a large part of the city’s economy) what else could be gained from winning ICH status?

In thinking over Prof. Zhu’s fine talk I began to wonder whether ICH status was not in some way seen as a counterweight to the decentering effects of globalization.  Yes, the basic laws of mathematics dictate that most of the individuals who practice and teach Wing Chun must live outside of the city of Hong Kong.  Yet the establishment of an ICH discourse around the art affirms that it is not simply a self-defense system, or even a pure martial arts tradition.  Rather it is a matter of cultural, regional and ethnic heritage.

Whether this is true, and if such a declaration would have convinced a skeptical middle class in the year 1950 (when the martial arts tended to be much less popular in Hong Kong), is an interesting question.  But this is not today’s question.  Rather, once we have established that a given martial art is linked to traditional cultural values (as defined by the appropriate government committee), after sufficient repetition, it becomes a social fact.

This has the effect of creating a zone within the Wing Chun community that cannot be decentered.  No matter what level of technical excellence is achieved in a school in Germany or San Francisco, one must always return to, and look towards, the art’s “traditional home” to discover its essence.  And to the extent that Hong Kong and Foshan may find themselves competing for the scarce dollars of Wing Chun tourists, an ICH designation cannot hurt!

In some senses this is a very positive development.  Wing Chun has become a critical part of Hong Kong’s identity and that should be emphasized and defended.  And I think that any martial art community will be made stronger through the establishment of a rich web of exchange and travel.  Finally, the historian in me loves the idea of “preservation.”

Yet as a social scientist I know that these topics must be approached critically.  The establishment of an ICH discourse does not just “preserve,” it also changes, sometimes in fundamental ways.

Its aim is to take that which was “threatened” and create “stability.”  Items of low social status are transformed to become centers of  cultural complex programs.  Practices that were economically marginal are redefined as upstanding middle class behaviors.  And in the martial arts it might take what was once a simple hand combat system and transforms it into a bastion of values and identity.

This is all particularly interesting as there are ongoing debates within most martial arts systems as to what their goals should be.  What values should they advance?  Are they effective self-defense mechanisms, or ways of learning about traditional culture?  It is hard to imagine that the establishment of an ICH system would not somehow shuffle this deck and deal out a new round of winning and losing hands.

In conclusion, the complicated discussions that surround identity in the martial arts are, on some level, an inheritance from their brush with nationalism.  The acceleration of these same trends in the current era of globalization has led to the geographic and cultural decentering of many arts.  This is a trend that will likely continue in the future.

Within this context we might be able to understand the sudden interest in ICH labels (even in places where there is no immediate payoff in terms of tourism) as a way of resisting these pressures and reclaiming cultural ownership over a set of practices.  Yet the inherently political nature of this process guarantees that ICH designations will change certain aspects of a given martial arts community while attempting to preserve others.

This complicated balance between local and national identities (seeking to reinforce their own legitimacy) and the transnational communities of students who actually practice and financially support these arts, suggest that it is not really possible to know who “owns” kung fu.  But this debate has been underway (in one form or another) for some time, and it has done much to shape the arts that we currently know.  As such it is a question worth asking.

 

 

oOo

If you enjoyed this essay you might also want to read: Producing “Healthy Citizens”: Social Capital, Rancière and Ladies-Only Kickboxing

oOo


Chinese Martial Arts in the News: May 17th, 2016: Kung Fu Art, Brawling and New Books!

$
0
0
25-year-old master Zhong Siyuan practices martial art at the Yuhuang Temple in Luzhou city, southwest China's Sichuan province. Source: china.com.cn

25-year-old master Zhong Siyuan practices martial art at the Yuhuang Temple in Luzhou city, southwest China’s Sichuan province. Source: china.com.cn

Introduction

Welcome to “Chinese Martial Arts in the News.”  This is a semi-regular feature here at Kung Fu Tea in which we review media stories that mention or affect the traditional fighting arts.  In addition to discussing important events, this column also considers how the Asian hand combat systems are portrayed in the mainstream media.

While we try to summarize the major stories over the last month, there is always a chance that we have missed something.  If you are aware of an important news event relating to the TCMA, drop a link in the comments section below.  If you know of a developing story that should be covered in the future feel free to send me an email.

Its been a while since our last update so there is a lot to be covered in today’s post.  Let’s get to the news!

A fight between the Armenian and Azerbaijani camps at a recent Kung Fu tournament in the Ukraine. Source: https://www.rt.com

A fight between the Armenian and Azerbaijani camps at a recent Kung Fu tournament in the Ukraine. Source: https://www.rt.com

News from All Over

You can file our first story under “Well…that happened.”  A set of European Kung Fu Championships were recently held in the Ukraine.  But the only news stories about the event that are currently circulating focus on an epic, bench clearing brawl that erupted during the Armenian/Azerbaijni match.  Follow the link for footage of the event. After reviewing the tape and various news stories I think that there are a couple of lessons that we can take away from this.

First, we can think of this as an example of “Kung Fu Diplomacy” gone very badly.  The relationship between these two countries has been difficult for years.  And sometimes mutual participation in sporting institutions can be an important step in normalizing relations and spreading a zone of peaceful norms.  That is the basic idea behind the Olympics.  But in other cases events like this can lead to a serious rethink of the wisdom of using folding chairs for seating at a fight.  Sure they are convenient for the venue, but they are uncomfortable both when sitting on them and when getting smacked upside the the head with one.  Maybe next year we will go with theater style seating instead?

Is this the future of the martial arts in China?

Is this the future of the UFC in China?

Continuing with the theme of seemingly unlikely stories, multiple news outlets over the last few weeks have reported that the the UFC is currently in “advanced stage” talks to sell its fight promotion business.  Two of the bidders at the table are actually Chinese firms (Dalian Wanda and a private equity and venture capital firm named China Media Capital).   Current speculation is that this deal, if it goes through, could be be worth $3.5-4 billion USD.  One also can’t help but wonder whether a sale to a Chinese media company might solve the franchises perennial difficulties in cracking the Chinese TV market.

If our first story seemed to illustrate the dangers of Kung Fu Diplomacy, this one shows the strengths of the strategies.  A number of news stories from across Africa have come out in the recent weeks profiling local students who have won opportunities to pursue further studies in China through contests hosted by local embassies and Confucius Institutes.  In general these events seem to have focused on language training, but as I read multiple accounts I was struck by the fact that the Chinese martial arts just kept coming up as a key aspect of Chinese culture that was popular with students and actively drawing them into closer engagement with these broader public diplomacy strategies.  Maybe the best case of this to merge in the recent crop of news stories is this account of Luis Matthew who left the judges in awe with his Chinese Kung Fu performance at a Chinese language proficiency competition held recently in Namibia.  His story is well worth reading as it seems to be representative of a much larger trend that is currently underway.  Click here for the link.  It is also worth noting that this specific account seems to have been singled out for heavy distribution by the Chinese press.  [Sadly I was not able to find a picture from the winning performance.]

Kung Fu Connect

It looks like a new version of the Kung Fu game for Kinect is about to drop.  Check out the previous link for the announcement, a game-play trailer and a review.

In a variety of previous posts we have discussed the importance of media in attracting people, and forming their initial beliefs about, the martial arts.  A lot of this discussion has focused on Kung Fu movies as film studies scholars are a driving force behind the discussion.  But in the current era video games are an increasingly important agent in spreading ideas about the martial arts.

In that respect this game is very interesting as it fully harnesses the fantasy of entering a comic book world where it is physically possible to fight the bad guys without ever having to go to an actual school and put in the time necessary to learn from a teacher.  Its the closest thing to a martial arts game on the holo-deck of the USS Enterprise that we have yet seen.  Needless to say its hard not to think of Umberto Eco’s essay “Travels in Hyper-Reality” when watching these trailers.  In fact, I suspect that a cultural studies student could put together a pretty decent paper just on the representations of the martial arts in this set of links alone.

25-year-old master Zhong Siyuan practices martial art at the Yuhuang Temple in Luzhou city, southwest China's Sichuan province. Source: china.com.cn

25-year-old master Zhong Siyuan practices martial art at the Yuhuang Temple in Luzhou city, southwest China’s Sichuan province. Source: china.com.cn

Of course it would be foolish to ignore the strength of the “authenticity discourse” that pervades the Chinese martial arts.  The next story taps into these currents.  Multiple Chinese news sites have reported the story of Zhong Siyuan, a 25 year old college student who turned down a potentially lucrative career to instead take up the life of a Daoist nun at the Yuhuang Temple in Luzhou (Sichuan province.)  The photo essay shows her cultivating traditional arts such as music and calligraphy, but also dedicating herself to martial arts training in stereotypical mountaintop location.  Stories like this can easily be read as reinforcing the self-orientalizing discourse that often pervades discussions of the traditional martial arts in China.  Yet at the same time they help to position the martial arts as a “cultural luxury good” that the upwardly mobile both can (and should) aspire to.  See this guest post for a little more on this phenomenon.

Zhong Chen at Singapore's REDSEA Gallery. Source: http://sea.blouinartinfo.com

Zhong Chen at Singapore’s REDSEA Gallery. Source: http://sea.blouinartinfo.com (I can’t help but notice that the Gentleman on the right bears more than passing resemblance to Batman).

Regular readers will know I am always on the lookout for good Kung Fu related art.  Its a little surprising to me that the TCMA don’t generate more visual art.  As such the following story grabbed my attention, especially as it also plays into the “authenticity discourse” and makes a strong argument about what happens to the Chinese martial arts when they are practiced and appropriated by “Westerners.”

“The Kung-Fu Series by Zhong Chen” explores how Chinese cultural touchstones, like the iconic martial art, are diluted in the process of exportation and representation in Western mass media. The artist’s own experiences living in Australia inform his perspective on the phenomenon of “Western” or Anglo-Australian ideas mixing freely with “Eastern” or Chinese ideas.

Kung Fu visualization by the German artist Tobias Gremmler. Source: https://thestack.com

Kung Fu visualization by the German artist Tobias Gremmler. Source: https://thestack.com

Over the last few weeks there have also been news stories about another, aesthetically very different, TCMA related art project.  These images were rendered by the German artist Tobias Gremmler using motion capture technology to show patterns of movements within Chinese martial arts forms.  I noted with some interest that the project was backed by the always productive International Guoshu Association.

chengmanching_sword

Taijiquan students, and those interested in philosophy of the Chinese martial arts and their history in North America, will want to take a look at The Professor: Tai Chi’s Journey to the West, a recent documentary by Barry Strugatz.  The LA Times wrote a short review of the film, and I reviewed it here at Kung Fu Tea as well looking at some of the issues most relevant to students of martial arts studies.  The Film Journal also did a piece on the documentary which was less complimentary but also worth taking a look at.

A still from the five deadly venoms.

A still from the five deadly venoms.

For those looking for a little more action in their martial arts films, we have a list of the “20 Best Martial Arts Films” courtesy of the the Movie Pilot.  For reasons that I do not completely understand, lists seem to be one of the dominant genera for generating content on the internet.  But this list is actually pretty good, and I noticed that some classic Japanese samurai films got included in the group!  Pretty much everything here is mandatory viewing (and I was even happy to see that Iron Monkey made the cut).

TGOS.5-7-2016.after the awards

Finally, we have a lightsaber story.  The Syracuse Martial Arts Academy and The Gathering of Sabers recently hosted the region’s first open lightsaber combat tournament.  Fortunately the local news decided to drop by and do both a story and short video segment on the event.  You can see them here.  It is always interesting to observe the ways in which these events are discussed, and it appears that a good time was had by all!  You can follow the group that hosted this event here.

A history of Chinese Martial Arts Fiction

Martial Arts Studies

As always there are some exciting announcements for students of martial arts studies.  The first thing to catch my eye was the announcement of a new forthcoming book from Cambridge University Press that is sure to become a workhorse volume in pretty much everyone’s library.  Later this year they will be releasing an English language translation of Pingyuan Chen’s classic study A History of Chinese Martial Arts Fiction.

Here is the publisher’s blurb:

Chen Pingyuan is one of the leading scholars of modern Chinese literature, known particularly for his work on wuxia, a popular and influential genre of historical martial arts fiction still celebrated around the world today. This work, presented here in English translation for the first time, is considered to be the seminal work on the evolution, aesthetics and politics of the modern Chinese wuxia novel in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, tracing the resurgence of interest in classical chivalric tales in late Qing China.

Now With Kung Fu Grip! How Bodybuilders, Soldiers and a Hairdresser Reinvented Martial Arts for America. By Jared Miracle. McFarland & Company (March 31, 2016)

Now With Kung Fu Grip! How Bodybuilders, Soldiers and a Hairdresser Reinvented Martial Arts for America. By Jared Miracle. McFarland & Company (March 31, 2016)

I also want to remind readers that Dr. Jared Miracle’s much anticipated modern history of the martial arts, Now with Kung Fu Grip! (McFarland & Company, 2016) is about to start shipping. Miracle has been a frequent guest author here at Kung Fu Tea and he recently contributed an important article to the journal Martial Arts Studies.  Needless to say I have been looking forward to the release of this book for quite some time and recommend it to anyone interested in the history of the martial arts.  Be sure to check out his MAS article for a sample of the sorts of discussions that you will find in this book.

Grayson Perry (centre, back), in Episode One of All Man, Channel 4

Grayson Perry (centre, back), in Episode One of All Man, Channel 4

If you are looking for some immediate satisfaction with no shipping delay, consider checking out this blog post by Paul Bowman dealing with questions of masculinity and gender in the martial arts (specifically in the UK) today.  It is a fascinating read.

An assortment of Chinese teas. Source: Wikimedia.

An assortment of Chinese teas. Source: Wikimedia.

 

 

Kung Fu Tea on Facebook

A lot has happened on the Kung Fu Tea Facebook group over the last few weeks.  We discussed some really old spear work, examined the latest translations of Taijiquan manuals released by the Brennan Translation blog, and discovered a group recreating medieval combat sports in New York City. Joining the Facebook group is also a great way of keeping up with everything that is happening here at Kung Fu Tea.

If its been a while since your last visit, head on over and see what you have been missing.

 

 


Striking Distance: Charles Russo Recounts the Rise of the Chinese Martial Arts in America

$
0
0

striking distance.russo

 

Charles Russo. 2016. Striking Distance: Bruce Lee & the Dawn of Martial Arts in America. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 264 pages. $24.95 USD (Hardcover)

 

Anyone can tell you that it is easier to review a good book than a bad one.  This simple truth makes Charles Russo’s latest volume a pleasure to discuss.  Striking Distance: Bruce Lee & the Dawn of Martial Arts in America (Nebraska UP, 2016) is one of those rare martial arts volumes that is likely to be widely read by individuals practicing a variety of styles.  It will also be of interest to those who are looking for a better vantage point from which to observe the history of the San Francisco Chinese community at a time of immense social change but have no background in the fighting arts.

Still, it is among martial artists that this book will have its greatest impact.  I fully expect that it will be discussed for years to come.  It may even play a similar role to R. W. Smith’s classic Chinese Boxing: Master and Methods (Kodansha, 1974) for a new generation of martial artists seeking to better understand their roots.

The comparison with Smith is an interesting one.  The first thing that readers will notice is the quality of Russo’s writing.  Simply put, this is a wonderfully written book.  Its style is at turns lyrical yet succinct.  Russo’s descriptions of individual events are rich and evoke a sense of texture and place that I have not encountered in very many descriptions of martial arts history.

His ability to reproduce a sense of intimacy, from smoked filled halls to creaky staircases, give his narrative a gripping quality.  This is amplified by the use of short chapters, each of which flows easily into the next.  The end result is a genuinely compelling story.

Smith was also an engaging writer.  While an intelligence officer by trade his writing reflected the journalism of his day.  His brief yet incisive descriptions of the martial artists that he encountered drew in many readers and earned him a great many fans.  I suspect that Russo’s text will be received in much the same way.

Nevertheless, it is the contrasts that I find most interesting.  Smith was a deeply devoted martial artists.  Like many young men of his generation he had come up through the ranks of boxing and judo before moving on to the newer and more exotic fighting systems (karate, taijiquan, kali and the various schools of kung fu) that would erupt into the public consciousness during the 1970s.

R. W. Smith was an early adopter of the Chinese fighting arts and he eagerly sought to promote these in the West. He hoped to not just to document what he saw, but to shape public opinion about these subjects through his writing. While this gave his prose a bite that many readers found enjoyable, it also led him to make some assertions that now require reevaluation.

In comparison Russo has little skin in the game.  He does not identify as a martial artist and has none of the personal or stylistic loyalties that dominate the work of his literary predecessor.  Russo is a professional Bay Area journalist and writer with a keen interest in local history and a nose for a good story.  The San Francisco martial arts scene, from the 1940s through the 1960s, provided ample material to satisfy both of these instincts.

It is even possible that Russo’s status as a non-practitioner was an advantage while researching this volume.  As quickly becomes apparent, this work is not based so much on the sorts of historical research that one does in a library (though there is some of that) but on literally hundreds of interviews and casual conversations with individuals who were direct observers of the events in question.  A certain “neutrality” on the question of local loyalties was probably beneficial in winning the trust of his various sources.

And like any good journalist Russo has spent a good deal of time cross-checking these verbal accounts and comparing them to previously published sources.  When particularly complex issues arise serious thought is given to the credibility of the different perspectives that exist within the community.

 

Lau Bun demonstrates the use of the Tiger Fork in the late 1960s.  Source: http://plumblossom.net/ChoyLiFut/laubun.html

Lau Bun demonstrates the use of the Tiger Fork in the late 1960s. Source: http://plumblossom.net/ChoyLiFut/laubun.html

 

The end result is a nuanced view of individuals like Lau Bun, Wally Jay, Ed Parker and Bruce Lee that steadfastly resists the temptation to romanticize them.    Russo seems to understand that it is the “warts” that humanize us, which make empathy possible in a “warts and all” history.  In this way he avoids the rhetorical extremes of his predecessor.

Yet this is more than the story of a handful of people.  It is also the story of a place.  San Francisco’s Chinatown stands out as a key actor in these events, exerting a type of influence on the unfolding story.  Russo’s history provides critical insights into not just the martial arts, but the neighborhood that supported them.

In my own study of Wing Chun in Foshan and Hong Kong I called for a greater emphasis on local and regional history within martial arts studies.   When we focus on only systemic and national level trends we create a distorted image of how the martial arts were actually experienced by most of their practitioners.  Why did individuals turn to them?  How were they able to express their own desires for the future through these practices?

Russo’s work stand as a powerful testament to the value of a local, layered, perspective in answering these key questions.  One can only hope that this volume inspires future studies tackling different cities, time periods and communities.

Readers interested in Bruce Lee’s life and development as a martial artist will find much value in this volume.  As one of San Francisco’s most famous sons (and martial artists) Lee’s exploits bookend Russo’s narrative.  His narrative begins with Lee’s appearance at one of Wally Jay’s locally famous luals and it ends with his now (in)famous showdown with Wong Jack Man at his Oakland school.  In between we are introduced to the key figures and personalities that shaped the bay area Chinese martial arts scene through the middle of the 1960s.

 

Together with Lau Bun, TY Wong would oversee the martial arts culture in San Francisco's Chinatown for more than a quarter century. (Photo courtesy of Gilman Wong)

Together with Lau Bun, TY Wong would oversee the martial arts culture in San Francisco’s Chinatown for more than a quarter century. (Photo courtesy of Gilman Wong)

 

Special attention is paid to Lau Bun (the description of his school is really wonderful), T. Y. Wong (another Chinatown institution) and the Gee Yau Seah club (“Soft Arts Academy”) as the three forces that shaped the area’s small but stable martial arts scene from the start of WWII through the middle of the 1960s.  After that a series of complex social changes in the neighborhood unleashed a reorganization of the area’s hand combat community.

Russo’s project is to excavate the region’s martial arts as they existed prior to the burst of growth and creativity that gripped the area in the late 1960s and 1970s.  This older stratum of social history has always been harder to pin down, and as such he has done valuable work in reconstructing both how the area’s martial arts culture initially evolved, and why a modernist counter-movement eventually began to coalesce in Oakland (a group with which Bruce Lee found a natural home).  Yet it is the accounts of pioneers such as Lau Bun and T. Y. Wong (as well as Ed Parker and Wally Jay) that more historically minded readers will be drawn to.

If I have one serious complaint about this book it would have to be the length.  At about 150 pages of actual text I found it to be too short by half.  Given the engaging nature of Russo’s prose I suspect that most readers will be left wanting more.  Yet that desire is also telling.

When evaluating a work such as this we must ask ourselves whether it is capable of not only answering questions but also inspiring new ones.  I suspect that the answer is yes.

Russo has approached this work as a journalist, and not as an academic student of martial arts studies.  As such he is more concerned with reporting his narrative than asking questions about the causality or social meaning of the events that he relates.  Yet many of his stories might be the jumping off point for further discussions.

One issue that arises repeatedly throughout his text is the supposed teaching ban on non-Chinese students within the traditional Chinese martial arts.  I say “supposed” as while many individuals assert that such a ban was in place, it is not actually clear how many non-Chinese students were petitioning for instruction in San Francisco during the 1940s or 1950s.  Prior to the 1940s there does not appear to have been much in the way of public schools for anyone to study at.  And by the time that Russo’s narrative really gets going there is a small but steady stream of non-Chinese students that appear throughout the period in seeming defiance of such a ban.

So what was the nature and purpose of this ban, and why did it collapse so quickly after the first few years of the 1960s?  In what ways was this norm expressed differently within the bay area Chinese community (because of its direct experience of neighborhood level racial hostility) than in the taijiquan community back in China?

With regards to these questions it seems that Russo’s sources provide him with somewhat contradictory accounts, the implications of which are not always clear.  On one level this presents future researchers with a simple empirical problem.  Did Ip Man really kick Bruce Lee out of his school because of his mixed race heritage?  Can this actually be documented by period accounts?

Yet the theoretical implications of this conversation are even more important.  How was it that shared narratives of community exclusion, then inclusion, shaped Chinese American identity in the 20th century, regardless of what any specific teacher actually chose to do in the face of this norm?  How was this different from, or connected to, the parallel process that was unfolding in Hong Kong, or Taiwan?

At times I expect that Russo’s reliance on interviews and eye-witness accounts has probably led him astray.  If we have learned anything from the field of law it is that human memory is a highly fungible thing, especially when decades have been allowed to intervene.  When Ip Man entered Hong Kong late in 1949 his wife back in Foshan was very much alive.  He was not a widower.  Yet that is not how he is always remembered now.  Russo directly tackles the problem of “motivated memory,” both at the individual and community level, when discussing the aftermath of the Wong Jack Man fight at the end of his study.

Still, anthropologists and ethnographers would be quick to remind us that the “remembered events” that did not really happen are just as critical to understanding the nature and texture of a community as those that did.  If we treat this work only as a simple history of Bruce Lee we might be disappointed by contradictory accounts or historical “mistakes”.  Yet there are already other sources that we can turn to for most of that information.  Such a reading is in danger of missing the point of a work like this.

What Russo has presented us with is the history of a place caught at a critical moment of transformation.  It has often been assumed that the earlier character of this neighborhood is forever lost and that its influence on the shape of the American martial arts has been limited.  After all, Lau Bun and T. Y. Wong are hardly household names within the American martial arts community, despite their notable careers.

This short book makes the opposite argument.  It demonstrates that their history is still a living, breathing thing.  It is a force that is being remembered and retold.  It is valued by the community that bears it and elements of it have become part of local identity.

Lastly, the history of the bay area during this critical decade has shaped the subsequent evolution of the martial arts in America in many ways.  Some of them were profound, others are easily overlooked.  This the ultimate message of Russo book.  It reminds us that, if understood correctly, local history has a way of becoming all of our histories.

Bruce Lee's first apearance (of many) on the cover of Black Belt Magazine.  October, 1967.

Bruce Lee’s first appearance (of many) on the cover of Black Belt Magazine. October, 1967.

 

oOo

If you enjoyed this review you might also want to read:  The Wing Chun Jo Fen: Norms and the Creation of a Southern Chinese Martial Arts Community.

oOo


Research Notes: Kung Fu Public Diplomacy and a Visit with General Ma Liang

$
0
0
"Russo/Chinese War Scenes." Chinese soldiers drill with Pudao.  Vintage Newsreel. 1929.

“Russo/Chinese War Scenes.” Chinese soldiers drill with Pudao. Vintage Newsreel. 1929.

 

 

Secrecy vs. Advertising in the Chinese Martial Arts


I recently reviewed Charles Russo’s excellent work, Striking Distance, which discussed the spread of the Chinese martial arts on the West Coast of the United States during the middle of the 20th century.  It is a great contribution to the ongoing discussion of the history of these fighting systems, and anyone who is unfamiliar with it will want to check it out.

In this post I would like to offer a slightly different perspective on a theme that arose repeatedly throughout Russo’s study.  How should we think of the supposed secrecy that surrounded the Chinese martial arts in the West prior to the late 1960s?  This is a topic that Russo treats with a fair amount of nuance.

To begin with, some pretty prominent teachers actually taught western students prior to the “lifting of the ban”, and even those who did not personally do so (such as Lau Bun) had senior students of their own that were more than willing to take up the torch.  Nor is it really clear how many western students were petitioning these masters for Kung Fu instruction during the 1950s.  It must be remembered that the Chinese martial arts were a pretty esoteric subject at that point, and not even as popular within their own community as they would become in later decades.  It may have been very easy to enforce a “teaching ban” in an era when practically no one was asking to be taught.

Even worse, an over-emphasis on the supposed secrecy of the Chinese martial arts has had some perverse effects on how we discuss them.  As Paul Bowman (among others) has noted, when we emphasize the “ban” on outsiders the end result is to throw the charge of racism back on the Chinese-American community when in fact they were the ones who were subjected to vast amounts of actual (not imagined) discrimination.

Still, Russo reminds us that we cannot simply dismiss these norms out of hand.  While some Chinese teachers were willing to violate them, they also report being the victims of various sorts of pressures, ranging from economic to actual threats of violence.  After numerous interviews he concluded that there was no reason to doubt the accounts of actual teachers reporting these attitudes within their own community.  Still, by the early 1970s the flood gates were open.  So possible range of years in which a ban could have seriously restricted the economic freedom of large numbers of potential students and teachers is actually pretty limited.

All of this is very interesting, but it is well worth remembering that the Tong associations of either San Francisco or New York did not monopolize access to, or the public discussion of, these fighting systems.  In the grand scheme of the globalization of the Chinese martial arts they were rather minor players who had more influence over members of their own community than the various masters who started to emigrate directly from China to the west throughout the 20th century (Zheng Manqing being a prime example). While they may have preferred that traditional hand combat methods not be taught, or even discussed, with outsiders, other groups had very different plans.

By the second and third decades of the 20th century various thinkers in China realized that the martial arts could be employed as important tools of state building and nationalism. Many of these efforts drew inspiration from the Japanese use of Budo culture in these same roles decades earlier.  And once the TCMA began to be reimagined as tools of the state, they immediately became part of China’s growing “public diplomacy” efforts.

In an earlier time public diplomacy was often referred to as “propaganda.” This typically refers to coordinated media programs designed to influence the thoughts and feelings of the citizens of other countries so that they are more favorably disposed to one’s goals or preferred policy outcomes.  Such efforts can take a variety of forms, and they can be led either directly by state actors or individuals in the private sector.

During the Second World War the term propaganda was seriously discredited and left with only negative connotations.  It fell into disuse, except as a slur.   Political scientists and policy makers today are more likely to speak of “public diplomacy” or “national brand management.”  Still, the basic idea is much the same.

Nor is public diplomacy necessarily a bad thing.  It is hard to think of how it is even possible to address certain pressing problems within the international system, from deterring the spread of radical religious identities to building a consensus to fight climate change, without the skillful use of public diplomacy.  It is one of the very basic implements of diplomacy and statecraft that every country has in their toolbox.

Kendo in Shanghai, pre-1920.  Period reprint of a vintage photograph.  Original photographer unknown.

Kendo in Shanghai, pre-1920. Period reprint of a vintage photograph. Original photographer unknown.

 

As Chinese policy makers observed the West’s fascination with Japanese martial arts such as judo and kendo they quickly realized that their own fighting systems could play an important role in shaping how China was perceived by the global public.  After all, the West was looking to the Budo arts to try and understand how the Japanese “national character” had contributed to their surprising military and economic rise.  Essays on judo and kendo were surprisingly common in the early 20th century, and a fair number of individuals were deciding to try these practices out for themselves.

In contrast, the Western public tended to view the Chinese as politically disorganized, economically backward, socially insular and physically weak.  This was the climate in which the image of China as the “Sick Man of East Asia” began to circulate.

By promoting a streamlined and revitalized system of martial arts training certain policy makers hoped not just to rebuild the domestic body politic, but also to influence how China was perceived on the international stage.  If the new Republic wished to receive any assistance in its struggle against Japanese imperialism and later communism, it was necessary to demonstrate both that the state was unified and that the people possessed the will to resist oppression.  The discussion of China’s proud martial arts heritage, and recent efforts to revive and modernize it, could accomplish both of these tasks at the same time.

In a recent post we looked at newsreels from the 1920s and 1930s in which the Western movie-going public was exposed to these exact messages.  It was also interesting to see how the discussion of the Chinese fighting arts differed from contemporary discussions of Japanese systems.

This post looks at an even earlier example of the use of the Chinese martial arts in Republic era public diplomacy.  During the spring of 1920 Rodney Gilbert wrote an essay titled “China, Parent of Jiu-Jitsu” for the aptly named Bulletin of the Chinese Bureau of Public Information. Later that summer the essay was reprinted in various formats in a number of sources including the North China News in Shanghai (a paper for which Gilbert), the Mid-Pacific Magazine (Volume 20, Number 5), The Literary Digest (May 29th) and the Far East Republic.

Gilbert was a classic example of a unique sort of adventurer that was drawn to China during the Republic period.  He appeared on the other side of the Pacific flat broke with the intention of becoming a pharmaceutical salesman, but he quickly found his calling in journalism.  Gilbert lived in China for decades becoming one of the media’s “old China hands.”  He wrote for a number of papers and eventually ended up having relationships with such prestigious institutions as the Columbia University School of Journalism.

However, a closer look at this writing quickly reveals that Gilbert was very conservative.  He is best remembered for his many attacks on communism.  Gilbert also played a role in American and Chinese public diplomacy efforts, writing pieces that supported the Republic’s government in an attempt to create sympathy among American readers.  During this period he was in frequent contact with political and social leaders, as well as the OSS (the precursor of the CIA).   Nor were communists his only target.  He also wrote a number of pieces supporting the Chinese government against Japanese aggression.

The longest and most complete versions of this article (which I have so far been able to locate) appears to be the one published by the Far East Republic, quoted verbatim from the Bulletin of the Chinese Bureau of Public Information.  I have not been able to find a lot of information on this later publication.  Apparently it only ran for a few years, and its goal was to print English language articles designed to educate and encourage support for the Chinese government among Western readers.  The profile of many of its contributors seems to have been similar to Gilbert’s.  Again, many of them were notably conservative writers with connections to various figures in both the Chinese and western policy establishments.

This particular essay is quite interesting and a few individuals have already commented on versions of it.  Joseph Svinth reprinted a shortened commentary on the piece as published in the Literary Journal (May, 1920) in the Electronic Journal of Martial Arts Studies (EJMAS) in 1999  Acevedo quoted extensively from Svinth’s version in his own blog post titled “Ma Liang – Chinese Martial Arts Modernizer, Warlord and Traitor.

Rehabilitating Ma’s image after his notorious crackdown on student protestors seems to have been one of the specific goals of Gilbert’s commission.  Nor should we overlook the fact that Ma himself had just published his groundbreaking, four volume, “New Martial Arts of China” prior to the release of this article.  Gilbert obliquely notes the release of these books before pointing out that various western military men had examined Ma’s methods and declared that there was nothing here that could not be adopted by Occidental armies wishing to brush up their own training.

All of this should remind us that when we approach this article we are looking at a piece of public diplomacy, emerging from a specific time and place, with a very specific policy agenda.  This is not a work of disinterested journalism or the product of a trained anthropologist.  In fact, one rather strongly suspects that it was General Ma himself who commissioned the Bulletin of the Chinese Bureau of Public Information to promote both his book and military training system while knocking the Japanese down a peg.  Given his important but colorful place in modern martial arts history, this is an important possibility to consider.

Even more critical is to remember that at the same time that the “Old Tong Code of Silence” may have been in full force in certain neighborhoods in the US, vastly larger forces were mobilizing around the idea of promoting the Chinese martial arts on the global stage.  Figures like Ma were well aware of the profound effects of Judo on the Western discussion of Japan, and they sought to promote the Chinese martial arts to boost both their own national image and policy goals abroad.

Perhaps the apex of these efforts would be achieved during the 1936 Olympic Games when Taijiquan was demonstrated to a receptive global audience.  But that should not be understood as a unique event.  Throughout the 1920s and 1930s there was a steady drip of English language articles, books, demonstrations and newsreels all attempting to bring a more favorable vision of the TCMA into Western discussions of Chinese society.  Rather than focusing on a so called “code of silence,” the more interesting question might be to ask why these liberalizing efforts failed to gain greater traction, and how they came to be so totally forgotten.  Yet that is the topic of another post.

When reviewing Gilbert’s discussion of Chinese martial arts readers may want to keep two questions in mind.  First, did he actually witness the event that he reports here?  While it is generally assumed that the answer must be yes, I can’t help but notice that Gilbert never actually claims such in his article.  Rather the entire discussion is phrased in terms of what a theoretical visitor might see if he were able to take in Ma’s (rightly famous) demonstration.  Nor does Gilbert make any claim to expertise in the Chinese martial arts beyond what he has seen on the opera stage.

Secondly, note the rhetorical skill with which Gilbert makes an important two part move.  First, he asserts the uniqueness of the Chinese martial arts and their (historically grounded) superiority to similar Japanese systems.  It is this deep connection to the nation’s history that makes them (and subsequently Ma’s leadership) uniquely well suited for the simple Chinese people, turning “loutish coolies” into modern disciplined soldiers.  Yet at the same time, the deep truths behind these practices are seen to be perfectly compatible with western norms of progress and efficiency.  As a result, it is the western readers and military officers who can immediately identify the actual value in Ma’s program, while a reluctant Chinese nation is only now being convinced to embrace what was best about their past.  It is the Chinese people who are surprised by Ma’s success, but not the western public.

While Gilbert’s readers reside outside this system of bodily practice, the author succeeds in creating a sense of belonging to an “insider” community based on the assumption of shared norms.  In that way readers may be convinced of the value of the martial arts as well as Ma’s heroic leadership.  This dual move also serves to legitimate China’s place in the global community of nations.  It is seen to have a unique cultural heritage which is, nevertheless, of universal value.  It is exactly this claim which would propel the rise of so many Asian martial arts during the second half of the 20th century.

 

 

China, Parent of Jiu-Jitsu

By Rodney Gilbert

The Far East Republic: A Monthly Magazine Devoted to the Republic of China. Vol. 2 No. 11 (August) 1920. Pp 230-232.

 

About 15 year ago the study of the Japanese system of self-defense generally known as jiu-jitsu became popular in Occidental countries.  Japanese Professors of the art were permanently retained; some Europeans and Americans came to the Far East to take postgraduate courses in Japan, and the impression they gave was that jiu-jitsu was very much more than a system of wrestling tricks, and that it involved a profound knowledge of the human anatomy.  The writer does not remember that while jiu-jitsu received all this advertising abroad, it was ever mentioned that it was not native to Japan but, like so much else in Japan, had been originally borrowed from China.  That the system of wrestling which is parent to jiu-jitsu is still cultivated in China, and is now widely taught, only recently became known to the writer, and though many other may be fully aware of this, it is probably not commonly known that the Chinese professors of the art claim that the Japanese system of self-defence is incomplete and that the old Chinese science of self-defence is still superior.

Gen. Ma Liang, Enthusiast

The most ardent living patron of physical training along old Chinese lines is the Commander of the 2nd Division of the Frontier Defence army and of the 47th Mixed Brigade, General Ma Liang, now Occupational Commissioner at Tsinanfu.  Among foreign newspaper readers General Ma Liang is probably best known through his conflict with the student demonstrators in Tsinan last spring when he was given a great deal of adverse advertising and was reported to have made many speeches, which seemed to anyone familiar with the man’s character utterly inconsistent with the whole trend of his ideas.

To old residents of North China, he has been known for many years as an instructor in various military schools.  For a time in 1912 he was acting President of the Peking Government University.  Nearly every prominent military man in North China has been associated with him at one time or another and he has many staunch friends.  But for some reason it does not seem to be generally known in either foreign or Chinese circles that for 18 years General Ma has been working upon a revival of ancient Chinese military training; that he has trained more than 30,000 students in his revivified science and has introduced his system of physical culture into so many branches of the army that more than 300,000 soldiers are indirectly his pupils in a system of physical training designed to school them in self-defence.

The value of the work which General Ma has done can never be appreciated until one has seen a corps of his students going through their exercises.  The foreigner in China usually has the impression that the Chinese take no interest in physical culture and that they would much rather be spectators of exhibitions of physical prowess than participate in any sort of sports.  Perhaps it is because General Ma’s system of training is indigenous and is hallowed by ancient traditions that the Chinese take so kindly to it, but whatever the reason, General Ma’s pupils do take up thir [sic] work with a vim and enthusiasm which would astonish any foreigner who has preconceived notions of the Chinese aversion to rough sports.

"Chinese Stage Shows" Cigarette Card.  Source: Digital Collections of the NY Public Library.

“Chinese Stage Shows” Cigarette Card. Source: Digital Collections of the NY Public Library.

 

The Biggest Thrill on Record.

The writer has witnessed the sports of many peoples, has been in the audiences of all the great circuses and Wild West shows, and is familiar with all the Occidental sports from boxing to lacrosse, but he has never seen a performance in which more skill and agility were shown or an exhibition of rougher horse-play than that which is provided by the men who drill in Tsinan under General Ma Ling’s personal supervision.

The dramatic features of the performance, like all Chinese affairs of the kind, are perfect.  One feels throughout that no feature of the drill was ever designed without having the spectator in mind.  To the European, this detracts a little from the performance and is bound to get the impression that the training is more showy than practical, and while much is done that is exceedingly graceful and requires much agility, it is much better adapted to the theatre than to the actual field of combat.  The Chinese of course never get this impression.

Almost every foreigner who is interested in Chinese affairs has seen displays of sword manipulation in the theatre.  The hero of the piece rushes out with a glittering blade in each hand, slashes the air with them in all directions, does all manner of wonderful acrobatics which frequently force him to turn his unprotected back to the enemy, and one’s Chinese friends explain in an impressed tone after it is all over, that this paragon of agility was fighting fifty enemies.  It would be very unjust to General Ma, indeed, to give the impression that this whole performance is of this character, but there is enough of it introduced to make the Chinese spectators gasp and to make any foreign witnesses who have seen real broadsword contests smile.  If one views the whole performance as nothing more than a show, an entertainment, he is bound to confess it is one of the best he has ever seen, and that most of the acrobats and swordsmen in Chinese theaters are amateurs compared with General Ma’s soldiers, everyone of whom is thoroughly drilled in the various arts of which samples are given during the performance.

 

Stage and Properties.

The show begins gently and placidly with a drill in calisthenics and comes to a climax in a whirlwind of violence in which the performers are groups of sun-blackened over-muscled men of terrific strength and agility, none of whom one would care to meet in the dark.  The drill-ground is a small court in which the earth has been rolled hard and from which every pebbled and fragment of stone has been carefully picked.  Along the wall there is rack of antique Chinese weapons, straight swords, curved swords, lances, halberds, quarter-staves, clubs linked together like flails and many other weapons for which we have no name.  At the south end of the court there is a number of large stone dumb-bells, piles of granite paving stones and little heaps of bricks and tiles which serve an astonishing purpose at the end of the show.

The audience sits under a pavilion at the north end of the court and after tea and cigarettes have been served, a group of students from the training school, which is now supplying instructors in physical culture to the schools in the army of many provenances, file through a gate in the south end of the court and do their calisthenics.

We Occidentals have gone pretty thoroughly into calisthenics, but the Chinese have contrived to devise a system of movements which has little in common with anything one sees in Western gymnasiums.  It seems designed to develop suppleness and double-jointedness rather than muscular strength.  This is very hard to describe, but if one can imagine a system of drill for a class of would-be contortionists, he will have some understanding of the peculiarities of this system.  In a remote city in Shensi, the writer once saw a soldier with his foot on the parapet of the city wall, apparently making a violent effort to make his knee joint bend the wrong way.  He explained that he was preparing his leg muscles against possible strain and this seems to be the basis of Chinese calisthenics.  The muscles are twisted and the joints are strained by every movement and the result is that the boys are remarkably lithe and tough, rather than much developed.

A local militia armed with spears outside of Guangzhou, 1938.

A local militia armed with poles and spears outside of Guangzhou, 1938.

 

Quarter-Staff for the Million.

Following the calisthenics comes a sword drill with straight swords, and following this there is a drill in the use of a quarter staff about six feet long.  At this point in the performance, General Ma will explain to his friends and guests, that in this drill he has devised something which will rejuvenate China and give every man, woman and child not only a good physique, but also self-reliance.  He points out that the Chinese people are poor and that they cannot all possess firearms and be skilled in their use, but that a man with a good-sized club who knows how to use it, can take care of himself almost anywhere and that its constant use will give him and excellent physique.  As he says, almost anyone, no matter how poor, can procure a club, and his training in the use of a club will give a man strength and self-reliance; that if everyone in China could be persuaded to go through this simple training the people would be much more vigorous and aggressive, mentally as well as physically.

As this is a plea which is advanced for drills and gymnasiums of all sorts in every country in which it is vogue, there is nothing novel in the theory to the Occidental, but among the Chinese General Ma’s arguments for universal physical training are probably more unique and somewhat radical.  He declares that the Chinese are too drowsy; that they sleep too much, sit too much and eat too much and that anything which would make them more active physically and more self-reliant in their personal encounters with one another would make them more aggressive and confident as a nation.

The quarter-staff drill is a little more strenuous than calisthenics.  It is followed by exhibitions of boxing in which kicking also plays a part, and which, while it is apparently staged simply as an exhibition of agility and muscular control, involves some pretty hard slapping and kicking. The men dive about the courtyard, landing upon the hard ground in all possible attitudes, roll over lightly, and bound to their feet.  It does not seem to do the least harm to one of these acrobats to slide a few yards along the hard earth on his face, and a vigorous kick in the jaw simply starts one of the boxers on a series of back somersaults which he concludes with a bow and a smile.

 

Wrestling Fast and Furious.

After this comes the wrestling which is fast and furious and which is very evidently no child’s play.  General Ma shows the keenest interest in this and impresses his friends with the fact that it is much more completely developed than the “small part” which the Japanese have borrowed.  To the foreigner it would certainly seem the most business-like and most useful part of the whole performance.

The men strip to the waist and put on short, closely quilted canvas jackets which are belted with long sashes.  The play is too fast and furious for a spectator to understand the rules clearly.  It would seem that all grips are taken upon the canvas jacket, tripping is apparently permissible and while the spectators sometime protest against leg-holds, some of the wrestlers resorted to this.  A man is thrown when he loses his balance and immediately releases his hold upon the adversary.  In most cases, however he does not go down gently, and some of the throws are so violent that the thud of the defeated one’s body resounds throughout the courtyard.

In this phase of the drill the Japanese are of course intensely interested.  General Ma says that thousands of Japanese officers and men have come at one time or another to see the performance, and, according to credible witnesses, one or two of the best wrestlers have thrown every jiu jitsu champion whom the Japanese have been able to bring to Tsinan.

 

A vintage photograph showing Republic era army troops at the Winter Palace in Beijing posing with Stone Wheels and a Wukedao (Heavy Knife).  Source: Author's personal collection.

A vintage photograph showing Republic era army troops at the Winter Palace in Beijing posing with Stone Wheels and a Wukedao (Heavy Knife). Source: Author’s personal collection.

 

The Spectator Gasps.

Highly dramatic combats with lances and swords follows the wrestling and while it is certain that the men purposefully miss one another in their lunges and slashes, they miss by so narrow a margin that the spectator is out of his seat throughout most of the contest.

After these artists come the strong men, as highly developed as any whom we are accustomed to see in the Occident.  One man takes a dumb-bell weighting 266 popnds [sic], tosses it in the air catches it on his upturned forearms tosses it again, catches it in one hand, rests it upon his head and then twirls it about his neck, shoulders and waist.  Another lies upon his back, supports dumb-bells weighting 540 pounds on his feet and hands and upon these a pyramid of nine men is built.  A number of lesser lights perform with lesser dumb-bells, then a man rushes to the front, two others toss a granite paving stone four inches thick on his back and it cracks with a sledge hammer.

This is a signal for a general furor of tile and brick breaking among the acrobats.  They break bricks in their hands, break them over their arms, over the backs of their necks, and over each other’s faces.  One man leans over balances six bricks on the side of his face, while another smashes them all with a seventh.  A man with half a dozen tiles in each hand will clip them over his neighbor’s ears and break them all.  Finally in the midst of this whirlwind of destruction, one round-headed devotee drops on his knees, puts half a brick on top of his head upon which a huge slab of granite is balanced which is then shattered with a sledge hammer.  The show is then over.

 

Silk from a Sow’s Ear.

This is an exemplification of what General Ma is his book describes as “The Chinese New Military Art.”  In this age of tanks, aeroplanes, ponderous artillery and poison gas, the layman is probably puzzled to understand what such a show as that which I have superficially described, has to do with military science.  Military people know, however, that the physical fitness and spirit of the man engaged in modern conflict are still more important than the machinery used.  The layman sees in General Ma’s drill nothing but a highly diverting circus, but the military man sees in it a system of mental and muscular training which takes a loutish and stupid coolie and makes of him an alert, sensitive, highly disciplined man who can be readily trained in the use of any weapon and is prepared to undertake any amount of training, fatigue and hardship.

Military men who have seen the show have told the writer that there is scarcely any feature of it which could not be adapted to Occidental uses, and they all agree that if such a system of physical training were introduced in the Chinese schools it would tremendously enhance the value of the Chinese male population as military ma-[le population as military material.] [sic].

(By Rodney Gilbert in Bulletin of the Chinese Bureau of Public Information.)

 
oOo

If you enjoyed this post you might also want to read: Research Notes: Foreign Attitudes towards Kung Fu in Colonial Hong Kong
oOo


Lives of Chinese Martial Artists (17): Chu Minyi – Physician, Politician and Taijiquan Addict

$
0
0
Chu Minyyi, "Taiji Boxing Photographed."  Source: Brennan Translation Blog.

Chu Minyyi, “Taiji Boxing Photographed.” Source: Brennan Translation Blog.

 

 

 

Introduction: The Architects of Kung Fu Diplomacy

 

I recently had the opportunity to examine a very interesting series of magazine articles, produced in 1920, discussing the efforts of the (in)famous General Ma Liang to promote the study of the traditional martial arts throughout both the Chinese military and state.   The most important thing about these articles was that they were all published in English, and distributed via a coordinated public diplomacy effort, at a time when it is generally assumed that the Western reading public knew nothing about the Chinese martial arts.

Indeed, a certain line of popular thought holds that prior to 1960s the leaders of the martial arts community went to lengths to avoid teaching, or even discussion, their art in the presence of “foreigners.”  The fact that these hand combat systems were being actively promoted in the Western press in an attempt to sway public opinion about Chinese society should be a valuable reminder that there were actually multiple competing discourses surrounding the martial arts in the pre-WWII period.  Not all of them shared the same goals.

Given how little recognition these efforts typically receive I thought that it might be helpful to provide a few profiles of some of the key players in early attempts to interpret and present the Chinese martial arts to international audiences.  The Republic period offers a number of possibilities, but none of them were as energetic as Dr. Chu Minyi.  While his career in the Chinese martial arts was actually rather brief, he had an out-sized impact on the global perception of these fighting systems (and Taijiquan in particular) prior to WWII.

Chu’s life was one of adventure and even intrigue.  He was an exceptionally intelligent individual who enjoyed a varied academic career followed by a stint in the Nationalist government.  These are the achievements that he is normally remembered for.  The last time I checked, his Wikipedia page focused exclusively on these aspects of his career and did not even mention his work as a tireless promoter of the Chinese martial arts.

Andrew Morris has chronicled much of this other thread of Chu’s story in his excellent Marrow of the Nation: A History of Sports and Physical Culture in Republican China (California UP, 2004). Still, in his single chapter section devoted to guoshu he was only able to hit some of the highlights of Chu’s short but spectacular involvement with the martial arts.

Additional information on Chu’s approach to the martial arts can be gleaned directly from the pages of the many of martial arts manuals that were published during the late 1920s and 1930s.  Chu published manuals on Wu style Taiji, as well as his own innovations, in 1929, 1931 and 1933.  Obviously these are all important texts.

Yet even more interesting in some respects was his involvement with other people’s writings.  His name appears (or is shamelessly dropped) widely in manuals produced during this period.  Chu was often called upon to provide inscriptions and gifts of calligraphy that would grace the front-matter of new works.  He actually produced enough of these over the 1930s that it seems possible to observe a subtle evolution in his style of calligraphy.

More important were the prefaces that he wrote for (among others) Wu Zhiqing’s 1931 text on the Zhao school cannon fist method and Wu Tunan’s 1934 manual of taiji saber practice.  It is from these sources, the basic outlines of his political career and Morris’ discussion of his involvement with the Guoshu movement that the following biographical sketch has been assembled.

Still, some words of caution are in order.  While this account attempts to combine multiple aspects of a life which are normally treated in isolation, it is far from complete.  I have a number of outstanding questions about Chu’s personal life and his inner motivations.  He has also been discussed in a number of works of political history that still require additional research.  Lastly, some of his most interesting publications are now quite rare and I have not yet been able to locate copies of all of them.  As such this “sketch” must remain just that.  It is only the first few steps in exploring a remarkable (and tragic) life.

 

Image of a Taiji Boxer.  Source: Burkhardt, 1953.

Image of a Taiji Boxer. Source: Burkhardt, 1953.

 

 

Early Life

 

Chu Minyi was born into a gentry family living in the Wuxing district of Zhejiang province in 1884.  His father was a distinguished physician and was able to provide his son with a fine education.  During the concluding decades of the Qing dynasty (for the sons of rich families) this often meant cutting short a strictly Confucian education so that promising students could be sent to schools in Japan, Hong Kong or the West.  This exposure to western learning became a hallmark of the rising “new gentry” class and would create many of the reformers that drove the early stages of China’s nationalist revolution and period of rapid reforms.

In 1903 (at the age of 19) Chu was sent by his family on the first of many foreign expeditions.  Initially he traveled to Japan where he studied both economics and politics.  Later he traveled to Singapore, joined a revolutionary chapter of the Tongmenghui, and then he and the fiery Zheng Jingjiang (who would go on to become one of the “Four Elders of the KMT”) went on to France.  There they joined a group of Chinese anarchist supporting revolutionary causes in the home country.

Chu proved to be not only intellectually but also politically energetic.  In 1911 he returned briefly to Shanghai, where he took up a leadership position in the Tongmenghui in support of the revolution.  Unfortunately he quarreled with Song Jiaoren and soon left once more for Europe.  There he followed in his father’s footsteps and earned degrees in both medicine and pharmacology.

In 1915 Chu rushed to China, this time to resist Yuan Shika’s attempt to establish a new Chinese empire.  Yet once again the political conditions were not ripe for relocation and he returned to Europe.  In 1921 he took up the position of Vice President of the Institut Franco-Chinois of the University of Lyons.  A year later he moved on to the University of Strasbourg where, in 1925, he earned his doctorate.

In 1925, following the death of Sun Yat Sen, Chu finally made a more permanent relocation to China.  He settled in Guangzhou and was subsequently named as a member of the KMT’s Educational Commission.  He also assumed an important academic post as the head of the Guangdong University’s medical school.  At the age of 41 Chu had finally returned “home.”  But that does not mean that he was content to sit still.

 

The way of softness will succeed" Chu Minyi's inscription for Wu Jianquan's 1935 manual.  Source: Brennan Translation Blog.

“The way of softness will succeed” Chu Minyi’s inscription for Wu Jianquan’s 1935 manual. Source: Brennan Translation Blog.

 

The Taijiquan Years

 

In much of his later writing Chu would describe himself as a “Taiji addict.”  No doubt this was a vivid image at a time when opium and heroin addiction were crippling public health epidemics in cities like Shanghai and Guangzhou.  He practiced his beloved art daily, and (as his many shirtless pictures attest) Chu kept himself in top physical shape.

In some of his biographical writings he mentions that he was always physically active, and studied various forms of calisthenics while in Europe.  Yet I have seen nothing in his life history to suggest that he studied the martial arts while on his long educational sojourn.  This Western educational background would have a profound impact on Chu.  Throughout the rest of his career he would seek to place both “national strengthening” efforts and martial arts on a firm scientific footing.

After 1925 Chu’s life work took on a different character.  Politics and a growing obsession with the martial arts came to replace his earlier academic appointments.

This transformation began when Chu boarded a train headed for Shanghai.  There he met with the renowned Taijiquan teacher (and founder of the Wu-style) Wu Jianquan.  Apparently Wu agreed to teach the young official and even allowed him to photograph each of the postures in his form for future study.  And study them he did, as well as the teaching of Wang Zhiqun and Wu Zizhen after returning to his post in Guangdong.  When he eventually returned to Shanghai he resumed his studies with Xu Zhiyi, a disciple of Wu Jianquan.

This period of intensive instruction lasted until approximately 1929. Chu’s relatively late start in life, and short period of instruction, should serve as an inspiration for “non-traditional” martial arts students everywhere.

Of course this was also a dynamic period in the development of the Chinese martial arts.  When Chu arrived in China the Jingwu Association was just past the height of its fame and doing much to promote the martial arts as a form of physical cultivation suitable to the growing urban middle class.  Purged of its superstitious and feudal associations it was capable of strengthening both the psyche of the people as well as their bodies leading, in their own words, to “national salvation.”  As both an ardent nationalist and physical fitness enthusiast this message must have been deeply appealing to Chu.

Financial difficulties soon halted the rise of the Jingwu Association, but its lessons had been learned.  The KMT quickly moved to establish its own national martial arts program under the banner of the Central Guoshu Institute.  Chu saw in this move a chance to combine his love of physical culture with a winning political cause.  He was quick to jump on the Guoshu bandwagon.

A portrait of Wu Jianquan from "Taiji Boxing Photographed."  Source: Brennan Translation Blog.

A portrait of Wu Jianquan from “Taiji Boxing Photographed.” Source: Brennan Translation Blog.

 

In the December 1928 issue of the Educational Review, in an article titled “Central Committee Member Chu Min Yi’s Great Hopes for the Guoshu: Presenting Glad Tidings to All of Humanity” he laid out his opening salvo (p. 3-4).

“We know that Chinese Boxing Styles are the finest of all he guoshu and provide even healthy physical development.  We can scientize them now, using methods of science to do this research—but how do we do it?  It requires paying attention to mechanics and psychology, looking into physiology and hygiene, setting down rules and methods, and explaining them with sound theory….

Our goals in working to promote guoshu are to gather together all those who excel in martial arts and all of the finest points of martial arts.  Then we can give this organized, systematized, scholarly, and methodological guoshu to all the people of the world…spreading Chinese guoshu to the entire world will mean glad tidings for humanity.” (Translation quoted from Morris, p. 22).

This succinct statement outlined the path that Chu would follow over the next decade.  When discussing this period authors generally focus on the topics covered in his first paragraph, the reform, modernization and “scientization” of the traditional martial arts to make them a strong tool to support the state in its revolutionary struggles.  This was, after all, the critical struggle facing the guoshu establishment.  Declarations of “taking the Chinese martial arts to the world” are often seen as elaborate rhetorical flourishes, placed in texts such as this more for the psychological benefit of Chinese readers than foreign ones.

I would like to suggest that it may be time to start taking the second half of Chu’s statement just as seriously as the first.  It is true that Republic era reformers failed to make the Chinese martial arts popular in the West prior to the outbreak of WWII. They also failed to bring the unity and rationalism that they sought to impose on their own hand combat community.  Yet both of these efforts are important for what they suggest about the ways that certain individuals in the KMT sought to use the martial arts as a tool of statecraft.

Specifically, the nature of any sort of nationalist discourse is such that it will always reach at least two audiences, one domestic and the other global.  Policy makers may try and isolate these two realms, to control the flow of information between them.  Yet information always leaks.

More adept leaders realize this and try to use this property of strategically motivated speech to their advantage.  This is done by crafting statements that both bolster the unity of the body politic domestically while increasing the respect (or fear) that the state garners in the international realm.

The political scientist Robert Putnam famously characterized this paradox of strategic communication within the international realm through the metaphor of a “two level chess game.”  Being a policy leader is difficult as you face at least two related, but different, simultaneous games, the domestic and the international one.

These can be envisioned as two differently configured chess boards.  Yet as a policy maker you only have a single set of pieces that appear on both boards.  The challenge of strategic speech (and action) is to come up with a single move that maximizes your outcomes (or minimizes losses) across a variety of opponents at the same time.

Martial Arts reformers such as Chu would have been intimately familiar with the basic logic of Putnam’s paradox.  They would also have known that, properly played, this situation could strengthen the hand of the traditional martial arts within Chinese society.  After all, the Japanese cultivation of Budo had proved to be a masterstroke of strategic communication.  On the one hand it had helped to unify domestic society and strengthen the state.  Yet it had also proved to be a powerful international symbol of Japanese strength, uniqueness and legitimacy as a rising power in the realm of global politics.

Chu would have known from first hand observation that Westerns looked to arts like Judo and Kendo in an attempt to understand the Japanese “national character.” By in large they liked what they saw during the 1920s and early 1930s.  And in an increasingly interconnected world no country could afford to ignore the imperatives of global public diplomacy.

This was especially true if China wished to gain western support in fending off Japanese imperialist claims.  Demonstrating that the people had the physical strength and spiritual will to resist these efforts was critical to China’s public diplomacy.  Thus the guoshu effort was never simply domestic in nature.  It derived much of its potential value from the fact that Chinese policy makers expected that their efforts would be observed and commented upon by other states in the international system.

This strategy required real effort, and a fundamental rethink of what the Chinese martial arts should be.  In a previous era, when they had functioned largely as a means of ensuring one’s economic prospects as a soldier, guard, opera performer, bandit, pharmacist or the like, secrecy made a good deal of economic sense.  The monetary benefits of a skill were linked to their scarcity, and they accrued to an individual.   In an era when most martial arts methods did not even have names, the emphasis was on either local defense or personal attainment and prestige.

Nor did these considerations magically disappear within the folk martial arts sector at the dawning of the Republic.  For Chu and other reformers these older attitudes were a real danger.  In their view a martial art did not belong to a single teacher or small lineage organization.  They were rightly understood as the property of the nation as a whole.  To keep them secret was both to rob your neighbor and flirt with disaster should a master die before properly training a successor.

Throughout the writings of the guoshu period there is a palatable feeling of horror that dominates these discussions of secrecy. It is certainly evident in Chu’s own writings during the 1930s.  I suspect that this sentiment is a natural result of a shift in perspective in which the martial arts are transformed from a type of private to community property.  The fact that this debate went on for as long as it did would suggest that ultimately the guoshu reformers were not very successful in bringing the folk martial arts community to heel.  But that is a topic for a different post.

Chu’s next major text was released in 1929.  It was a full length training manual titled “Taiji Boxing Photographed.”  The text began with a guest preface and an introduction by the author.

Chu’s introduction to this work is uncharacteristically partisan.  He harshly attacks the various forms of Shaolin Kung Fu that were then popular and emphasizes his personal achievements with Taiji’s training methods.  This introduction is short and it stands out as it so visibly contrasts with his later writings.

In later efforts Chu would go to lengths to disavow Kung Fu’s traditional rivalries and argue for the centrality of national strengthening over personal attainment.  As such his 1929 document seems to be a transitional piece, still reflecting an enthusiasm for Wu style Taijiquan that has not yet been subordinated to the demands of the nation and the masses.

One of Chu Minyi's training devices. Source: Brennan Translation Blog.

One of Chu Minyi’s training devices. Source: Brennan Translation Blog.

 

Other tensions are also apparent in this early document.  In addition to important photographs of Wu Zhiqing, this manual starts with a reprint of the corpus of Later Imperial texts commonly called the “Taiji Classics.”  These sit in dynamic contrast with the final section of the text in which Chu demonstrates the construction and use of a number of special machines that he has created for the express purposes of practicing the more tactile aspects of Taijiquan in the absence of a training partner.  These devices include a heavy ball suspended from elastic cords and a free spinning horizontal bar likewise suspended from the interior of a square metal frame.

Chu is quick to point out that these “scientific” devices are in no way superior to the assistance of a skilled training partner.  Yet he goes to great lengths to discuss their value in “modern” training situations.  After all, what mechanical devices lack in psychological intent they make up for in the ability to mass produce an identical experience that can be experienced by a wide range of students in a number of locations.  Each of these students, working on identical machines, is free to imagining their fellows engaged in the modern, scientific, and solidly bourgeois study of China’s new Guoshu arts.  While these may be grounded in the country’s ancient cultural heritage, Morris notes that Chu consistently goes to lengths to reimagine the martial arts as something only accessible to China’s educated middle class.

Shortly after the publication of this first manual Chu’s official responsibilities found him on a ship returning to Europe.  In 1930 he headed up China’s educational display at the “International Exhibition” in Liège.  This proved to be an important trip for Chu.  He brought a number of his Taiji balls so that he could demonstrate their use in the traditional martial arts and physical training to a foreign audience.  In doing so he hoped to prove that China had both a uniquely ancient system of physical education, but one that could be rationalized, taught and reproduced through mechanical and scientific means.

While on the ship he reports that he also turned his mind to the problem of bringing Taiji to the masses.  Like other reformers during the period he noted the difficulties in teaching a form as long and complicated as those typically seen in the Yang and Wu styles to casual students. They took too long to learn and, worse yet, were too easily forgotten.

Like other figures (including Zheng Manqing) Chu responded by creating his own short form.  This, when combined with other concepts and movements, formed the basis of Chu’s “Tai Chi Calisthenics,” perhaps his most important contribution to the martial arts of the 1930s and 1940s.

After returning to China in 1931 his initial manual on Tai Chi Calisthenics was published, and then expanded and rereleased in 1933.  Andrew Morris notes that in the same year he had his exercises translated into English and French so that they would be more accessible to a global audience.  He even dropped the somewhat intimidating term “Tai Chi” from their titled and renamed them simply “circular exercises” for the benefit of Western readers (pp. 226-227).  These translated exercises were then presented to a global audience at the Belgian Centennial Exhibition.

Chu’s evolving stance on the martial arts was also captured in the 1931 preface that he contributed to Wu Zhiqing’s manual on Zhao School boxing.  Note for instance that his previous disdain for Shaolin boxing has been replaced with a new sense of ecumenical brotherhood…as long as all sides agreed to turn their secrets over to the nation.  After all, Chu reasons, China is entering a dangerous period of national competition, and the martial arts have a role to play in these struggles.

 

“Chinese martial arts can be roughly classified into two branches: Wudang and Shaolin, commonly known as internal training and external training. Although they are different in origin and development, their aim of bringing strength and health to the body is the same. Therefore we should not be biased toward one or the other, but should instead advocate both. Sectarianism is the biggest hindrance to learning and development, and it is unfortunate that colleagues within the martial arts world will often use it to try and one-up each other, which rarely leads to progress. But worst of all are the naive and stubborn who keep their treasure for themselves and are not willing to reveal what they have learned nor freely teach it to others. Although they may have an amazing skill, every bit of it will be lost forever unless they can be generous enough to share what they have….

The way of survival is that the superior succeed and the inferior perish, the stronger animals devouring the weaker. It is entirely a matter of national determination as to whether we will ascend to become one of the strong and prosperous nations. Our rise or fall as a nation is simply a matter of whether or not we strengthen the people as a whole. To achieve this, we must first of all pay particular attention to physical education. Martial arts are the special treasure of our nation, truly the highest form of physical education, and they are a far more economical use of our time and money than exercises such as Western calisthenics. If we encourage capacity to engage in martial arts, then it will not be that they cannot be popularized…..”

 

Chu was relentless in promoting his new training regime and he seized any platform that he could to demonstrate his system.  Perhaps his finest domestic performance came in 1933 when he borrowed and trained 2,000 local school children who demonstrated these methods (led by Chu himself) at the National Games in Nanjing.

Chu Minyi's famous Taiji Ball.  Source: Brennan Translation Blog.

Chu Minyi’s famous Taiji Ball. Source: Brennan Translation Blog.

 

In 1934 Wu Tunan’s Wu Style Taiji Saber was released complete with a preface contributed by Chu Minyi.  Again, the entire thing is important, but for our purposes the most interesting aspect of his discussion is the single minded focus on the national, rather than individual, nature of the Chinese martial arts.  It was this corporate responsibility that demanded a “rational and scientific” approach to reforming the Chinese martial arts.  Anything short of this was simply national suicide:

 

“Therefore we nowadays should strive to rectify these mistakes of previous generations. It is inappropriate to only use martial arts as a way to gain individual health and happiness. We should instead have a deep concern for the well-being of the group, and we should look upon martial arts as a means of more efficiently strengthening our people, thus we should humbly do our utmost to popularize these arts. We especially should meticulously study them, arranging everything about them to make them systematic and organized, then compile them into specialized books to be widely circulated, sometimes even coming up new methods that are more convenient to learn if we have to. In order to be able to make progress in carrying this out, we will, all of my comrades, have to work hard together.”

 

A dedication to publishing as a way of demonstrating the new-found middle class “respectability” of the martial arts was a hallmark of the entire Republic period.  Chu seems to have been especially active in this area, but he was not wedded to the medium of the printed word.  Rather, he adopted the most modern means that he had at his disposal to spread the gospel of Taijiquan as well as his own Tai Chi Calisthenics.

In 1935, in conjunction with the Venus Film Company, Chu commissioned the production of a newsreel showing him demonstrating various aspects of Chinese traditional physical culture.  This included Taijiquan, Tai Chi Calisthenics, his training devices as well as traditional archery and even shuttlecock.  His stated purpose in making the film was to have something to show when he traveled abroad that would illustrate the martial arts.

I suspect that multiple versions of the film were eventually produced.  A 1937 Chinese language copy was printed for domestic consumption and it likely contains the earliest visual record of Wu style Taijiquan.  Andrew Morris, on the other hand, reports that Chu had a German language version made which was shipped to Europe and entered into the 1936 Olympic Sports and Physical Education Film Contest where it was displayed for western audiences (p. 227).

Indeed, the 1936 Olympics, held in Berlin, were a critical event in the history of China’s Kung Fu diplomacy.  While their Olympic team turned in a lackluster performance on the playing fields, Chu had something special planned for the closing ceremonies.  There his team of handpicked martial artists performed an hour long demonstration of the traditional Chinese fighting arts.  Their efforts were greeted with enthusiasm by a crowd of 30,000 onlookers.  The event included demonstrations of Taijiquan and weapons work, but it was a Chu’s own Tai Chi Calisthenics that opened the performance.

In an attempt to explain to the public what they had just seen Chu Minyi also wrote a 28 page pamphlet as an official guide to Chinese delegation’s Guoshu performance.  This is now a fairly rare piece of ephemera, and I have yet to locate a copy.  But a description from an auction catalog, discovered by the Taijiquan writer Martin Boedicker, noted that the pamphlet contained identical texts written in English, French and German.  Apparently Chu wanted to be sure that the wisdom of China’s traditional physical culture would reach as large a Western audience as possible.

 

A portrait of Chu Minyi circa 1940.  Source: Wikimedia.

A portrait of Chu Minyi circa 1940. Source: Wikimedia.

 

 

Conclusion

 

The Japanese invasion of China in 1937 had a profound effect on the remainder of Chu’s career.  Initially he found himself trapped in Shanghai by the pitch battle fought over the city.  When his brother-in-law, Wang Jingwei, formed the pro-Japanese Nanjing Nationalist Government Chu joined his administration and held a number of important positions.  He spent much of 1940 and 1941 as its foreign minister attempting to negotiate the Axis power’s diplomatic recognition of the collaborationist government.

Chu used his new political platform to promote his training methods.  These were subsequently declared the “citizens calisthenics” by the Nanjing government.  Yet any such victories were short lived.

In August of 1945, after the Japanese surrender, Chu was arrested by Republic forces in Guangdong.  In April of 1946 he was tried for treason and, despite some showings of public sympathy, was executed for his crimes against the state.  Even his last moments illustrate the dynamic tensions that characterized his engagement with the martial arts.  Morris reports that his final act was to perform a Taijiquan form before his astonished executioners, demonstrating the equanimity of the sages of old.  Yet his officially recorded last words are a request that his body be donated to the local hospital to advance the cause of scientific medical research.

This biographical sketch is already longer than I intended.  Unfortunately a number of critical questions remain. After living a life abroad why, at the age of 41, did Chu turn to the study of Taijiquan?  And how did it become such an obsession?

Was this an attempt to emotionally or spiritually reconnect with the “essence of a nation” that he had fought for from a distance?  Was it a calculated political decision to advance his career when it appeared that Guoshu would become an important element of KMT statecraft?  And if the violent events of 1937 had not intervened, what other plans did Chu have for advancing the TCMA on a global stage?

Chu’s life would make a fascinating, if tragic, film.  As we examine his various actions it becomes evident that, on a fundamental level, it is impossible to disentangle the domestic and the international discourses that surround the martial arts.  They are tightly linked, both reinforcing the other.  Chu understood this truth better than some others.

When Republic era martial arts reformers translated their materials into Western languages, or claimed a mandate to spread Kung Fu to a global community, rather than dismissing these statements as vacuous rhetorical flourishes, Chu Minyi’s career strongly suggests that perhaps we should take them at their word.  Even a brief examination of his contributions reveals that the TCMA’s engagement with the global system is both older and more complex than many students have previously recognized.

oOo

If you enjoyed this article you might also want to read:  Lives of Chinese Martial Artists (10): Chen Shichao and Chen Gongzhe: Creating the Jingwu Revolution
oOo

 


The Chinese Repeating Crossbow, Double Swords and the “Oriental Obscene”

$
0
0
A studio image of two Chinese soldiers (local braves) produced probably in Hong Kong during the 1850s. Note the hudiedao (butterfly swords) carried by both individuals. Unknown Photographer.

A studio image of two Chinese soldiers (local braves) produced probably in Hong Kong during the 1850s. Note the hudiedao (butterfly swords) carried by both individuals. Unknown Photographer.

 

 

 

 

Introduction: J. G. Wood and the Popularization of the “Oriental Obscene.”

 

The following post introduces a few accounts of the Chinese (and other Asian) martial practices taken from a book first published in the United Kingdom during the 1860s.  When discussing sources such as these I find that there is a tendency to dwell on the rediscovery of “the first” account of some sort of behavior or art.   In this case I am very happy to say that the Rev. J G. Wood broke no new ground.  That is precisely what makes his early, and often overlooked, accounts so interesting to students of martial arts studies.

Wood was deeply interested in natural history, and he dedicated much of his life to researching, studying and writing about the varieties of biological and social life.  Born in London in 1827, and educated as a member of the clergy (at Oxford), he gained a fair amount of fame in his lifetime for his writings and innovative lectures on the natural world.  Yet Wood was not really a research scientist.  Instead he excelled as a popularizer of scientific thought.   While Wood was never the first person to write on some new topic, he was often the second.  And what he wrote entered the public discussion.

These facts are easily confirmed.  Wood’s books were best sellers during his lifetime and went through many editions.  They also managed to be referenced in the popular culture of their day.  Both Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Mark Twain cited or referenced Wood’s encyclopedic collections in their own works of popular fiction.

While Wood seems to have been preoccupied with the natural sciences, on a few occasions he did venture into the field of traveler’s tales and ethnographic accounts.  This is not surprising as by the second half of the 20th century travelogues had become one of the most popular genera of popular literature throughout the West.  Thus it would not be unusual for a professional author with a penchant for collecting to try his hand at such a profitable game.  Wood’s most popular (and frequently reprinted) effort in this area was the two-volume set The Uncivilized Races, or Natural History of Man (1868).

Readers should note, however, that Wood was not a global explorer.  After becoming a professional lecturer late in life he did have the opportunity to visit North America on a number of lecture tours.  Yet he did not directly observed most of the societies he discussed in The Uncivilized Races.  Like Frazer and Durkheim, he conducted his ethnographic research in the library.  In the social realm, as in the natural, Wood popularized preexisting discourses rather than creating them.

This is precisely what makes him so useful to us.  The problem with spending huge amounts of effort to locate the lost and forgotten “very first account” of some obscure practice is that it was so often ignored by its intended audience.  That is precisely why these things are so hard to find.  The same forces that make them obscure today often limited their relevance even to their contemporaries.

Yet if we want to know what the general level of understanding of Chinese, Japanese and Indian martial practice was during the middle of the 19th century, Wood is a good place to start.  And if we are interested in the ways in which the Western public imagined these practices and their connection to social violence during the 1860s, he is invaluable.  While far from groundbreaking his volume reminds us of the sorts of accounts that would have been available to a curious reader able to gain entrance to a fair sized library during the second half of the 19th century.  And there is more there than one might think.

This brings us to the content of Wood’s collection.  In this post I have excerpted a single section of his discussion of warfare in 19th century China as it will be of the greatest interest to readers of Kung Fu Tea.  Yet Wood also reported accounts of the martial and military arts (broadly defined) of the Manchu, Japanese and Indian peoples as well.  As such this volume presents us with an opportunity to observe the ways that these discourses were starting to diverge in the 1860s.

Wood’s Chinese chapter seems to be driven by his own preoccupation with weapons and weapon collecting.  After a discussion of Chinese field artillery and siege guns (omitted from my post as it is mostly of interest to military historians) he turns to a discussion of more familiar topics.  These include one of the most detailed period discussions of the Chinese repeating crossbow I have ever seen (a weapon that Wood had obvious admiration for and found to be totally ingenious in its operation and simplicity), the types of swords and double swords seen in public sword dancing displays, and finally the use of extreme means of torture and execution by the Chinese judicial system.

I have always been fascinated by the repeating crossbow, and so I was happy to run across Wood’s assessment of the weapon’s design and capabilities.  And it is fascinating (though not unprecedented) that a resident of the UK could speak with confidence about the sorts of Kung Fu displays that they had observed in their home country during the middle of the 19th century. I did, however, omit most of the discussion of torture and execution that takes up the majority of this chapter.

On the one hand this material is not terribly relevant to how we define the martial arts today.  Yet I did include the introduction to the section because it appears to have been very relevant to how Wood and others understood the parameters and meaning of social violence within China during the 1860s and 1870s.  While at one point the author finds himself making a mental equivalence between the practice of a Chinese sword dancer and western fencer (speculating that the later would likely get the better of the former), it is clear that for the most part he did not view the Western and Chinese realms of the “martial arts” to be equivalent.

When discussing the military (and recreational) practices of Europe, Wood, like any good child of the enlightenment, emphasized rationality and efficiency.  Yet when discussing the Chinese (and to a lesser extent other Asian nations) the physical practice of these arts could not be separated from the cultural and psychological impulse towards cruelty and actual sadism that he saw throughout society.  His readers are burdened with oddly personalized stories of graphic tortures and executions in an attempt to raise a level of sympathy for the Chinese people.

Yet they are informed, in almost the same breath, that these same long suffering victims are primed to unleash similar cruelties on their own vanquished enemies.  Like others in his generation Wood built an image of China’s national character (as well as its fighting arts) grounded in a culturally conditioned impulse towards cruelty.

Such account only became more common in the popular literature with the rise in anti-Christian violence and the approach of the Boxer Rebellion (1899-1900).  By this era there is often a sharp divide in how the Chinese and Japanese martial arts are discussed in Western texts.  While the Chinese arts are still imagined as the preview of dirty market place performers, religious fanatics and sadistic jailers, judo and kendo are held up as important cultural accomplishments and a key to understanding the Japanese miracle.

Importantly no such tendency is yet evident in Wood’s work.  Published in the 1860s (and relying on accounts that were even older), the Samurai are still very much a living presence in Wood’s vision of Japan, and this does nothing good for his opinion of that country’s martial arts.  Wood seems to have adopted the popular late Tokugawa civilian opinion of the Samurai class which saw them only as a repository of derelict and dangerous individuals who, more often than not, contribute little to the actual support of society.

Wood notes with some relish the similarities between urban, low ranking, Samurai and the Western tradition of “swashbucklers.”  He dwells on scenes of Japanese swordsmen testing their blades of stay dogs, leaving dismembered and disabled animals in their wake.  Nor would it have been hard to find Japanese merchants or artisans who would have agreed with Wood’s critique of the moral development of the samurai.  It seems that the real (notably unromantic) Samurai needed to vanish before either Japanese or Western society could develop an acute case of nostalgia for their martial pursuits.

Wood’s accounts of both the Chinese and Japanese military classes focused on powerful symbols of cruelty and disorder.  While he discussed instances of Chinese sword dancing, and the precursors of modern Japanese Kendo and Sumo wrestling, these activities seem to have been viewed as ultimately extensions of pathological cultural processes.  The Western reading public knew about them.  Even by the 1860s they had entered some level of popular discourse.  But they were not yet seen as the sorts of practices that anyone would want to make a Sunday afternoon hobby of.

Sylvia Shin Huey Chong may be of some help in thinking about Wood and what his work suggests about the place of the Japanese and Chinese martial practices (and violence more generally) in 19th century popular thought.  In a book titled The Oriental Obscene: Violence and Racial Fantasies in the Vietnam Era, she puts forth an analysis of popular media in the 1980s that argued that the image of Asians as both the perpetrators and victims of horrific acts of violence and brutality reflected the psychological state of a country dealing with the fallout of a war of imperialist aggression in an era when Asians were becoming an ever more visible aspect of America’s social landscape.

While reading Wood I was struck by this same dual portrayal of Chinese citizens as both victims of unimaginable violence and incorrigible sadists.  Further, these accounts also emerged in the wake of a number of imperialist wars in Asia, and at a time when China was increasingly becoming a central hub in the global trade network (indeed, that was the root cause of the Opium Wars).

Obviously there are many aspects of Chong’s carefully argued critique that are unique to the post-Vietnam American experience.  Still, her basic insights may help us to make sense of some of the most puzzling, and troubling, aspects of Wood’s treatment of Asian martial practices.  Ultimately the obsession with judicial violence in accounts like his may suggest more about social state of 19th century Europe than China itself.  Nor would these attitudes disappear quickly.  They would linger and in some cases be reinforced by the conflicts of the 20th century.  The reemergence of these attitudes (commented on by Chong and others) followed a well-worth pathway in Western popular culture.
Repeating Crossbow

Chinese Warfare

 

“The most characteristic Chinese weapon with which I am acquainted is the repeating crossbow (shown on page 1425), which, by simply working a lever backward and forward, drops the arrows in succession in front of the string, draws the bow, shoots the missile, and supplies its place with another.  The particular weapon from which the drawings are taken was said to have been one of the many arms which were captured in the Peiho fort.

It is not at all easy to describe the working of this curious bow, but, with the aid of the illustration, I will try to make it intelligible.

The bow itself is made of three strong, separate pieces of bamboo, overlapping each other like the plates of a carriage-spring, which indeed it exactly resembles.  This is mounted on a stock, and, as the bow is intended for walled defense it is supported in the middle by a pivot.  So far, we have a simple crossbow; we have now to see how the repeating machinery is constructed.  Upon the upper surface of the stock lies an oblong box, which we will call the “slide.”  It is just wide enough to contain the arrows, and is open above so as to allow them to be dropped into it.  When in the slide, the arrows necessarily lie one above the other, and, in order to prevent them from being jerked out of the slide by the shock of the bowstring, the opening can be closed by a little wooden shutter which slides over it.

Through the lower part of the slide a transverse slit is cut, and the blow string is led through this cut, so that the string presses the slide upon the stock.  Now we come to the lever.  It is shaped like the Greek letter [illegible] the cross-piece forming the handle.  The lever is jointed to the stock by an iron pin or bolt, and to the slide by another bolt.  Now, if the lever be worked to and fro, the slide is pushed backward and forward along the stock, but without any other result.

Supposing that we wished to make the lever draw the bow, we have only to cut a notch in the under part of the slit through which the string is led.  As the slide passes along the stock, the string by its own pressure falls into the notch, and is drawn back, together with the slide, thus bending the bow.  Still, however much we may work the lever, the string will remain in the notch, and must therefore be thrown out by a kind of trigger.  This is self-acting, and is equally simple and ingenious.  Immediately under the notch which holds the string, a wooden peg plays loosely through a hold.   When the slide is thrust forward and the string falls into the notch, it pushes the peg out of the hole.  But when the lever and the slide are drawn backward to their full extent, the lower end of the peg strikes against the stock, so that it is forced violently through the hole, and pushes the string out of the notch.

We will now refer to the illustration.  Fig. 1 represents the bow as it appears after the lever and slide have been thrust forward, and the string has fallen into the notch.  Fig. 2 represents it as it appears when the lever has been brought back, and the string released.

A is the bow, made of three layers of male bamboo, the two outer being the longest.  B is the string.  This is made of very thick catgut, as is needed to withstand the amount of friction which it has to undergo, and the violent shock of the bow.  It is fastened in a wonderfully ingenious manner, by a “hitch” rather than a knot, so that it is drawn tighter in proportion to the tension.  It passes round the end of the bow, through a hole, and presses upon itself.

C shows the stock and D the slide.  E is the opening of the slide, through which the arrows are introduced into it, and it is shown as partially closed, by the little shutter f.  The lever is seen at G, together with the two pins which connect it with the stock and slide.  H shows the notch in the slide which receives the string.  I is the pivot on which the weapon rests, K is the handle, and L the place whence the arrows issue.

If the reader should have followed this description carefully, he will see that the only limit to the rapidity of fire is the quickness with which the lever can be worked to and fro.  As it is thrust forward, the string drops into its notch, the trigger-peg, the arrow is propelled, and another falls into its place.  If, therefore, a boy be kept at work supplying the slide with arrows, a constant stream of missiles can be poured from this weapon.

The arrows are very much like the “bolts” of the old English cross-bow.  They are armed with heavy steel heads, and are feathered in a very ingenious manner.  The feathers are so slight, that at first sight they appear as it they are mere black scratches on the shaft.  They are, however, feathers, projecting barely the fiftieth of an inch from the shaft, but being arranged in a slightly spiral form so as to catch the air and impart a rotary motion to the arrow.  By the side of the cross-bow on Figure 2 is seen a bundle of arrows.

The strength of the bow is very great, though not as great as I had been told.  It possesses but little powers of aim, and against a single and moving adversary would be useless.  But for the purpose for which it is designed, namely, a wall-piece which will put a series of missiles upon a body of men, it is a very efficient weapon, and can make itself felt even against the modern rifle.  The range of this bow is said to be four hundred yards, but I should think that its extreme effective range is at most from sixty to eighty wards, and that even in that case it would be almost entirely useless, except against large bodies of soldiers.

 

Chinese execution

 

Of swords the Chinese have an abundant variety.  Some are single-handed swords, and there is one device by which two swords are carried in the same sheath and are used one in each hand.  I have seen the two sword exercise performed, and can understand that, when opposed to any person not acquainted with the weapon, the Chinese swordsman would seem irresistible.  But in spite of the two swords, which fly about the wielder’s head like the sails of a mill, and the agility with which the Chinese fencer leaps about and presents first one side and then the other to this antagonist, I cannot think but that any ordinary fencer would be able to keep himself out of reach, and also to get in his point, in spite of the whirling blades of the adversary.

Two-handed swords are much used.  One of these weapons in my collection is five feet six inches in length, and weighs rather more than four pounds and a quarter.  The blade is three feet in length and two inches in width.  The thickness of metal at the hilt is a quarter of an inch near the hilt, diminishing slightly towards the point.  The whole of the blade has a very slight curve.  The handle is beautifully wrapped with narrow braid, so as to form an intricate pattern.

There is another weapon, the blade of which exactly resembles that of the two handed sword, but it is set at the end of a long handle some six or seven feet in length, so that, although it will inflict a fatal wound when it does strike an enemy, it is a most unmanageable implement, and must take so long for the bearer to recover himself, in case he misses his blow, that he would be quite at the mercy of an active antagonist.

Should they be victorious in battle, the Chinese are cruel conquerors, and are apt to inflict horrible tortures, not only upon their prisoners of war, but even upon the unoffending inhabitants of the vanquished land.  They carry this love for torture even into civil life, and display a horrible ingenuity in producing the greatest suffering with the least apparent mean of inflicting it.  For example, one of the ordinary punishments in China is the compulsory kneeling bare-legged on a coiled chain.  This does not sound particularly dreadful but the agony that is caused in indescribably, especially as two officers stand by the sufferer and prevent him from seeking even a transient relief by shifting his posture.  Broken crockery is sometimes substituted for the chain……”

J. G. Wood. 1876. The Uncivilized Races of All Men in All Countries. Vol. II. Hartford: the J. B. Burr Publishing Co. Chapter, CLIV China—continued. Warfare.—Chinese Swords. pp. 1434-1435. (Originally published in 1868.)

 

oOo

If you enjoyed this article you might also want to read:  London, 1851: Kung Fu in the Age of Steam-Punk

 

oOo



Chinese Martial Arts in the News: June 6th, 2016: Taijiquan, Wing Chun and The Final Master

$
0
0
Ken Chun Talks Wing Chun. Source:

Ken Chun Talks Wing Chun. Source: http://www.examiner.com

 

 

Introduction

 

Welcome to “Chinese Martial Arts in the News.”  This is a semi-regular feature here at Kung Fu Tea in which we review media stories that mention or affect the traditional fighting arts.  In addition to discussing important events, this column also considers how the Asian hand combat systems are portrayed in the mainstream media.

While we try to summarize the major stories over the last month, there is always a chance that we have missed something.  If you are aware of an important news event relating to the TCMA, drop a link in the comments section below.  If you know of a developing story that should be covered in the future feel free to send me an email.

Its been a while since our last update so there is a lot to be covered in today’s post.  Let’s get to the news!

 

Daniel Wu, being interviewed for CCTV.com

Daniel Wu, being interviewed for CCTV.com

 

News from All Over

Summer is blockbuster movie season, and that certainly shows in the current news update.  A particularly interesting set of reports came out on CCTV’s English language TV and internet networks over the last couple of weeks.  They featured Daniel Wu who generated a lot of publicity for his portrayal of the complex hero Sunny on AMC’s Into the Badlands.  Now he is back in the news, this time for his role as an Orc villain in the fantasy film Warcraft.  CCTV has released a major profile on Wu commenting on his impact on American popular culture, as well as his quest to find the right balance of body and spirit through the martial arts.  Also see here.  Readers should also consider how these interviews function in the framing of the TCMA for the purposes of English language public diplomacy.

Chinese deputy Premier Deng Xiaoping and retired world champion Muhammad Ali [ alias cassius Clay] shake hands in Beijingat a meeting during which Deng invited Ali to return to China to train boxers for the 1984 Olympics, December 19, 1979. AP PHOTO

Chinese deputy Premier Deng Xiaoping and retired world champion Muhammad Ali [alias Cassius Clay] shake hands in Beijing at a meeting during which Deng invited Ali to return to China to train boxers for the 1984 Olympics, December 19, 1979. AP PHOTO

I am sure that by this point you are all aware of the passing of the boxing legend Muhammad Ali.  I also suspect that a number of Kung Fu Tea’s readers also followed his career with interest.  While looking through the South China Morning Post I came across an important news item relating to Ali’s role in restoring the popularity of western style boxing in China following the end of the Cultural Revolution and promoting its eventual re-legalization.   Students of Chinese martial studies may find this corner of Ali’s history to be particularly fruitful.

 

 

Contemporary Chinese Masters Search for Ancient Martial Virtue

 

Meanwhile, a very different sort of profile has been running on the other side of the Pacific.  The Epoch Times (based in New York City) recently ran a piece on Li Youfu, who will be the head judge at this years International Chinese Traditional Martial Arts Competition.  As you might expect the discussion quickly turns to spiritual matters and Li’s relationship with the Falun Gong movement (a valuable reminder that private groups can also harness the power of Kung Fu diplomacy, making this a contested space).  But there is also an interesting historical dimension to this discussion, including the various ways in which the Cultural Revolution actually accelerated Li’s martial arts training.  As such this article hits on a couple of the topics that we have been discussing at Kung Fu Tea over the last few months.

 

Pushing Hands at the 108 Studios. Source: Fiona Lee/hoodline

Pushing Hands at the 108 Studios. Source: Fiona Lee/hoodline

Switching to the West Coast, Hoodline had a very nice piece titled “Pushing Hands: Tai Chi in Chinatown Draws Old and Young.”  More than just a profile of a single school, this article provided an overview of the San Francisco Taijiquan scene and even dipped into the area’s rich martial arts history.  Overall a nice, if somewhat short, piece.

Kung Fu Grandma

Zhang Hexian, 93, leading a group of Kung Fu practitioners. Source: http://www.womenofchina.cn

Multiple Chinese tabloid and news outlets have been promoting stories and video of Zhang Hexian, a 93 year old resident of Ninghai, Zhejiang Province, who has been practicing the martial arts for nine decades.  Not much detail was provided about her specific style, other than the fact that its a family tradition, now open to anyone interested in Kung Fu.  You can read more about her here.  Or, if you would like to see her in action, click this link.  Needless to say she appears to be the (eternally vital) archetype of the “little old Chinese martial artist”  that has launched so many kung fu pilgrimages.

 

Taijiquan. Source: Edwin Lee/flickr

Taijiquan. Source: Edwin Lee/flickr

The last few weeks have also seen the public discussion of a number of new studies focusing on the various benefits of regular (low impact) Taijiquan practice for senor citizens.  Perhaps the biggest news is one study purporting to demonstrate that the practice of this martial art can have the same impact on a patient’s blood pressure as a pharmaceutical regime.  Another study looked at how the focus on balance and strengthening in Taiji helped some senior citizens lessen their fear of falling in daily life.  Finally, one last article examined the health benefits of this practice for those with arthritic knees.  So maybe there is something to that archetype after all….

A statue of Bruce Lee erected in the Los Angeles Chinatown. Source: english.peopledaily.com.cn

A statue of Bruce Lee erected in the Los Angeles Chinatown. Source: english.peopledaily.com.cn

 

 

Why Bruce Lee is Still Relevant.”  That was the title of a think piece published on the Esquire Middle East blog recently.  The post focused on Lee’s role in the popularization and normalization as the Asian martial arts in the West and how great that has been as a corrective to the overly lax, self-esteem indulging, education that most kids are getting in school these days.  The post quickly devolves into a rant in favor of increased discipline and hierarchy in education, leading me to suspect that the author lacks even a passing familiarity with the life or thought of the individual who wrote the manifesto-like essay “Liberate Yourself from Classical Karate.” So all things considered, this is a valuable reminder that “the author is dead” and none of us will get to define, let alone control, our intellectual legacies.

Images of Bruce Lee and his mother. Source: Charles Russo/Fightland.

Images of Bruce Lee and his mother. Source: Charles Russo/fightland.com

Bruce Lee fans who are a little more attentive to details and controversies surrounding his life may want to check out Charles Russo’s latest post over at the Fightland blog.  It is titled “Was Bruce Lee of English Descent?”  Then, after you are done with that, you will want to review this essay by Paul Bowman discussing the actual significance of questions like this.  Russo is also a long-time friend of Kung Fu Tea and readers should definitely check out his recent book on the early history of the Chinese martial arts in the Bay Area.

healthy fast food chain.wing chun

John Vincent, co-founder of Leon (left) with Julian Hitch. Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk

The Telegraph recently ran an article on John Vincent, the co-founder of the upscale fast food restaurant Leon (in the UK).  He discussed both his background in Wing Chun, business strategy, and how there is basically no conceptual space between the two.  Vincent has even added elements of martial arts training to his workplace to increase efficiency and employee well being while reducing wastage.  Its an interesting discussions which in some ways sees Wing Chun as shading into a “lifestyle brand.”  This is certainly not the first time that I have run across this idea, but its something that I generally associate with other Chinese arts (especially Taijiquan).

That was not Wing Chun’s only appearance in the news.  The Examiner published an interview with Ken Chun.  You can see Part I of the interview here.

 

The Final Master. Source: LA Times.

The Final Master. Source: LA Times.

 

Chinese Martial Arts in Film

 

Wing Chun will be making another appearance on the big screen, this time in the guise of Xu Haofeng’s latest film “The Final Master.”  Xu was the co-writer of Wong Kar-wei’s Ip Man bio-pic “The Grand Master.”  This film also features a complex and engaging story, but visually it is an entirely different movie.  If nothing else blades, rather than fists, seem to be the true star.  Rather than a return to the visual fantasy of Wuxia dramas, these swords remain elegant yet gritty, giving the entire project a feeling of “blade-fu.”  While I don’t endorse the films love of the reverse grip (at least not with something the size of a butterfly sword), fans of the hudiedao now have a film to call their own.  And both the Hollywood Reporter and LA Times seem to like it.

Donnie Yen. Source: Time Out Hong Kong

Donnie Yen. Source: Time Out Hong Kong

Regular readers of these news updates will know that Donnie Yen has been on an extended media tour for a couple of months now.  All of this has been sparked by the success of Ip Man 3 (which he says will be his last kung fu film) and the building anticipation over his appearance later this year in Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.  In this interview Yen talks about both of those projects, his future plans, and the under-representation of Asians in Hollywood (based on China buying power in today’s global media market).  But the most interesting thing about this interview was that he reflected on his mom, who is a very accomplished TCMA master living and teaching in Boston.  I have been kicking around the idea of doing a profile on her for a while now, so I was fascinated to see her being discussed in the media.  If you are Donnie Yen fan this interview is worth checking out.

chengmanching_sword

A number of reviews of Barry Strugatz’s documentary, The Professor: Tai Chi’s Journey West (2016), examining the NY phase of Zheng Manqing’s career have come out in the last couple of weeks.  For two examples see the pieces in the Hollywood Reporter and the LA Weekly.  You can see my own review of it here.  Readers should also note that the upcoming edition of Martial Arts Studies will carry a review by Douglas Wile who has previously studied and written on the life of Zheng. The Professor will premier in NYC on June 9th.

Kendo and Judo as part of life in the Japanese Navy. Source: Vintage Postcard. Author's personal collection.

Kendo and Judo as part of life in the Japanese Navy. Source: Vintage Postcard. Author’s personal collection.

 

Martial Arts Studies

There has been a lot of activity in the martial arts studies community over the last few weeks.  To begin with, we are currently putting the finishing touches on the second issue of the interdisciplinary journal Martial Arts Studies.  This will be a thematic issue examining a variety of topics surrounding the “invention of the martial arts.”  I will post an announcement on this blog as soon as the issue is ready to go public, and I am sure that some of the articles and reviews will inspire discussion.

Virtual Ninja Manifesto

Rowman & Littlefield Press has just announced the release of the first book in their new martial arts studies book series.  The Virtual Ninja Manifesto: Gamic Orientalism and the Digital Dojo, by Chris Goto-Jones, is poised to expand the borders of martial arts studies.

Navigating between society’s moral panics about the influence of violent videogames and philosophical texts about self-cultivation in the martial arts, The Virtual Ninja Manifesto asks whether the figure of the ‘virtual ninja’ can emerge as an aspirational figure in the twenty-first century. Engaging with the literature around embodied cognition, Zen philosophy and techno-Orientalism it argues that virtual martial arts can be reconstructed as vehicles for moral cultivation and self-transformation. It argues that the kind of training required to master videogames approximates the kind of training described in Zen literature on the martial arts. Arguing that shift from the actual dōjō to a digital dōjō represents only a change in the technological means of practice, it offers a new manifesto for gamers to signify their gaming practice. Moving beyond perennial debates about the role of violence in videogames and the manipulation of moral choices in gamic environments it explores the possibility that games promote and assess spiritual development.

I had a chance to look at an early version of this manuscript and its a fascinating project.  Given the importance of video-gaming in shaping current popular discourses about the martial arts, it will be nice to have some theorizing in this area.  Chris Goto-Jones is Professor of Comparative Philosophy & Political Thought at Leiden University, where he was previously Professor of Modern Japan Studies. He is also a Professorial Research Fellow of SOAS, University of London.

 

Paris_Match_-_child_soldier_cover-799974

Paul Bowman has just announced a new forthcoming volume titled Mythologies of Martial Arts (also published by Roman & Littlefield).  This short volume, modeled in many ways as a response to Barthes’ 1957 classic Mythologies, is Bowman’s most accessible work yet.  I also had a chance to take a look at some early chapters of this project.  While his 2015 volume, Martial Arts Studies, has already had an impact on scholarly discussions, I think that this book is poised to reach a much larger audience.  You can see a more detailed description of the project here.  Expect a release date sometime in November.

Stephen Chan delivering the conferences opening keynote. Source: http://martialartsstudies.blogspot.com/2015/06/conference-2015-and-2016.html

Stephen Chan delivering the conferences opening keynote. Source: http://martialartsstudies.blogspot.com/2015/06/conference-2015-and-2016.html

 

There are also a number of conferences coming up this year that will be of interest to students of martial arts studies.  Building on the success of last years effort, the Second Annual Martial Arts Studies conference will be held at Cardiff University from July 19th-21st.  If you are going to be in the UK there is still time to register, but please hurry as arrangements are currently being made for the dinners.  This is looking like it will be a great conference with an impressive group of speakers and presenters.

On October 6th-8th the German Sports University in Cologne will be hosting a conference titled “Martial Arts and Society – On the Societal Relevance of Martial Arts, Combat Sports and Self-Defense.”  This years conference will also feature English language sessions so please check out their call for papers.  I will be attending this conference to deliver one of the keynotes and look forward to meeting a broader slice of the martial arts studies community.

Chinese American students in San Francisco.

Chinese American students in San Francisco.

Are you thinking of teaching an undergraduate martial arts studies class?  What happens in the classroom is, in many ways, just as vital to the growth of our field as the progress on the research front.  As such I am always on the lookout for new syllabi.  Recently Jeffrey T Martin of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Anthropology) posted his syllabus for Asian Martial Arts Anthro 399 to Academia.edu.  Take a look at what his students will be discussing.

Kung Fu Tea.charles russo

Kung Fu Tea in NYC. Photo by Charles Russo.

 

Kung Fu Tea on Facebook

A lot has happened on the Kung Fu Tea Facebook group over the last few weeks.  We discussed snake kung fu, vintage taijiquan pictures, and the Hakka martial arts in Hong Kong. Joining the Facebook group is also a great way of keeping up with everything that is happening here at Kung Fu Tea.

If its been a while since your last visit, head on over and see what you have been missing.

 

 

 

 


Hunting a Tiger with a Kukri

$
0
0

Kukri.Gurkha.Tiger

 

The reader will probably notice that whatever may be their form, there is a nameless something which designates the country in which they were produced.  No matter whether the weapon has belonged to a rich or a poor man, whether it be plain wood and iron, or studded with jewels and inlaid with gold, the form remains the same, and there is about that form a graceful elegance which is peculiar to India.  Take, for example, that simplest weapon, the kookery, and see how beautiful are the curves of the blade and handle, and how completely they satisfy the eye.

J. G. Wood. 1876. The Uncivilized Races of All Men in All Countries. Vol. II. Hartford: the J. B. Burr Publishing Co. p. 1400 (Originally published in 1868.)  

 

 

 

 

 

Introduction

 

It may surprise regular readers of Kung Fu Tea to learn that some of the most popular articles I have ever posted have been those dealing with the identification, history and collecting of kukris.  For some prior examples see here, here or here. These unique knives are not only popular among Nepalese soldiers, farmers and hikers, but they have become something of a national symbol.

Nor is their symbolic value confined to Nepal.  Within the Western imagination these iconic knives have also come to be closely associated with the Nepalese people.  They have seen combat with Gurkha troops fighting alongside the British army in World Wars One and Two as well as more recent conflicts in places like Iraq and Afghanistan.  Great acts of heroism have been carried out by soldiers armed with these knives.  Indeed, following the usage of Barthes in his classic 1957 work of cultural criticism, Mythologies, the visual image of a loyal Gurkha soldier, armed with his trusty Kukri, has become one of the great “mythologies,” or symbolically laden popular images, of the modern UK.

Yet when, and how, did these images emerge?  WWI was a watershed moment in popularization of the modern image of the Gurkha and his kukri.  Yet the current post suggests that the roots of this powerful mythology extends much further back in time, all of the way to the middle of the 19th century.

It also suggests some of the ways in which the practice of assembling and displaying great collections of ethnographic arms became a powerful medium by which individuals in the West came to understand their world, and laid the foundation for the creation of the modern cultural complex which Sylvia Shin Huey Chong has referred to as the “Oriental obscene.”  While her research looked specifically at the aftermath of the West’s post-WWII conflicts in Asia, the history of the kukri suggest that the roots of what she observed reach far deeper into the popular psyche.

To explore these questions we will once again be returning to the pages of The Uncivilized Races of All Men in All Countries, by the Rev. J. G. Wood.  I dealt with Wood’s background and literary career in a previous post, and do not wish to repeat all of that material here.  It may be sufficient to remind readers that while he was trained for the ministry Wood actually found his greatest success in life as a lecturer and writer on natural history.

He is not remembered for his research.  Rather, his great contribution was to become a highly successful author capable of popularizing this new scientific approach and bringing its findings into the public sphere.  To use the modern parlance, Wood was more of a “scientific communicator” than a “scientist.”

Few of the subjects that he wrote about were totally his own.  Yet in the current case this lack of originality is precisely what makes Wood of interest.  In this essay we are concerned not so much with actual “discovery” of the kukri by Western explorers, but with the construction, dissemination and popularization of its mythos.

It may seem odd to some readers that Wood, whose great interest was the varieties of biological life, would be writing what amounted to an early ethnographic guide book.  Readers may wish to consider two facts in mind as they go forward.  First, during the second half of the 19th century travelogues became one of the most popular and, best selling, genres of literature.  It is understandable that Wood, who sometimes worked as a professional lecturer, would want to get in on the act.

Yet this transition was complicated by the fact that Wood was not an accomplished world traveler.  Though he did visit North America on a number of occasions, he never observed most of the people or places on which he passed judgement in Uncivilized Races.  Like so many other 19th century ethnographers, his research was confined to the library and the display halls of England’s great private and public collections.

This last location is of particular importance when weighing Wood’s writings on the kukri.  Like other gentlemen of his day, Wood maintained an extensive private collection of natural and ethnographic artifacts.  Follow the fashion of the times, various weapons collected from the far reaches of the UK’s newly acquired “Oriental empire” were prominently displayed throughout.  In an era before the widespread adoption of large public museums, such private collections were an important window that both looked onto, and framed, the world.

I have discussed this subject as it relates to Chinese arms and armor in other posts. It suffices to say that some of these arms were acquired as the spoils of war while others were brought back as souvenirs by soldiers and merchants.  Still others were swept up in a growing antiquities market and were auctioned off in cities like London and NY.  All of them functioned as powerful witnesses to the essential nature of the colonial system.

While the average reader in 1868 would not have had a chance to collect, or even see, such treasures, Wood’s publication drew them into these discussions.  Notice the way in which he frames the account of the kukri’s characteristics and uses.  Any thought that the kukri might be a versatile tool as well as a weapon (found in farmhouses across the country) is dismissed out of hand.

Instead he begins by recounting the skill of kukri wielding troops in the 1815-1816 Anglo-Nepali War.  At the time of his writing these events were already 50 years old, but it was still a puzzle to him that individuals of such small size, and wielding rather primitive arms, could perform so well against the forces of the East India Company.  The kukri itself, described in almost mystical terms, gets much of the credit.

Second, we are told of the manner in which (then contemporary) Nepalese individuals use their kukri in tiger hunts.  If the prior account was overly romantic, this one takes on the characteristics of pure fantasy.  While tiger hunts were real events, they did not consist of lone individuals armed only with a knife heading out into the wilderness.  Nor are tigers so obligingly predictable in their means of attack.  As you read Wood’s account it becomes clear that not only has he never seen a big cat attack, but it is rather doubtful he has ever seen a tiger in action at all.

Yet as Barthes, or Paul Bowman, would remind us, the mythologies of popular culture do not derive from careful ethnographic observation.  They are a multi-layer affair, one in which the animal nature of the tiger is juxtaposed with the animal nature of his hunter (“brave as a lion” and “active as a monkey.”) The heroics of a Gurkha dispatching a tiger reinforce his heroics in the service of the Crown.  Surely the empire must be seen as legitimate and a force for good if it can command the loyalty of men such as these?

Yet each of these symbols has its own dark side.  Lions are not only brave, they are also dangerous.  Monkeys are “active,” but are generally not seen as very intelligent or placed on the same level of civilization as men.  And what uses would these razor sharp kukris be put to if not for British intervention in India?

While the UK’s various wars in India are brushed off as events of the past, in truth they hang heavily on Wood’s account.  Ironically the kukri, now residing safely in the collections of gentlemen across Great Britain, has become a master symbol not only of the Nepalese people, but of the UK’s growing “Oriental empire.”

 

kukri.tiger claw.J G Wood

 

 

Chapter XCLIX

 

India—continued.

Weapons

 

One of the hill tribes, called the Ghoorka tribe, is worthy of notice, if only for the remarkable weapon which they use in preference to any other.  It is called the “kookery,” and is of a very peculiar shape.  One of the knives, drawn from a specimen in my collection, is given in illustration No. 2, on page 1403.  As may be seen by reference to the drawing, both the blade and hilt are curved.  The blade is very thick at the back, my own specimen, which is rather a small one, measuring a little more than a quarter of an inch in thickness.  From the back it is thinned off gradually to the edge, which has a curve of its own, quite different to that of the back, so that the blade is widest as well as thickest in the middle, and tappers at one end towards the hilt and at the other towards the point.

The steel of which the blade is formed is of admirable temper, as is shown by the fact that my specimen, which, to my knowledge, has not been cleaned for thirty years, but has been hung upon the wall among other weapons, is scarcely touched with rust, and for the greater part of its surface is burnished like a mirror.  Indeed, on turning it about I can see reflected upon its polished surface the various objects of the room.  The handle is made after a very remarkable fashion, and the portion which forms the hilt is so small that it shows the size of the hand for which it was intended.  This smallness of hilt is common to all Indian swords, which cannot be grasped by an ordinary English soldier.  My own hand is a small one, but is too large, even for the heavy sabre or “tulwar,” while the handle of the kookery looks as if the weapon were intended for a boy of six or seven years old.  Indeed, the Ghoorkas are so small, that their hands, like those of all Indian races, are very delicate, about the size of those of an English boy of seven.

The point of the kookery is as sharp as a needle, so that the weapon answers equally well for cutting or stabbing.  In consequence of the great thickness of the metal, the blade is exceedingly heavy, and it is a matter of much wonder how such tiny hands as those of the Ghoorkas can manage so weighty a weapon, which seems almost as much beyond their strength as does the Andamaner’s gigantic bow to the dwarfish man who wields it.  It may be imagined that a blow from such a weapon as this must be a very terrible one.  The very weight of the blade would drive it half through a man’s arm, if it were only allowed to fall from a little height.  But the Ghoorkas have a mode of striking which resembles the “drawing” cut of the broadsword, and which urges the sharp edge through flesh and bone alike.

Before passing to the mode in which the kookery is used, I may mention that it is not employed for domestic purposes, being too highly valued by the owner.  For such purposes two smaller knives are used, of very similar form, but apparently of inferior metal.  These are kept in little cases attached to the side of the Kookery-sheath, just as is the case with knives attached to a Highlander’s dirk, or the arrangement of the Dyak sword, which has already been described in the article upon Borneo.  There is also a little flat leather purse, with a double flap.  This is pointed like a knife-sheath, and is kept in a pocket of its own fastened upon the larger sheath.

In the illustration the kookery is shown with all of its parts.  Fig. 1 shows the kookery in its scabbard, the top of the purse and the handles of the supplementary knives being just visible as they project from the sheaths.  At Fig. 2 the kookery itself is drawn, so as to show the peculiar curve of the blade and the very small handle.  Fig. 3 represents the purse as it appears when closed, and figs. 4 and 5 are the supplementary knives.

My own specimen, which as I have already mentioned, is a small one, measures fifteen inches from hilt to point in a straight line, and twenty-one inches if measured along the curve of the back.  The knife is a very plain one, no ornament of any kind being used, and the maker has evidentially contended himself with expending all his care upon the blade, which is forged from the celebrated “wootz” steel.

This steel is made by the natives in a very simple but effectual manner.  After smelting the iron out of magnetic ore, the Indian smith puts small pieces of wood with them.  He then covers the crucible with green leaves and plenty of clay, and puts it in his simple furnace.  The furnace being lighted, a constant blast of air is driven through it for about three hours, at the expiration of which time the iron, now converted into cast-steel, is found in the form of a small cake at the bottom of the crucible.  Wootz steel was at one time much used in England, and great numbers of these cakes were imported.

A member of the 4th Gurkha regiment in 1880 holding a kukri similar (or possibly identical to) the one current offered by IMA.

A member of the 4th Gurkha regiment in 1880 holding a kukri.

In the hands of an experienced wielder this knife is about as formidable a weapon as can be conceived.  Like all really good weapons, its efficiency depends much more upon the skill than the strength of the wielder, and thus it happens that the little Ghoorka, a mere boy in point of stature, will cut to pieces a gigantic adversary who does not understand his mode of onset.  The Ghoorka generally strikes upward with the Kookery, possibly in order to avoid wounding himself should his blow fail, and possibly because an upward cut is just the one that can be least guarded against.

Years ago, when we were engaged in the many Indian wars which led at last to our Oriental empire, the Ghoorkas proved themselves most formidable enemies, as since they have proved themselves most invaluable allies.  Brave as lions, active as monkeys, and fierce as tigers, the lithe, wiry little men came leaping over the ground to the attack, moving so quickly, and keeping so far apart from each other, that musketry was no use against them.  When they came near the soldiers, they suddenly crouched to the ground, dived under their bayonets, struck upward at the men with their kookeries, ripping them open with a single blow, and then, after having done all the mischief in their power, darting off as rapidly as they had come.  Until our men learned this mode of attack, they were greatly discomfited by their little opponents, who got under their weapons, cutting or slashing with knives as sharp as razors, and often escaping unhurt from the midst of the bayonets.  They would dash under the bellies of the officers’ horses, rip them open with one blow of the kookery, and aim another at the leg of the officer as he and his horse fell together.

Perhaps not better proof can be given of the power of the weapon, and the dexterity of the user, than the fact that a Ghoorka will not hesitate to meet a tiger, himself being armed with nothing but his Kookery.  He stands in front of the animal (see the next page), and as it springs he leaps to the left, delivering as he does so a blow toward the tiger.  As the reader is aware, all animals of the cat tribe attack by means of the paw; and so the tiger, in passing the Ghoorka, mechanically strikes at him.

The man is well out of reach of the tiger’s paw, but it comes within the sweep of the kookery, and, what with the blow delivered by the man, the paw is always disabled, and often fairly severed from the limb.  Furious with pain and rage, the tiger leaps round, and makes another spring at his little enemy.  But the Ghoorka is as active as the tiger, and has sprung round as soon as he delivered his blow, so as to be on the side of the disabled paw.  Again the tiger attacks, but this time his blow is useless, and the Ghoorka steps in and delivers at the neck or throat of the tiger a stroke which generally proves fatal.

The favorite blow is one upon the back of the neck, because it severs the spine, and the tiger rolls on the ground a lifeless mass.  For so fierce is the tiger’s fury, that, unless the animal is rendered absolutely powerless, rage supplies for a few moments the place of the ebbing life, and enables it to make a last expiring effort.  All experienced hunters know and dread the expiring charge of a wounded lion or tiger, and, if possible, hide themselves as soon as they inflict the death wound.  If they can do so, the animal looks round for its adversary, cannot see him and at once succumbs; whereas, if it can espy its enemy, it flings all its strength into one effort, the result of which is frequently that the man and the tiger are found lying dead together.

Many of these little hunters are decorated with necklaces made from the teeth and claws of the animals which they kill.  One of these necklaces is in my collection, and is figured in illustration No. 1, on page 1403.  It is made of the spoils of various animals, arranged in the following way.  The central and most prominent object is one of the upper canine teeth of a tiger.  The man may well be proud of this, for it is a very fine specimen, measuring five inches and a half in length, and more than three inches in circumference.  This tooth is shown at Fig. 5.  At Fig. 1 is a claw from a fore-foot of a tiger, evidentially the same animal; and at Fig. 9 is a claw of the hind-foot.  Figs. 2, 3, 7, 8 are differently sized teeth of the crocodile; and Fgs. 4 and 6 represent claws from the foot of a sloth-bear.  The reader may remember that in all uncivilized countries such spoils are of the highest value, and play the same part with regard to them that titles and decorations do among more civilized nations.  Consequentially, it is almost impossible to procure such ornaments, the natives having as strong objection to part with them as a holder of the Victoria Cross would have to resign at the same time his badge and the right to wear it….

J. G. Wood. 1876. The Uncivilized Races of All Men in All Countries. Vol. II. Hartford: the J. B. Burr Publishing Co. pp. 1394-1399 (Originally published in 1868.)  pp. 1394-1399. [Additional paragraph breaks have been added to ease reading in an electronic format].

 

Antique kukri hand picked from the AC warehouse. Probably mid 19th century. Authors personal collection.

Antique kukri, hand picked from the Atlanta Cutlery warehouse. Probably mid 19th century. Author’s personal collection.

oOo
If you enjoyed this you might also want to read: Through a Lens Darkly (28): Three Visions of the Kukri

oOo

 

 

 


From the Archives: Ming Tales of Female Warriors – Searching for the Origins of Yim Wing Chun and Ng Moy.

$
0
0
A painting of Hua Mulan.

A painting of Hua Mulan.

 

***We are currently in the final push to prepare and release the second issue of the interdisciplinary journal Martial Arts Studies.  This will be a themed issue examining different aspects of the “invention of the martial arts” in a wide variety of settings and time periods.   Paul Bowman and I are very excited about the selection of articles and reviews that we will be presenting later this week.  But at the moment all hands are needed for the final round of proof-reading, editing and otherwise preparing the issue for its impending release.  As such we will be revisiting an important discussion from the archives, touching on the prehistory of the Wing Chun mythos, for today’s post.  Enjoy!****

I propose to speak on fairy-stories, though I am aware that this is a rash adventure.  Faerie is a perilous land, and in it are pitfalls for the unwary and dungeons for the overbold.  And overbold I may be accounted, for though I have been a lover of fairy-stories since I learned to read, and have at times thought about them, I have not studied them professionally.  I have been hardly more than a wandering explorer (or trespasser) in the land, full of wonder but not of information.

J.R.R.Tolkien. “On Fairy Stories.” 1939.

 

Introduction

 

These are the words with which J.R.R. Tolkien, the distinguished author and professor of English, began the 1939 Andrew Lang Lecture at the University of St. Andrews.  The entire essay is well worth reading.  Tolkien had devoted considerable thought to the growth and evolution of stories and he was well aware that they take on a life of their own.  If we were to substitute the words “martial arts mythology” for “fairy stories,” the preceding quote sums up many of my feelings towards our own subject.

The early Republic of China period generated an enormous body of new martial arts folklore.  As a community we are still identifying, contemplating and digesting a lot of this material.  Some critics, upon learning that the wine they drink is not of the vintage that they first assumed, are prone to dismiss the entire exercise as a fraud.  They wish to get as far back into the “authentic martial arts” as they can and often see the relatively late Republic period as one of hucksters “diluting the arts.”  Yet in most instances the wine actually tasted pretty good before anyone stopped to take a closer look at the label.

Herein lies our dilemma.  Many of the elements of the traditional arts that are the most popular today, generating the most excitement with audiences in both the East and the West, are not the ancient and “authentic” material, but rather the later innovations of the 1920s and 1930s.  If we were to simply throw out everything that was “new” and return to some arbitrarily dictated “golden age” (1800, 1600, 1100, 500…….) we would not just discard a lot of recent marketing, but also much of what attracts people to the traditional Chinese martial arts in the first place.

Consider for example the Wing Chun creation myth.  Wing Chun is one of Southern China’s more recent boxing styles.  Its mythology claims that the arts dates back to the 1720s at the earliest, whereas most hand combat schools prefer to situate their genesis at an even earlier point in China’s long history.

Almost all of these claims are massively exaggerated.  Yet ironically the order of the points on the timeline is approximately correct.  Wing Chun is a younger art.  Its first organization probably dates to the middle of the 19th century and it was later reformed in the Republic period.

This relative newness has done nothing to prevent the art from generating a rich body of folklore.  Its mythology even has some interesting and unique features.  For instance, students often marveled that Wing Chun is one of the few martial arts from China to be “invented by a woman.”

Nor does this association with the feminine principal appear to be some sort of fluke.  Both the creator of the art (Ng Moy, a survivor of the destruction of Shaolin) and her student, (Yim Wing Chun, who was forced to fight a challenge match to prevent a forced marriage) were women.  It was only in the third generation that male students entered the art.

The gender of these two individuals had a profound effect on the development of Wing Chun.  Ng Moy began with the standard Shaolin arts, but after becoming a recluse in South West China she had a vision of a crane fighting a snake.  Only after this revelation was she able to combine both evasive movements and structured direct attacks in a way that would allow a smaller fighter, like a woman, to overcome a much larger and stronger opponent.

Of course Ng Moy was a master of the martial arts.  Her abilities are the stuff of legend.  The real question was whether this system could be taught to a new student, one without any physical advantage or extensive training in the martial arts?

 

Female student studying Wushu in a scene from Inigo Westmeier's Dragon Girls.

Female student studying Wushu in a scene from Inigo Westmeier’s Dragon Girls.

 

The story of Yim Wing Chun provides us with the perfect proof of concept.  The older woman takes the young daughter of a tofu merchant to her mountain retreat where she initiates her into the mysteries of her art.  Upon descending from the mountain the young girl promptly proves that a smaller person can defeat a much larger opponent by employing the proper principals and structures.  Fittingly it was Yim Wing Chun who gave her name to the art.

Modern Wing Chun students still love this story.  I have provided only the briefest outline of it above, but it is rich in meaning and symbolism.  It is amazing how much understanding a thoughtful reader can pull out of it.

The only problem is that this myth is generally read as a historical account.  In fact it is a piece of popular literature.  I say literature, rather than folklore, quite intentionally.  This is not the sort of thing that orally evolved over a long period of time, at least not in its present form.

Rather, some individual, probably working in the 1930s, sat down and appropriated certain stock characters from Wuxia martial arts novels that had been recently published in the area, possibly combined them with older traditions from the White Crane or Hung Gar clan, added in what might be an authentic (or partially-authentic) genealogical name list, and consciously composed the story that we have today.   I have already discussed the details of this process (particularly as they apply to the evolution of the character Ng Moy) elsewhere.

Nevertheless, this story was not created in a vacuum.  If it was it would be easy for students of Chinese martial studies to ignore it.  One could simply write it off as a flight of fancy or as a particularly effective advertising gambit.

I do not think that this would be very wise in the present case.  To begin with, it is an interesting (and fairly sophisticated) example of the sort of storytelling that was going on all over the hand combat community.  The martial art story telling tradition was not new.  There had been a vibrant market in cheaply printed martial arts novels throughout the late Qing.  But it was usually authors and publishers who generated the mythology.  Martial artists seem to have been more concerned with their military, law enforcement, operatic or criminal careers.

As the nature of the economy changed in the early 20th century the creation of public commercial hand combat schools became a possibility.  Each of these newly created institutions discovered that they needed the sort of historical authenticity that can only be provided by a really compelling backstory.  Schools from earlier periods may have had their own backstories as well, but most of the ones that we possess now date from the early years of the 20th century, or just a little earlier.

Other things changed beyond the sheer volume of stories that were published.  New types of characters emerged.  One of the most interesting things about the Republic period literature was the sudden proliferation of female heroes in these stories.

Traditionally wuxia novels, like the martial arts themselves, had been a male dominated domain.  It is true that there are occasional references to female knights-errant in some of the older works.  There is even a female hero in the classic novel Water Margin.  But these figures were very much the exception that proved the rule.

Very rarely did women appear in older martial stories and when they were mentioned it was almost never in a heroic capacity.  Instead they were often used as a malignant plot device to give the male hero a chance to “restore the proper social order.”

All of this begins to change in the Republic period.  Certain reform movements (most notably Jingwu) began to actively teach and cultivate female martial artists, giving them an increased prominence in society.  But even before that there was an explosion of female characters in martial arts stories.  These characters manage to break out of the stereotyped roles of “virgin-martyr” and “femme fatale” and become actual heroines.  They also appeared in a wide range of stories, from the comic to the historic and even the tragic.

This literary trend should be remembered when reading the story of Yim Wing Chun and Ng Moy.  There are certainly older stories of female warriors, but these two characters were imagined and put to paper at the height of the popular interest in martial arts heroines.  The very fact that the Wing Chun creation narrative focuses so closely on a pair of female warriors, and is so self-conscious in its discussion of how a smaller and weaker “female” body could defeat a stronger and larger “male” one, is yet another piece of circumstantial evidence that we are dealing with a literary creation of the early-mid Republic of China period.

The thing that I find most interesting about all of this, and which most discussions tend to ignore, is that a story which was explicitly composed to address the tastes and needs of individuals in Southern China in the 1930s can continue to speak so strongly to individuals on the other side of the world today.  That is a remarkable achievement and one to be admired.

Martial arts fiction is actually much more complicated than something like wine, which simply improves with age.  It is more like a gourmet soup.  It has many ingredients, some of which blend imperceptibly together, while others stand out providing high notes and a sense of depth.  To the uniformed it may look as though the chef simply pours everything into the pot and stirs, but there is usually some very important selection that goes into a good recipe, or story.

Is it possible to look at these stories and guess what ingredients went into them?  Can we understand how the 1920s narratives of female warriors were constructed and why they struck such a cord with audiences?  Certain large elements within the Wing Chun narrative are easily identified, though it is hard to ascertain what their original form was before they went into the pot.

The female creator of Yong Chun White Crane can be seen in both the later stories of Ng Moy and Yim Wing Chun.  Further, the Cantonese Opera Singers with their ill-fated rebellion is easily distinguished.

 

Professor Tolkien at Oxford University.  Incidentally this is what an academic office is supposed to look like!

Professor Tolkien at Oxford University. Incidentally this is what an academic office is supposed to look like!

 

But what else can we detect floating in the broth?  What sorts of ideas about female warriors were common in popular culture and why did they start to rise to the top at the end of the Qing dynasty?    In the same essay that I quoted earlier Tolkien warns that such an enterprise is difficult and possibly not as profitable as it might be hoped:

 “…with regard to fairy stories, I feel that it is more interesting, and also in its way more difficult, to consider what they are, what they have become for us, and what values the long alchemic processes of time have produced in them. In Dasent’s words I would say: ‘We must be satisfied with the soup that is set before us, and not desire to see the bones of the ox out of which it has been boiled.’”

In both literary and ethnographic terms his advice is sound.  Once we have separated our dinner into its various components it will no longer be “soup.”  In the quest for the bones we will have lost some of the emergent properties that made these stories so powerful and interesting to us in the first place.  Still, to the historian bones can be a useful thing.

 

 

Tang Saier: Buddha Mother and Rebel Warlord

 

David Robinson, in his book on Ming social history (Bandits, Eunuchs and the Son of Heaven, Hawaii UP, 2001), argues quite convincingly that we have generally underestimated the importance of violence in daily life during even relatively peaceful eras of dynastic history.   China’s history was literally written by Confucian scholars who saw the word in deeply ideological terms.  They sought to promote a certain vision of the past so as to guide the decisions of rulers in the future.  In their narrative violence is a tragic aberration, or the result of social disorder in either society or the court.

Robinson instead argued that violence was a regular feature of daily life in late imperial China.  The government and the military were chronically underfunded and understaffed.  Without the cooperation of local “men of action” it was impossible to accomplish any task from clearing the road of bandits to collecting tax payments.  There was an actual “economy of violence” that stretched through all levels of society, from the highest eunuchs at the court down to village thugs.  This market in violence was just as complicated, and essential to the good governance of the kingdom, as any other aspect of the economy.

It should come as no surprise then to learn that the sphere of women often intersected with the economy of violence.  The Venn-diagram of China was simply not big enough to keep these two massive cultural areas from intersecting.  Then as now women were often victims of violence.  But at other times they were actually independent agents in these destructive cycles.

Consider for instance the social upheaval caused by the Yongle Emperor (1360-1424).  Hongwu, the first Emperor of the Ming dynasty, left a complicated succession situation at the time of his death.  After his first son preceded him, the Emperor decided that the throne should go to his primary grandson (reign title Jianwen), rather than his own next inline surviving son.  The younger, militarily minded, son of Hongwu would not let this slight pass, especially when Jianwen started to eliminate his powerful siblings.  After a successful military campaign Yongle was able to oust his nephew and capture both the capital and the throne for himself.

Unfortunately it was easier to capture the physical space occupied by the capital than the hearts and mind of its inhabitants.  Many important officials flatly refused to serve the new Emperor, and were murdered (along with their families) as a result.  In an attempt to consolidate his legitimacy, and address long standing tactical problems, Yongle ordered that the capital be moved north to Beijing.

This too was easier said than done.  Beijing had been devastated by disease and disaster.  It needed to be rebuilt.  New walls and a grand palace (the Forbidden City) had to be constructed.  Nor could this be done in an economic vacuum.  Other northern economic and population centers also had to be upgraded to shelter and service the new capital.  Even the Grand Canal had to be restored.

This was a massively expensive undertaking.  To finance it the tax role needed to be restored and huge amounts of waste-land had to be reclaimed and tilled.  Vast numbers of workers were necessary to carry out all of these tasks.  Labor was the one item the one item that the Yongle Emperor had in relative abundance.  Nevertheless, tapping those reserves turned out to be more expensive than he imagined.

In order to carry out the various rebuilding projects large numbers of peasants from poverty stricken, and notoriously rebellious, Shandong province were pushed into government labor corvees.  These demands upset the economic and social situation in the area, leading the normal banditry and millennial movements to morph into something much more dangerous, open rebellion.

 

A painting depicting Tang Saier opposing the troops of the Yongle Emperor.

A painting depicting Tang Saier opposing the troops of the Yongle Emperor.  Note the paired sabers, favored by a number of China’s literary heroines.

 

 

One of the critical leaders of this movement was Tang Saier, a woman.  Along with her husband she was successful in leading a group of rebels in the capture of a number of walled cities in Shandong starting in 1420.  In each case the imperial representatives were murdered and her band gained more followers.  Eventually she commanded a rebel army that numbered in the tens of thousands.

Tang Saier used what social roles were available to her in crafting her public political personality.  On the one hand he posed as a self-styled female knight-errant.  Like other warriors from this mold she was seen as fighting both against injustice and for the establishment of the proper social order.  And by all account she was an active and successful military leader.

Prof. Victoria Cass has pointed out that there was also another aspect to her persona.  She was widely seen as a religious adept.  As the de facto “god-mother” of the area’s White Lotus movement she was expected to display the signs of mystical (and even magical) attainment.  Stories circulated that enemy weapons could not harm her, or that she had come into possession of her martial skills when she found an arcane text and a magical sword in a mountain cave.  Some claimed that she was chosen by the Primal Mother of the Nine Heavens, the problematic patron saint of female mystics, recluses and warriors.  Others, including her troops, called her “Mother Buddha.”

This mixing of the martial and magical is typical for millennial uprisings in northern China.  The same basic patterns will reemerge in the rebellions of the late 19th century.  However, Prof. Cass points out that the thematic mixing of the mystic and martial archetypes was much more common in female warriors and military leaders than male ones.  To their followers these miracles were signs that the leader was a true adept who followed the dictates of heaven.  To the state they were evidence of dangerous sorcery and a threat to the established social order that went well beyond the purely military potential of such groups.

The Yongle Emperor may have been particularly vulnerable to the challenge posed by a movement like Tang Saier’s.  Clearly he would have remembered that his own grandfather used his leadership of a millennial army to seize control of the state and establish his own dynasty.  Further, Yongle was moving the capital to the north at a time when his legitimacy was still a sore spot.  He showed little restraint in crushing the new rebellion in Shandong.

What happened next was remarkable.  The imperial army was able to destroy the poorly armed, fed and trained rebels.  Yet after an extensive search they failed to catch Tang Saier.

Obviously the first rule of fighting a messianic figure is not to let her get away, thereby establishing expectations of an imminent return backed by heavenly armies.  In a symbolic sense the legitimacy of the Yongle Emperor’s reigns was based on his ability to find and punish dangerous heterodox leaders who threatened the kingdom with chaos.  This is what it meant to be the “Son of Heaven.”  Yet in this case the search yielded nothing.

The Emperor was incensed and decided (reasonably) that the only way that Tang Saier could evade imperial justice for so long was if someone was hiding her.  Of course there were not that many bases of independent power in the poorer regions of northern China.  The gentry in the area was weak, and most of the big rebel bands had just been crushed.  That left the temples and monasteries, institutions which the state viewed as potentially problematic at the best of times.  It would have been all too easy for Tang Saier to blend into the poorly regulated local religious landscape as either a Daoist or Buddhist adept.

The Emperor’s agents turned their attention to the area’s religious institutions.  On imperial orders the region’s entire population of nuns (both Buddhist and Daoist) was put under arrest and brought to the new capital for questioning.   It was illegal to take up a religious vocation without a license from the government.  These were highly regulated and generally only given to the educated and orthodox.  One can only assume that a huge number of “unofficial” Buddhists and Daoists clergy were returned to the tax role, as well as the land owned by their temples and sanctuaries.  This sweep of the local religious landscape would have been a great help to the Emperor’s efforts to establish de facto social control over northern China.

The one thing it did not accomplish was locating Tang Saier.  Like the later “Elders of Shaolin” and Ng Moy, she successfully evaded the imperial dragnet and was never heard from again.  This was a major embarrassment for the government.  An individual bandit warlord or rebel might evade capture and no one outside of the effected region would really know or care.  But the move against Shandong’s religious community was an event on such a massive scale that it could not be kept secret.  Now everyone knew who Tang Saier was, and they knew that she had gotten away.

 

The wife of a Chinese general circa 1810.  Notice that both she and her female attendant are armed.  Source: Digital Collections of the New York Public Library.

The wife of a Chinese general circa 1810. Notice that both she and her female attendant are armed. Source: Digital Collections of the New York Public Library.

 

The Literary After-life of Tang Saier

 

There is a lot we do not know about Tang Saier.  It turns out that much of what we know about the birth, death and lives of important rebel leaders is glean from imperial records.  These in turn reflect interrogation and trial documents as well official reports.  Given that she was never captured we actually don’t have a clear idea of when she was born or died.

This lack of basic biographical facts has not stopped a rich literature, some political, but most fictional, from springing up around her.  The Ming vilified her as a witch and sorcerer.  Qing historians reevaluated her legacy, and Republic and later Communist historians noted that she fought against what amounted to legalized slavery.

Tang proved to be too charismatic and mysterious a figure to ever disappear from popular discussions, either at the level of local folklore (where she is still remembered) or in the more elite literature.  Ironically an “outsider” like the rebel Tang Saier became the perfect vehicle for a certain group of 18th century Ming loyalists to criticize the political and social conventions of their day.

The first (surviving) novel about Tang Saier was published in 1711 by Lu Xiong.  Lu was highly educated but on the orders of his father (a Ming loyalist) he never sat for the imperial exams, and instead became a physician.  Apparently Lu shared many of his father’s political views and he employed Tang’s criticism of the Yongle Emperor as a screen to comments on much more recent events without running afoul of the censors.

His novel, titled Nuxain Waishi (The Unofficial History of the Female Immortal), was shared widely in manuscript form before it was published and it had many admirers.  The first edition appears to have been fairly successfully.  Unfortunately, the novel was closely tied to a critique of events in the opening years of the 18th century, and as such it was not widely read by succeeding generations, except perhaps by those with an interest in martial arts fiction.  The sweeping nature of its heterodox claims may have also impacted its popularity.  For more on this work and its reception see The Sword or the Needle: The Female Knight Errant (Xia) in Traditional Chinese Narrative by Roland Altenburger (Peter Lang Publishing, 2009).

Perhaps the lasting contribution of this work was its discussion of gender.  Altenburger notes that the novel seems to totally uproot traditional hierarchies and this includes extolling the martial virtues and potential of Yin, or female energies, while at the same time “deflating” male figures and archetypes.  In previous novels female swordsman succeeded only by becoming, in effect, “honorary men.”  Yet that is not the strategy of the heaven-sent protagonist of Nuxain Waishi.  This fictionalized version of Tang represents the Yin energies of the moon and she embraces them to use them to their full advantage.

This choice raises a pressing question.  How can a smaller weaker female body triumph in the intensely physical realm of the knight-errant, where one is expected to meet you enemy not just through strategy (long seen as the strong suit of female warriors) but also through force of arms?  For Lu the answer was clear.  Tang was renown as a female Daoist adept, so the answer must be magic.

While somewhat jarring to modern readers I think this move makes a lot of sense.  The Yin forces of corruption and chaos had always been feared on the battlefield.  As late as the end of the 19th century military leaders in China had attempted to co-opt Yin magic and turn it to their own ends.  It was entirely in keeping with character for Lu to endow his heroine with these same abilities.

Nuxain Waishi may have had a limited readership, but many of its themes went on to influence other, more important novels.   Altenburger notes a number of intertextual dependencies between it and Xianxia Wu Huajian (Five Flower Swords of the Immortal Knights, 1900).  This novel, published under the pseudonym “The Shanghai Sword Freak” by Sun Jiazhen, had a much deeper impact on the development of the modern martial arts novel.

Sales of the initial publication were quite good.  It was so popular that in the early Republic era many authors wrote unauthorized “sequels” hoping to cash in on its success.  In fact, so many people were profiting from the work that its real author actually decided to get in on the act and write a sequel of his own which he had never originally intended to produce.  In this way Sun’s initial story spawned an entire group of novels.  This body of literature, all of which was connected to the memory of Tang Saier, helped to popularize the idea of the female knight errant and set the stage for its the subsequent explosion in the popular consciousness.

Like other authors before him, Sun was forced to ask where exactly a female martial artist would receive her skill or strength from.  Sadly none of these story tellers were actually connected with the real martial arts, so once again magic seemed like a plausible answer.  But this magic had to be different from that employed in the 1711 novel.

In the earlier story Tang was reimagined as a heavily emissary.  She was an embodied immortal sent to protect the legitimate Ming emperor from his corrupt uncle.  But in Flower Sword the plot is more complicated.  A group of immortals are sent to convey their skills, but they must recruit human disciples who are responsible for fighting the battles of this world.  Ultimately the story develops a gender balanced cast of characters. But how do these fully-human females survive in their new calling?

This time it is Daoist alchemy that is specifically invoked.  Human male martial artists recruited by the brotherhood need no physical augmentation to learn the superhuman techniques of the immortals.  Female recruits, however, are given a pill made through alchemical processes.  It strengthens them and hardens their bodies, as well as replacing their bones with light.  Still, the process leaves them in essence female.  They are not so much endowed with Yang properties as made capable of defending themselves through their Yin powers.  They must also master their boxing skills the old fashioned way, through practice.

This sort of flashy external alchemy allows for exciting plots and tense confrontations between good and evil.  Yet at the same time that this is coming out Sun Lutang is starting to publish his own martial philosophy, now available to the middle class reading public.  In these works he too claims that a combination of martial arts and Daoist practices could renew health and promote longevity.  However, for Sun the alchemical furnace that powers this transformation is the internal one.  It goes without saying that his ideas were the more reasonable ones, but ultimately it was the thriller wuxia novels that sold more copies.

Chinese post card showing a young girl studying a sword routine as her teacher looks on.

Chinese post card showing a young girl studying a sword routine as her teacher looks on.

 

 

Conclusion

Tolkien’s initial warnings should be carefully considered.  It is a difficult and dangerous thing to take a living story and try to understand where it came from.  Difficult because in the process of writing, information is not just conveyed, it is twisted, molded and recombined in irrevocable ways.  Once you have made the ox into a soup there is no way to reconstruct the draft animal, let alone to understand its place in an early agrarian society.  The exercise is dangerous as stories are written for a reason, and in breaking them down into a series of interconnected parts we are prone to miss the emergent properties of the system as a whole.  Those were, after all, what attracted most readers or listeners in the first place.

Still, we have learned some important facts about the evolution of Chinese popular culture.  It is certainly true that the motif of the female martial artists exploded in popularity in the early Republic period.  We cannot analyze and understand the Wing Chun creation myth, or many other modern hand combat legends, if we divorce them from this setting.

Yet we have also discovered that this motif has much deeper roots in Chinese literature and culture.  It is possible to find stories of important female warriors in practically every period of Chinese history.  For the sake of brevity I restricted the current essay to an examination of a single figure from the Ming dynasty, but this exercise could be repeated any number of times.

Tang Saier is interesting to us for a number of reasons.  Obviously the story of a female religious adept turned warrior has many echoes in the folklore of the southern Chinese martial arts.  Her evasion of the Yongle Emperor’s attempts to reassert control over the temples and arrest the nuns even prefigures the development of literary figures like Ng Moy in important ways.

Yet what is really remarkable is the relative ease with which we can trace the development of stories based on her life and their subsequent incorporation into modern literature.  It may not be possible to identify all of the source material behind the Wing Chun creation myth, but stories like this one certainly helped to give it flavor.

Of course one central question remains unanswered.  We have now seen how the idea of the female knight-errant exploded in Republic era popular literature, but why did this trend emerge in the first place?  And what relationship, if any, did it have to the transformation of China’s traditional hand combat systems?  We will pursue these questions in a future post.


Now Available: Spring 2016 Issue of Martial Arts Studies – The Invention of Martial Arts

$
0
0

 

 

 

We are happy to announce that the Spring 2016 Issue Martial Arts Studies is now available, free of charge, to any reader or institution.  This open source, peer reviewed, interdisciplinary journal is an imprint of Cardiff University Press.  The articles featured in this issue explore a variety of topics surrounding the “invention of martial arts” in a global setting.  It also includes a number of reviews of recent books, documentaries and conference reports.

Simply click either of the images to download a complete copy of the edition, or visit this link to find PDFs of individual articles or to search our archives.  For an overview of the contents of this issue, readers may also want to start by taking a look at our opening editorial.

Are you interested in contributing to Martial Arts Studies?  If so, see our Call for Papers. Please feel free to share any of these links on your social media accounts.  Let your colleagues and friends know that a new issue of Martial Arts Studies is now available.

 

 

 

 

Martial Arts Studies.Issue 2.TOC


The Cultural Translation of Wing Chun: Addition, Deletion, Adoption and Distortion

$
0
0

Ip-Man-3-New-Image

 

“In the case of Tai Chi however, the major defining feature of hybridity, the sense of mixture and the equal status of the different cultures involving in the mixture, is absent.  In the eyes of its UK practitioners Tai Chi is not a combination or mixture of Chinese and English bodily/spiritual disciplines.  On the contrary, they consider their practices to be more authentic and original than their contemporary Chinese counterparts, since they see them as having a direct linkage to Tai Chi’s ancient lineage and continuing a tradition which they claim was lost in Communist China.  As we will see, in fact, they have added, deleted, adopted and distorted practices derived from their Chinese (or English) masters in a continuous process of translation based on an imagined construction of Chineseness.”

Gehao Zhang.  2010. “Invented Tradition and Translated Practices: The Career of Tai Chi in the West.” Doctoral Thesis, Loughborough University. P. 16

 

 

Introduction

 

Other commitments have taken me away from blogging over the last few weeks.  The Spring 2016 issue of Martial Arts Studies (now available for download) required attention, as did the draft of my paper for this year’s conference at the University of Cardiff in July.  I recently finished a first draft of what will be my keynote address, but it will still require work over the next week or so.

These commitments also distracted me from something else that I had been working on.  Recently I received a copy of Prof. Gehao Zheng’s dissertation “Invented Tradition and Translated Practices: The Career of Tai Chi in the West.” Given that the theme of our recent journal issue was “The Invention of Martial Arts,” I had been reading this with a great deal of interest.  Unfortunately I was not able to finish his manuscript before other commitments caught up with me, but it is something that I intend to return to once things settle down.

Gehao’s discussion of the cultural appropriation of Taijiquan in the West is significant.  And while many of these sorts of studies tend to focus on events in America I found his case-study of the British community quite interesting.  In short, this is the sort of dissertation that warrants a close reading.

Unfortunately that will have to wait for later.   This will be a much lighter essay as I attempt to ease back into my writing schedule.

In today’s post I would like to focus on a single passage from his introductory discussion which I have been mulling over for the last few weeks.  While it speaks directly to the process by which Taijiquan has been received in the West, it carries some basic insights applicable to discussions of all sorts of martial arts.  In fact, it is not hard to spot many of the same basic trends that he notes at work in the Wing Chun community (the area of the traditional arts with which I have the greatest familiarity).

Consider the following observation, “As we will see, in fact, they have added, deleted, adopted and distorted practices derived from their Chinese (or English) masters in a continuous process of translation based on an imagined construction of Chineseness.”  When thinking about the cultural appropriation or translation of the Asian martial arts I think there is a tendency to simplify, or see only a single aspect of this process.

Yet Gehao notes that a community’s preexisting beliefs about the nature of Chinese identity (as well as their own cultural identity) can actually result in a number of strategies of translation.  Here he quickly lists four possibilities.  Obviously his dissertation takes a more nuanced approach and introduces additional concepts.

Nevertheless, over the last few weeks I have decided that I like this simple formulation as it is both easy to remember and reminds us to look for an entire constellation of changes.  To quickly explore the utility of these four descriptive concepts, this post will consider some of the ways that Wing Chun, a traditional martial art hailing from Southern China, has been “translated” into an American commercial and cultural context.  As Gehao found in the case of Taijiquan, popular ideas about the nature of Chinese identity would have an important impact on the resulting reconstruction of Wing Chun in the West.

 

healthy fast food chain.wing chun

 

Added, Deleted, Adopted and Distorted

 

Before delving into this discussion a few caveats are in order.  As much as we might want to practice our art in a “perfect” and pristine state, we should admit that this is probably not possible.  We might also go further and ask why the idea of “purity of transmission” has gained such a hold on the popular discussion of the martial arts?  What set of values and desires does this rhetoric advance?  How are they different in the West than China?

In reality cultural translation is an unavoidable process whenever a given set of practices or identities crosses global and cultural borders.  There have even been substantial periods of “translation” within China itself as the martial arts went from being a mostly rural, occupationally focused, pursuit in the 19th century to being promoted as a nationally focused urban, middle class hobby in the 20th.

Given that none of us are Cantonese speaking tradesmen living in Foshan in the 1850s, our understanding and embodied experience of Wing Chun must be different from Leung Jan’s.  The notion that “identity moves” (to borrow a memorable turn of phrase from Adam Frank) is not an inherently bad thing.  While the process of cultural translation inevitably changes something about an identity or sets of practices as it seeks to make them legible in a very different context, we do not need to view the end product of this process as inherently illegitimate.  This is not to imply that one cannot find better or more unfortunate examples of such translations within the martial arts world.

How can we understand the sorts of transformations that we are likely to see?  As Western practitioners of these systems attempt to make sense of their arts they are forced to negotiate their own experience of these practices with an inevitably imperfect understanding of Chinese identity.  When the transmitted techniques do not conform to their culturally conditioned expectations, change is often the result.

First, “additions” might be made to a system.  These sometimes take the form of core Western cultural values being read onto an Asian art.  In other cases what is added is an inappropriate element of Asian culture or philosophy so that the practice better meets Western expectations about what an “Oriental” art should be.

On the opposite end of the spectrum certain practices or elements of identity might be “deleted” from a westernized version of an art.  Again, specific cultural elements that do not match Western expectations often receive this treatment.

The traditional Chinese martial arts were often rigidly located with regards to questions of social class and gender in ways that would make students in liberal western countries uncomfortable.  While their modern schools often go to great lengths to demonstrate how “traditional” they are, no one that I am aware of refuses to teach women, or prohibits physical contact between unrelated men and women in class even though that would have been a common taboo at the time that Wing Chun was first formulated.  What was once an important set of practices regarding the construction and maintenance of masculinity within a Chinese cultural context has simply been deleted with very little notice.

In addition to these first two responses, Western students might also strategically “adopt” certain practices and identities which fit their expectations about Asian culture.  While relatively few Western martial artists seem inclined to actually learn the native language of their arts (often a daunting challenge), many nevertheless make the mastery of foreign language names and labels something of a fetish.  Yet to Western students this vocabulary often carries connotations that are quite different from how the same terms might be perceived by a native speaker.  Paradoxically, attempts to achieve linguistic accuracy by avoiding the processes of “translation” can actually lead to even greater levels of cultural mystification.

Lastly there is the problem of “distortion.”  In my own experience there are a number of ways that distortion might arise.  The first is a simple misunderstanding.  The lack of cultural and linguistic expertise noted in the previous examples suggests that fighting against the tide of this distortion is the daily work of a dedicated martial arts student seeking a serious encounter with their chosen art.

Distortions are also likely to arise because of the very nature of cultural appropriation.  Once a practice has come to be socially accepted and commercially successful, consumers and students will naturally begin to hybridize the values of their chosen practice with the (often quite different) social discourses that surround them.  Consider how often we encounter advertising materials promoting the health benefits of Kung Fu within the commercially driven paradigm of western athleticism.  It is simply human nature to want all good things to fit together.

In truth the culture of Taekwondo that is practiced in strip malls across America is quite different from that which is seen in Korean military units.  And yet there is an almost universal tendency to accept one’s own vision of the art as uniquely legitimate.  This was one of the more interesting aspects of Gehao’s discussion which I hope to explore in future posts.
Nima King.Wing Chun School

 

Ip Man Comes to America

 

Each of these four strategies have shaped the cultural translation of Wing Chun in the United States.  Perhaps the most notable changes have been the additions.

One of the great challenges that the Chinese martial arts faced in making themselves legible to Western consumers was the prior success of their Japanese cousins.  While Chinese practices tended to be treated somewhat dismissively as boxing, juggling or “sword dancing,” the Western reading public seems to have had a healthy (and remarkably nuanced) appreciation of the Japanese martial arts by the early years of the 20th century.

This early familiarity (and in some cases practice) was amplified by the experience of WWII in which returning GI’s imported an interest in Judo, Karate and (to a much lesser extent) Kendo.  The sorts of Japanese hand combat systems that existed at this period shaped the public’s perfection of what a “traditional Asian martial art” should look like.

The American public quickly came to expect exotic uniforms and colored belts.  Classes were regimented and often reflected the military values of the individuals who brought them back to the US.  And the martial philosophy of Judo and Karate quickly came to be seen as generically “Asian” in nature.

All of this gave the Japanese a substantial “first mover” advantage in the Western marketplace.  In comparison the Chinese hand combat systems did not look like martial arts at all.  The relationship between Chinese teachers and students tended to be much less structured and idiosyncratic.  A formal class curriculum was the exception rather than the norm.  Most Chinese folk styles did not revolve around the idea of regular progression tests and colored belts.  And while the Japanese donned their white gi’s, their Chinese counterparts tended to work out in western style street clothes or t-shirts.  Somehow the Chinese martial arts managed to be both too exotic for comfort and yet not quite “Asian” enough.

Of course almost all of these Japanese “traditions” are of rather recent vintage, reflecting efforts made to modernize their martial arts and introduce them into the education system in the first half of the 20th century.  But the end result was that traditional Kung Fu systems (like Wing Chun) did not always conform to consumers expectations about what a martial art should be.

Chinese Sifu’s (and later their first generation of Western students) were quick to accommodate their new students.  Uniforms were bought, tests for various sorts of colored belts were created, and instruction was standardized.  Thus much of the institutional and organizational infrastructure seen in any Western Wing Chun school today is an example of the ways in which “additions” are used to bring a preexisting set of practices in-line with our current expectations about what a “real” Asian martial arts should be.

The flip side of this process is the deletion.  As was mentioned above, most traditional Chinese arts were situated within local society in very specific ways.  Individual schools were often aligned with specific social, political, economic or even criminal factions.  There was a strong correlation between the practice of boxing and economic marginality.  Nor were women welcome in most traditional training environments.

The story of the cultural translation of these systems has in large part been the abandonment, and even conscious inversion, of each of these realities.  The sorts of neighborhood social structures that supported the martial arts during the Republic period simply do not exist in the West.  Further, the popularity of Daoist and Buddhist philosophy among counter-culture elements in the Western society led to a situation in which egalitarian readings of Asian society were privileged and assumed to be universal.  Gender and racial discrimination in training never carried the same weight on this side of the Pacific.

This example is a valuable reminder that not all changes are negative.  In fact, the judicious use of “deletions” is necessary if the traditional arts wish to survive in a global environment.  Reformers within the Chinese martial arts have understood this since at least the end of the Boxer Rebellion.  Yet the Confucian emphasis on “faithful transmission” of traditional practices and methods means that many of the same people who actively innovate within the martial arts must also work the hardest to maintain the air of “timeless immutability.”

A number of adoptions are also visible within the American Wing Chun community.  The rigid adherence to a set body of forms, training routines, creation myths and conceptual framework allows for the maintenance of truly transnational clan of practitioners.

Still, the preservation of certain forms or ideas can become yet another site of “Orientalization” within the martial arts.  Perhaps there is no more classic example of this than the many contortions that happen around the concept of “Qi” and “internal training.”  While these concepts do not play as central a role in Wing Chun as they do in Taijiquan, they remain a source of speculation.  In fact, certain of his Western-grand students seem to focus on these concepts more than Ip Man himself did.  A similar tendency is also seen in an emphasis on traditional Chinese medicine.  It is often forgotten that this was not particularly popular in Hong Kong during the 1960s-1970s, and certainly not to the same degree that it became on the mainland after the 1990s.

While the rise and fall of the popularity of TCM is a historically bounded (and frequently studied) phenomenon in China, Western consumers have essentialized it.  As such, students of a Chinese martial art may feel a strong pull towards the study of this other discipline. It can even become a lens through which seemingly unrelated martial arts are understood.

Lastly we come to the question of “distortion.”  Some of the ways that Chinese religion, more specifically Chan Buddhism and Daoism, are read into Wing Chun might fall into this category.  The style’s creation myth references the burning of the Shaolin temple, but this is a common motif shared by a number of social groups throughout southern Chinese society.  While some students of Wing Chun have been dedicated Buddhists it does not follow that the practice itself is a Buddhist art.  Likewise, many of the supposedly Daoist elements that students sometimes perceive are better understood as cases of generic Chinese culture.

An exaggerated emphasis on Buddhism and Daoism creates “distortion” in the cultural translation of Wing Chun on at least two levels.  Most immediately, it obscured other influences that are present and may reveal something either about the nature of the art or Ip Man’s thinking.  Ip Chun, the son of Ip Man, has noted on numerous occasions that his father was strongly influenced by his Confucian education, and that those looking for the deep philosophical roots of the art should start there.

His advice could easily be expanded upon.  A lack of interest in Confucian thought is one of the odd blind-spots of current students of Chinese martial studies.  This was the dominant social philosophy throughout the 19th and early 20th century, the same time period that many of these fighting systems were taking shape. Students of any number of southern Martial Arts systems might benefit form a closer study of this cultural milieu.

Yet on a deeper level, why must Wing Chun have a spiritual (or religious) philosophy?  Is a martial art only legitimate if it is dedicated to some sort of transcendent goals?  When Ip Man told a young Clausnitzer that it was his goal to teach Wing Chun as “a modern form of kung fu, i.e., as a style of boxing highly relevant to modern fighting conditions,” can we not take him at his word?

Once again, our expectations of what a “proper” martial art should be can powerfully shape the ways in which we experience, understand and transmit these systems.  Japanese ideals of the “martial way” and Republic era Chinese notions of the martial arts as vectors for nationalism and cultural essentialism continue to shape the popular understanding of Asian identity in powerful ways.  These, in turn, have impacted the way that Wing Chun has been culturally translated.

ip man.chair

 

Conclusion

 

Ip Man’s photo is displayed prominently on the walls of martial arts schools across North America.  If he were to look out through the eyes of these icons, what would he see?  Would he recognize the Wing Chun being performed in his name?

I suspect that he would be very surprised with some aspects of the scene below.  He would recognize the colored belts, but would probably find them out of place.  The highly structured format of our classes would also seem alien to him.  He could not help but wonder why his picture so often hangs next to that of Bruce Lee and Dan Inosanto.

Yet I doubt that he would be confused by the purposes of the changes that he saw.  After all, Ip Man guided his branch of Wing Chun through an important period of “cultural translation” as it went from being one kind of martial art in Republican Foshan, and became something notably different in the Crown Colony of Hong Kong.

Those with previous training in the system were surprised to see how differently Ip Man’s post-1950 classes were structured.  A curriculum had been added, traditional concepts were deleted, the local culture of youth fighting was “adopted” (or at least tolerated) and the practice of chi sao had been elevated and made a central aspect of daily training. Translation and change was the price of making Wing Chun legible to a new generation of Hong Kong students.

While Ip Man might at first be mystified by some of the details, he would understand the basic processes at work in our own era.  He knew that it would take work and flexibility to maintain Wing Chun as a modern fighting system.  Mostly, I suspect,  he would just be happy to have another generation of students to practice his chi sao on.

 

 

oOo

If you enjoyed this you might also want to read:  Why is Ip Man a Role Model?

oOo


Viewing all 467 articles
Browse latest View live